Article

Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses.

Department of Implantodontics and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School of Lutheran University of Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Journal of Oral Science (Impact Factor: 0.92). 12/2009; 51(4):535-43. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.51.535
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The complexity of rehabilitation for totally edentulous patients makes it necessary to devise treatment strategies that meet the patients' expectations in terms of function, esthetic, psychological, and social aspects. The aim of this study was to i) compare the satisfaction of edentulous patients who had been rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses in the mandible, and ii) assess the technical aspects of the prostheses in relation to patient satisfaction. This was a cross-sectional study involving 30 patients, 15 of whom had been rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and 15 who had been treated with fixed prostheses. The patients answered the OHIP-EDENT questionnaire, validated for the Brazilian Portuguese language, to assess satisfaction. Also, patients underwent clinical examination to assess the condition of their prostheses. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U-test revealed no significant differences in satisfaction between patients with overdentures and those with fixed prostheses. Likewise, Fisher's exact test demonstrated no significant differences in patient satisfaction concerning the condition of the prostheses as evaluated by the prosthodontist. It was concluded that both types of prostheses were perceived as being equally satisfactory by edentulous patients, and that the condition of the prostheses did not influence individual satisfaction in terms of rehabilitation.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sabrina Zani, Aug 19, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
246 Views
  • Source
    • "Only a few studies have used OHIP- EDENT questionnaire, which is the most indicated version for edentulous patients wearing dentures. Zani et al. (2009) applied the OHIP-EDENT to evaluate the impact of overdentures and fixed prostheses on QoL, finding that both types of prostheses were perceived as being equally satisfactory by edentulous patients. Adam et al. (2007) showed that OHRQoL improved significantly in four (psychological discomfort and disability, social disability and handicap) of the seven domains after patients were provided with a new set of complete dentures. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of a minimally invasive implant procedure for denture stabilization on patients' quality of life (QoL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty totally edentulous patients were selected for this study. All prostheses were adjusted and relined before randomization and allocation to treatment either with two small diameter implants (SDI) - retained overdenture (study group) or non-intervention group (control group). Quality of life was assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-EDENT (OHIP-EDENT) questionnaire before intervention and at one-year follow-up. Between-group comparisons were carried out using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Magnitude of change in the OHIP-EDENT total score at one-year follow-up was 25.4 ± 10.7 for the study group, revealing a statistically significant difference with the control group, that showed a change of 9.5 ± 8.3 (P = < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After one-year follow-up, patients wearing mandibular overdentures with two minimally invasive splinted SDI, experienced more improvements in perceived oral health-related quality of life, than patients having conventional treatment.
    Clinical Oral Implants Research 07/2012; 10. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02529.x · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    01/2010: pages 402; Instituto de Geriatría.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinical studies have mainly been focused on oral health-related quality-of-life (OHRQoL) outcomes of removable dentures. To evaluate therapy of elderly patients with implant-supported fixed partial dentures (IFPD) and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures (FPD) in the posterior dental regions. The OHIP49 was used to measure OHRQoL in 64 patients with IFPD and 38 patients with FPD, before, 3 weeks and 3 years after rehabilitation. A control group (CG) consisted of 62 individuals. The Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP) follow-up scores of the patients with FPD and the patients with IFPD were significantly smaller in comparison with the baseline scores (p < 0.01). The OHIP scores were further reduced at the 3-year follow-up. The patients with IFPD had significantly higher scores than the patients with FPD and the CG at the baseline and at the follow-ups. In the patients with FPD, both age groups (≤60 and >60) showed equal improvement of the OHRQoL. In the IFPD group, patients older than 60 years showed better improvement (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences dependent on gender and antagonistic teeth (p > 0.05). The FPD and the IFPD treatment showed significant improvement of OHRQoL. The FPD treatment improved OHRQoL equally in both age groups, while the IFPD treatment improved OHRQoL better in older patients.
    Gerodontology 11/2011; 29(2):e956-63. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00592.x · 0.81 Impact Factor
Show more