An Adequately Robust Early TNF-α Response Is a Hallmark of Survival Following Trauma/Hemorrhage

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 12/2009; 4(12):e8406. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008406
Source: PubMed


Trauma/hemorrhagic shock (T/HS) results in cytokine-mediated acute inflammation that is generally considered detrimental.
Paradoxically, plasma levels of the early inflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha (but not IL-6, IL-10, or NO(2) (-)/NO(3) (-)) were significantly elevated within 6 h post-admission in 19 human trauma survivors vs. 4 non-survivors. Moreover, plasma TNF-alpha was inversely correlated with Marshall Score, an index of organ dysfunction, both in the 23 patients taken together and in the survivor cohort. Accordingly, we hypothesized that if an early, robust pro-inflammatory response were to be a marker of an appropriate response to injury, then individuals exhibiting such a response would be predisposed to survive. We tested this hypothesis in swine subjected to various experimental paradigms of T/HS. Twenty-three anesthetized pigs were subjected to T/HS (12 HS-only and 11 HS + Thoracotomy; mean arterial pressure of 30 mmHg for 45-90 min) along with surgery-only controls. Plasma obtained at pre-surgery, baseline post-surgery, beginning of HS, and every 15 min thereafter until 75 min (in the HS only group) or 90 min (in the HS + Thoracotomy group) was assayed for TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-10, and NO(2) (-)/NO(3) (-). Mean post-surgery+/-HS TNF-alpha levels were significantly higher in the survivors vs. non-survivors, while non-survivors exhibited no measurable change in TNF-alpha levels over the same interval.
Contrary to the current dogma, survival in the setting of severe, acute T/HS appears to be associated with an immediate increase in serum TNF-alpha. It is currently unclear if this response was the cause of this protection, a marker of survival, or both. This abstract won a Young Investigator Travel Award at the SHOCK 2008 meeting in Cologne, Germany.

Download full-text


Available from: Sven Zenker,
  • Source
    • "Despite the attractiveness of purely systemic therapy, the ineffectiveness of such interventions has been demonstrated in multiple studies in animal models of sepsis in which suppressing systemic inflammation resulted in immunosuppression and elevated morbidity and mortality due to overwhelming infection (Remick et al., 1995; Natanson, 1997). Similarly, an insufficient systemic inflammatory response is associated with elevated morbidity and mortality even in nominally sterile trauma/hemorrhage in both humans and swine (Namas et al., 2009a). Thus, systemic-level interventions may lead to inappropriate damping of a necessary inflammatory response in those tissues and compartments that have not approached their “tipping point.” "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute inflammation leads to organ failure by engaging catastrophic feedback loops in which stressed tissue evokes an inflammatory response and, in turn, inflammation damages tissue. Manifestations of this maladaptive inflammatory response include cardio-respiratory dysfunction that may be reflected in reduced heart rate and ventilatory pattern variabilities. We have developed signal-processing algorithms that quantify non-linear deterministic characteristics of variability in biologic signals. Now, coalescing under the aegis of the NIH Computational Biology Program and the Society for Complexity in Acute Illness, two research teams performed iterative experiments and computational modeling on inflammation and cardio-pulmonary dysfunction in sepsis as well as on neural control of respiration and ventilatory pattern variability. These teams, with additional collaborators, have recently formed a multi-institutional, interdisciplinary consortium, whose goal is to delineate the fundamental interrelationship between the inflammatory response and physiologic variability. Multi-scale mathematical modeling and complementary physiological experiments will provide insight into autonomic neural mechanisms that may modulate the inflammatory response to sepsis and simultaneously reduce heart rate and ventilatory pattern variabilities associated with sepsis. This approach integrates computational models of neural control of breathing and cardio-respiratory coupling with models that combine inflammation, cardiovascular function, and heart rate variability. The resulting integrated model will provide mechanistic explanations for the phenomena of respiratory sinus-arrhythmia and cardio-ventilatory coupling observed under normal conditions, and the loss of these properties during sepsis. This approach holds the potential of modeling cross-scale physiological interactions to improve both basic knowledge and clinical management of acute inflammatory diseases such as sepsis and trauma.
    Frontiers in Physiology 07/2012; 3:222. DOI:10.3389/fphys.2012.00222 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Like any situation that involves communication, the content, tone, and context matter a great deal. On the one hand, an appropriately robust inflammatory response is necessary to survive diverse insults both in the very short and long term [50]. Although organs obtained from patients with sepsis postmortem may not exhibit histologic damage [51], these organs are nonetheless dysfunctional because of various defects that manifest, at the cellular level, in both epithelial [52] and endothelial cells [15] [16]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sepsis is a clinical syndrome characterized by a multisystem response to a microbial pathogenic insult consisting of a mosaic of interconnected biochemical, cellular, and organ-organ interaction networks. A central thread that connects these responses is inflammation that, while attempting to defend the body and prevent further harm, causes further damage through the feed-forward, proinflammatory effects of damage-associated molecular pattern molecules. In this review, we address the epidemiology and current definitions of sepsis and focus specifically on the biologic cascades that comprise the inflammatory response to sepsis. We suggest that attempts to improve clinical outcomes by targeting specific components of this network have been unsuccessful due to the lack of an integrative, predictive, and individualized systems-based approach to define the time-varying, multidimensional state of the patient. We highlight the translational impact of computational modeling and other complex systems approaches as applied to sepsis, including in silico clinical trials, patient-specific models, and complexity-based assessments of physiology.
    Journal of critical care 07/2011; 27(3):314.e1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.025 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inflammation is a complex, non-linear process central to many of the diseases that affect both developed and emerging nations. A systems-based understanding of inflammation, coupled to translational applications, is therefore necessary for efficient development of drugs and devices, for streamlining analyses at the level of populations, and for the implementation of personalized medicine. We have carried out an iterative and ongoing program of literature analysis, generation of prospective data, data analysis, and computational modeling in various experimental and clinical inflammatory disease settings. These simulations have been used to gain basic insights into the inflammatory response under baseline, gene-knockout, and drug-treated experimental animals for in silico studies associated with the clinical settings of sepsis, trauma, acute liver failure, and wound healing to create patient-specific simulations in polytrauma, traumatic brain injury, and vocal fold inflammation; and to gain insight into host-pathogen interactions in malaria, necrotizing enterocolitis, and sepsis. These simulations have converged with other systems biology approaches (e.g., functional genomics) to aid in the design of new drugs or devices geared towards modulating inflammation. Since they include both circulating and tissue-level inflammatory mediators, these simulations transcend typical cytokine networks by associating inflammatory processes with tissue/organ impacts via tissue damage/dysfunction. This framework has now allowed us to suggest how to modulate acute inflammation in a rational, individually optimized fashion. This plethora of computational and intertwined experimental/engineering approaches is the cornerstone of Translational Systems Biology approaches for inflammatory diseases.
    Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology 02/2010; 32(2):181-95. DOI:10.3109/08923970903369867 · 1.20 Impact Factor
Show more