Article

Acetaminophen use in pregnancy and risk of birth defects: findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.37). 01/2010; 115(1):109-15. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c52616
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate whether exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy to single-ingredient acetaminophen increases the risk of major birth defects.
Data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a population-based, case-control study, were used. Women who delivered between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2004, and participated in the telephone interview were included. Type and timing of acetaminophen use were assigned based on maternal report. Women reporting first-trimester acetaminophen use in a combination product were excluded, resulting in a total of 11,610 children in the case group and 4,500 children in the control group for analysis.
The prevalence of first-trimester single-ingredient-acetaminophen use was common: 46.9% (n=5,440) among women in the case group and 45.8% (n=2,059) among women in the control group (P=.21). Overall, acetaminophen was not associated with an increased risk of any birth defect. Among women reporting a first-trimester infection and fever, use of acetaminophen was associated with a statistically significantly decreased odds ratio (OR) for anencephaly or craniorachischisis (adjusted OR 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.80), encephalocele (adjusted OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.87), anotia or microtia (adjusted OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.86), cleft lip with or without cleft palate (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.75), and gastroschisis (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.94).
Single-ingredient-acetaminophen use during the first trimester does not appear to increase the risk of major birth defects. It may decrease the risk of selected malformations when used for a febrile illness.
II.

1 Bookmark
 · 
196 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To investigate associations between maternal use of common medications and herbals during early pregnancy and risk for hypospadias in male infants. METHODS: We used data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a multi-site, population-based, case-control study. We analyzed data from 1537 infants with second-degree or third-degree isolated hypospadias and 4314 live-born male control infants without major birth defects, with estimated dates of delivery from 1997 to 2007. Exposure was reported use of prescription or over-the-counter medications or herbal products, from 1 month before to 4 months after conception. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, pre-pregnancy body mass index, previous live births, maternal subfertility, study site, and year. RESULTS: We assessed 64 medication and 24 herbal components. Maternal uses of most components were not associated with an increased risk of hypospadias. Two new associations were observed for venlafaxine (aOR 2.4; 95%CI 1.0, 6.0) and progestin-only oral contraceptives (aOR 1.9; 95%CI 1.1, 3.2). The previously reported association for clomiphene citrate was confirmed (aOR 1.9; 95%CI 1.2, 3.0). Numbers were relatively small for exposure to other specific patterns of fertility agents, but elevated aORs were observed for the most common of them. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, findings were reassuring that hypospadias is not associated with most medication components examined in this analysis. New associations will need to be confirmed in other studies. Increased risks for hypospadias associated with various fertility agents raise the possibility of confounding by underlying subfertility. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 04/2013; DOI:10.1002/pds.3448 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Congenital anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the most frequently observed birth defects of the digestive system. However, their etiology remains elusive. Therefore, we aim to summarize and critically appraise all existing literature on the genetic and nongenetic etiology of nonsyndromic ARM and to conclude with unifying hypotheses and directions for future research. A structured literature search on English language human studies was conducted in PubMed and Embase up to October 1, 2013, resulting in 112 included articles. Research on the identification of genes underlying nonsyndromic ARM is remarkably scarce. Most studies were focused on screening of candidate genes for mutations or single-nucleotide polymorphisms, which did not yield any substantial evidence. Nongenetic factors fairly consistently found to be associated with ARM are assisted reproductive techniques, multiple pregnancy, preterm delivery, low birth weight, maternal overweight or obesity, and preexisting diabetes. This review provides indications for the involvement of both genes and nongenetic risk factors in the etiology of ARM. In future studies, large cohorts of patients with ARM from national and international collaborations are needed to acquire new hypotheses and knowledge through hypothesis-generating approaches. Challenges for future studies may also lie in the investigation of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Birth Defects Research (Part C) 102:382-400, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Birth Defects Research Part C Embryo Today Reviews 12/2014; 102(4). DOI:10.1002/bdrc.21068 · 4.44 Impact Factor
  • Anaesthesia 05/2014; 69(7). DOI:10.1111/anae.12716 · 3.85 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
210 Downloads
Available from
Jun 6, 2014