Incentive-elicited mesolimbic activation and externalizing symptomatology in adolescents

Division of Clinical Neuroscience and Behavioral Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.46). 12/2009; 51(7):827-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02201.x
Source: PubMed


Opponent-process theories of externalizing disorders (ExD) attribute them to some combination of overactive reward processing systems and/or underactive behavior inhibition systems. Reward processing has been indexed by recruitment of incentive-motivational neurocircuitry of the ventral striatum (VS), including nucleus accumbens (NAcc).
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with an incentive task to determine whether externalizing symptomatology in adolescence is correlated with an enhanced VS recruitment by cues for rewards, or by deliveries of rewards. Twelve community-recruited adolescents with externalizing disorders (AED) and 12 age/gender-matched controls responded to targets to win or avoid losing $0, $0.20, $1, $5, or an unknown amount (ranging from $0.20 to $5).
Cues to respond for rewards activated the NAcc (relative to cues for no incentive), in both subject groups similarly, with greatest NAcc recruitment by cues for the largest reward. Loss-anticipatory NAcc signal increase was detected in a volume-of-interest analysis - but this increase occurred only in trials when subjects hit the target. Relative to controls, AED showed significantly elevated NAcc activation by a linear contrast between reward notification versus notification of failure to win reward. In a post hoc reanalysis, VS and pregenual anterior cingulate activation by the reward versus non-reward outcome contrast also directly correlated with Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing total scores (across all subjects) in lieu of a binary diagnosis. Finally, both groups showed right insula activation by loss notifications (contrasted with avoided losses).
Externalizing behavior, whether assessed dimensionally with a questionnaire, or in the form of a diagnostic categorization, is associated with an exaggerated limbic response to outcomes of reward-directed behavior. This could be a neurobiological signature of the behavioral sensitivity to laboratory reward delivery that is characteristic of children with externalizing symptomatology. Of interest is future research on incentive-motivational processing in more severe, clinically referred AED.

Download full-text


Available from: Daniel W Hommer,
  • Source
    • "ant motivation , often manifesting as criminality , aggression , self - harm , and substance use / relapse ( Charney et al . , 2010 ; Jahng et al . , 2011 ) , and these behaviors and traits ( even when sub - clinical ) have been strongly linked to the integrity of PFC and medial temporal structures ( Matsuo et al . , 2009 ; Yang and Raine , 2009 ; Bjork et al . , 2010 ; Sato et al . , 2012 ; Wallace et al . , 2012 ; Montigny et al . , 2013 ; Schilling et al . , 2013 ; Castellanos - Ryan et al . , 2014 ) . Our failure to detect group differences in amygdala and hippocampus volumes was therefore unexpected ( see Supplementary Materials for data and further discussion ) . Moreover , OFC abnormalities ar"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Personality disorder symptomatology (PD-Sx) can result in personal distress and impaired interpersonal functioning, even in the absence of a clinical diagnosis, and is frequently comorbid with psychiatric disorders such as substance use, mood, and anxiety disorders; however, they often remain untreated, and are not taken into account in clinical studies. To investigate brain morphological correlates of PD-Sx, we measured subcortical volume and shape, and cortical thickness/surface area, based on structural magnetic resonance images. We investigated 37 subjects who reported PD-Sx exceeding DSM-IV Axis-II screening thresholds, and 35 age, sex, and smoking status-matched control subjects. Subjects reporting PD-Sx were then grouped into symptom-based clusters: N = 20 into Cluster B (reporting Antisocial, Borderline, Histrionic, or Narcissistic PD-Sx) and N = 28 into Cluster C (reporting Obsessive–Compulsive, Avoidant, or Dependent PD-Sx); N = 11 subjects reported PD-Sx from both clusters, and none reported Cluster A (Paranoid, Schizoid, or Schizotypal) PD-Sx. Compared to control, Cluster C PD-Sx was associated with greater striatal surface area localized to the caudate tail, smaller ventral striatum volumes, and greater cortical thickness in right prefrontal cortex. Both Cluster B and C PD-Sx groups also showed trends toward greater posterior caudate volumes and orbitofrontal surface area anomalies, but these findings did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. The results point to morphological abnormalities that could contribute to Cluster C PD-Sx. In addition, the observations parallel those in substance use disorders, pointing to the importance of considering PD-Sx when interpreting findings in often-comorbid psychiatric disorders.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 08/2015; 9(472). DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00472 · 3.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The heightened ventral striatum reactivity was complemented by ADHD-specific medial prefrontal overactivation under social reward conditions. In ADHD, stronger medial prefrontal activation, including anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex, in response to reward (i.e., money) has been quite consistently reported before (Bjork et al., 2010; Gatzke-Kopp et al., 2009; Ströhle et al., 2008; Wilbertz et al., 2012) and has been shown to be normalized through MPH administration (Rubia et al., 2009a). Our finding of medial prefrontal overreactivity in response to social reward can be seen in line with Wilbertz and colleagues who reported stronger orbitofrontal activity for non-monetary reward (i.e., checkmark for accurate task performance) in adults with ADHD (Wilbertz et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) share certain neurocognitive characteristics, it has been hypothesized to differentiate the two disorders based on their brain’s reward responsiveness to either social or monetary reward. Thus, the present fMRI study investigated neural activation in response to both reward types in age and IQ-matched boys with ADHD versus ASD relative to typically controls (TDC). A significant group by reward type interaction effect emerged in the ventral striatum with greater activation to monetary versus social reward only in TDC, whereas subjects with ADHD responded equally strong to both reward types, and subjects with ASD showed low striatal reactivity across both reward conditions. Moreover, disorder-specific neural abnormalities were revealed, including medial prefrontal hyperactivation in response to social reward in ADHD versus ventral striatal hypoactivation in response to monetary reward in ASD. Shared dysfunction was characterized by fronto-striato-parietal hypoactivation in both clinical groups when money was at stake. Interestingly, lower neural activation within parietal circuitry was associated with higher autistic traits across the entire study sample. In sum, the present findings concur with the assumption that both ASD and ADHD display distinct and shared neural dysfunction in response to reward.
    Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.08.003 · 3.83 Impact Factor
    • "lescent social phobia ( Guyer , 2012 ) . However , we sought to under - stand individual differences in decision - making and reward processing in typically developing adolescents . Several studies investigating these differences have demonstrated that adolescents reporting more risky behavior ( Galvan et al . , 2007 ) or externalizing behaviors ( Bjork , Chen , et al . , 2010 ) in everyday life showed more anticipatory reward - related activity during the monetary incentive delay task . In the decision - making realm , several studies have demonstrated less risk - related dACC activity for those taking more risks ( Van Leijenhorst , Gunther Moor , et al . , 2010 ; Eshel et al . , 2007 ) . In our study , we l"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adolescent decision-making is a topic of great public and scientific interest. However, much of the neuroimaging research in this area contrasts only one facet of decision-making (e.g., neural responses to anticipation or receipt of monetary rewards). Few studies have directly examined the processes that occur immediately before making a decision between two options that have varied and unpredictable potential rewards and penalties. Understanding adolescent decision-making from this vantage point may prove critical to ameliorating risky behavior and improving developmental outcomes. In this study, participants aged 14-16 engaged in a driving simulation game while undergoing fMRI. Results indicated activity in ventral striatum preceded risky decisions and activity in right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) preceded safe decisions. Furthermore, participants who reported higher sensation-seeking and sensitivity to reward and punishment demonstrated lower rIFG activity during safe decisions. Finally, over successive games, rIFG activity preceding risky decisions decreased, whereas thalamus and caudate activity increased during positive feedback (taking a risk without crashing). These results indicate that regions traditionally associated with reward processing and inhibition not only drive risky decision-making in the moment but also contribute to learning about risk tradeoffs during adolescence.
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 08/2014; 27(1):1-13. DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00694 · 4.09 Impact Factor
Show more