Article

Nucleosome positioning by genomic excluding-energy barriers.

Universitè Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 12/2009; 106(52):22257-62. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909511106
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recent genome-wide nucleosome mappings along with bioinformatics studies have confirmed that the DNA sequence plays a more important role in the collective organization of nucleosomes in vivo than previously thought. Yet in living cells, this organization also results from the action of various external factors like DNA-binding proteins and chromatin remodelers. To decipher the code for intrinsic chromatin organization, there is thus a need for in vitro experiments to bridge the gap between computational models of nucleosome sequence preferences and in vivo nucleosome occupancy data. Here we combine atomic force microscopy in liquid and theoretical modeling to demonstrate that a major sequence signaling in vivo are high-energy barriers that locally inhibit nucleosome formation rather than favorable positioning motifs. We show that these genomic excluding-energy barriers condition the collective assembly of neighboring nucleosomes consistently with equilibrium statistical ordering principles. The analysis of two gene promoter regions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the human genome indicates that these genomic barriers direct the intrinsic nucleosome occupancy of regulatory sites, thereby contributing to gene expression regulation.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Philippe Bouvet, Jul 05, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
188 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this work, a novel method was developed to distinguish nucleosome DNA and linker DNA based on increment of diversity combined with quadratic discriminant analysis (IDQD), using k-mer frequency of nucleotides in genome. When used to predict DNA potential for forming nucleosomes, the model achieved a high accuracy of 94.94%, 77.60%, and 86.81%, respectively, for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Homo sapiens, and Drosophila melanogaster. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of our classifier was 0.982 for S. cerevisiae. Our results indicate that DNA sequence preference is critical for nucleosome formation potential and is likely conserved across eukaryotes. The model successfully identified nucleosome-enriched or nucleosome-depleted regions in S. cerevisiae genome, suggesting nucleosome positioning depends on DNA sequence preference. Thus, IDQD classifier is useful for predicting nucleosome positioning.
    Chromosome Research 10/2010; 18(7):777-85. DOI:10.1007/s10577-010-9160-9 · 2.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As an important actor in the regulation of nuclear functions, the nucleosomal organization of the 10 nm chromatin fiber is the subject of increasing interest. Recent high-resolution mapping of nucleosomes along various genomes ranging from yeast to human, have revealed a patchy nucleosome landscape with alternation of depleted, well positioned and fuzzy regions. For many years, the mechanisms that control nucleosome occupancy along eukaryotic chromosomes and their coupling to transcription and replication processes have been under intense experimental and theoretical investigation. A recurrent question is to what extent the genomic sequence dictates and/or constrains nucleosome positioning and dynamics? In that context we have recently developed a simple thermodynamical model that accounts for both sequence specificity of the histone octamer and for nucleosome–nucleosome interactions. As a main issue, our modelling mimics remarkably well in vitro data showing that the sequence signaling that prevails are high energy barriers that locally inhibit nucleosome formation and condition the collective positioning of neighboring nucleosomes according to thermal equilibrium statistical ordering. When comparing to in vivo data, our physical modelling performs as well as models based on statistical learning suggesting that in vivo bulk chromatin is to a large extent controlled by the underlying genomic sequence although it is also subject to finite-range remodelling action of external factors including transcription factors and ATP-dependent chromatin remodellers. On the highly studied S. cerevisiae organism, we discuss the implications of the highlighted ‘positioning via excluding’ mechanism on the structure and function of yeast genes. The generalization of our physical modelling to human is likely to provide new insight on the isochore structure of mammalian genomes in relation with their primary nucleosomal structure.
    Frontiers in Life Science 06/2011; 5(1-2). DOI:10.1080/21553769.2012.708882 · 0.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Experiences with distance learning methods have shown that the step from traditional, teacher‐based training to self‐organized learning is sometimes too great for trainees to adapt comfortably to the new method. Particularly where the trainees have no experience of learning — as opposed to being taught — there is a need to provide a familiar, structured experience to support distance learning. This support system, however, should not destroy the advantages to be gained from self‐organized learning but should provide a ‘bridge’ to help the trainee to attain them. Such a system therefore must contain an element of improving the trainee's effectiveness as a learner.One method of achieving this is by use of the ‘learning circle’. A circle consists of a group of learners, a line‐manager and a training adviser who contract together to achieve the objectives of a distance learning programme. The learners agree to organize the task themselves and to study their own learning processes. The manager and trainer agree to provide necessary resources, to support the learning effort and to assist the learners in developing their learning skills. The article describes this process and considers some theoretical and practical aspects of learning circles.
    Innovations in Education and Training International 11/1985; 22(4):343-346. DOI:10.1080/1355800850220408