Propranolol reduces emotional distraction in working memory: a partial mediating role of propranolol-induced cortisol increases?

Leiden University-Institute of Psychology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (Impact Factor: 3.33). 12/2009; 93(3):388-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.12.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Noradrenalin modulates prefrontal function, such as working memory (WM), and is associated with enhanced distractibility, and enhanced memory for emotional events and stimuli. The beta-blocker propranolol has been shown to reduce memory for emotional stimuli. Herein we describe investigations aimed at assessing whether the administration of propranolol would reduce the interference by emotional distractions during WM performance. In a between-subjects design, 48 young, healthy men received 80 mg propranolol (n=25) or placebo (n=23), before performing an "emotional Sternberg task" with neutral and negatively arousing distracters. Compared to placebo, propranolol impaired WM at low load, however, it also reduced the interference by emotional distracters at high load. Furthermore, an explorative moderated-mediation analysis indicated that the observed propranolol effects on emotional distraction were partially mediated by cortisol. In future non-clinical and clinical memory studies using propranolol administration, cortisol elevations should be monitored to further investigate the potential mediating role of cortisol.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although stress simultaneously affects and causes changes in central nervous system systems together with the sympathetic nervous system and the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, this interaction and its behavioral consequences are rarely assessed. The current paper first describes the different systems involved in the perception and processing of stressful stimuli on an anatomical and functional level, and the available measures to assess changes in these systems. It then explores, based on theoretical and empirical grounds, the interaction of the systems. This is followed by a review of previous stress models, and how these attempted to integrate the interaction of these systems. Then, it complements previous models by suggesting a complementary regulation of the stress systems, and discusses potential behavioral consequences. Finally, based on the three-system approach to assess stress it is argued that psychological measures, together with physiological and endocrine measures are indispensable. However, the lack of consensus on how to best assess the central and sympathetic nervous system components of stress make it more difficult to include measures of all systems routinely in future stress studies. Thus, the paper closes by giving some recommendations on how to include a minimum of feasible stress measures for all systems involved in stress processing and regulation.
    Psychoneuroendocrinology 03/2013; · 5.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dual-process models of addiction suggest that addiction involves an imbalance between impulsive and reflective processing. That is, alcohol-approach associations may influence behavior, unless such influences are modulated by working memory processes. However, working memory processes may themselves be affected by salient and incentive stimuli. Recent work suggests that temporal dynamics may play a central role in such effects. A novel alcohol Sternberg task was used to further study such interference in social drinkers. Subjects had to keep a list of numbers in mind while performing secondary tasks involving alcoholic and non-alcoholic stimuli. Delays between the end of the secondary task and memory probes were varied to determine the persistence of interference over time. Results showed a more persistent slowing of responses at recall following alcoholic versus non-alcoholic stimuli. At the short delay, no alcohol-related differences were found; at the longer delay, however, reaction time had decreased significantly over the delay period but only following non-alcoholic stimuli. Alcohol-related stimuli thus appeared to cause relatively persistent interference with ongoing working memory processes. The findings provide suggestions about the nature of alcohol-related effects on working memory. Further, the finding that alcohol-related effects may be dependent on the timing of trial events may be an important methodological consideration in future studies.
    06/2012; 20(4):284-290.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess cognitive function in children and adolescents presenting with acute conversion symptoms. Fifty-seven participants aged 8.5-18 years (41 girls and 16 boys) with conversion symptoms and 57 age- and gender-matched healthy controls completed the IntegNeuro neurocognitive battery, an estimate of intelligence, and self-report measures of subjective emotional distress. Participants with conversion symptoms showed poorer performance within attention, executive function, and memory domains. Poorer performance was reflected in more errors on specific tests: Switching of Attention (t(79) = 2.17, p = .03); Verbal Interference (t(72) = 2.64, p = .01); Go/No-Go (t(73) = 2.20, p = .03); Memory Recall and Verbal Learning (interference errors for memory recall; t(61) = 3.13, p < .01); and short-delay recall (t(75) = 2.05, p < .01) and long-delay recall (t(62) = 2.24, p = .03). Poorer performance was also reflected in a reduced span of working memory on the Digit Span Test for both forward recall span (t(103) = -3.64, p < .001) and backward recall span (t(100) = -3.22, p < .01). There was no difference between participants and controls on IQ estimate (t(94) = -589, p = .56), and there was no correlation between cognitive function and perceived distress. Children and adolescents with acute conversion symptoms have a reduced capacity to manipulate and retain information, to block interfering information, and to inhibit responses, all of which are required for effective attention, executive function, and memory.
    Journal of Neuropsychology 01/2014; · 3.82 Impact Factor