Article

Urban-rural differences of gynaecological malignancies in Egypt (1999-2002)

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Impact Factor: 3.86). 12/2009; 117(3):348-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02447.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In previous studies, we have shown a three to four times higher urban incidence of breast cancer and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers in the Gharbiah Province of Egypt. We investigated the urban-rural incidence differences of gynaecologic malignancies (uterine, ovarian and cervical cancers) to explore if they show the same trend that we found for breast cancer.
Cancer registry-based incidence comparison.
Gharbiah population-based cancer registry (GPCR), Tanta, Egypt.
All patients with uterine, ovarian and cervical cancer in GPCR from 1999 to 2002.
We calculated uterine, ovarian and cervical cancer incidence from 1999 to 2002. For each of the three cancers, we calculated the overall and age-specific rates for the province as a whole, and by urban-rural status, as well as for the eight districts of the province.
Incidence of all three cancer sites was higher in urban than in rural areas. Uterine cancer showed the highest urban-rural incidence rate ratio (IRR = 6.07, 95% CI = 4.17, 8.85). Uterine cancer also showed the highest urban incidence in the oldest age group (70+ age category, IRR = 14.39, 95% CI = 4.24, 48.87) and in developed districts (Tanta, IRR = 4.14, 95% CI = 0.41, 42.04). Incidence rates by groups of cancer sites showed an increasing gradient of urban incidence for cancers related to hormonal aetiology, mainly of the breast and uterus (IRR = 4.96, 95% CI = 2.86, 8.61).
The higher urban incidence of uterine cancer, coupled with our previous findings of higher incidence of breast cancer and estrogen receptor positive breast cancer in urban areas in this region, may be suggestive of possible higher exposure to environmental estrogenic compounds, such as xenoestrogens, in urban areas.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Subhojit Dey, Jul 01, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
141 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The global burden of cancer is rising with almost 70% of cancer cases being in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).The Middle East and Asia have two thirds of the world's population and the largest regional concentration of LMICs. Because of massive demographic and epidemiologic transitions, cancer mortality is projected to increase substantially in these populations. Lung cancer among men and breast cancer among women are the most prominent cancer sites in both the Middle East and Asia. Enhanced tobacco control and managing obesity are the most important measures for effective control of most cancers. However, detailed research is required within each population to best identify risk factors and to develop evidence-based methods for cancer prevention. International collaborations are an essential step in facilitating this process, because it can improve cancer registries, create robust infrastructure, improve skills of personnel and lead to effective cancer control and prevention.
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 07/2010; 22(3 Suppl):75S-82S. DOI:10.1177/1010539510372846 · 1.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Head and neck cancer (HNC) has been studied in different regions of the world but little is known about its incidence patterns in the Middle East and Egypt. In this study from Egypt's only population-based registry, we analyzed data from 1999 to 2006, to estimate incidence, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) categorized by age, district and subsites. Overall urban incidence of HNC was twice or more that of rural incidence for both males (IRR=2.59; 95% CI=2.26, 2.97) and females (IRR=2.00; 95% CI=1.64, 2.43). Highest urban-rural difference for males was seen in 40-49years (IRR=2.79; 95% CI=1.92, 4.05) and for females in 30-39years (IRR=2.94; 95% CI=1.60, 5.40). Among subsites, highest incidence among males was for larynx (1.53/10(5)) and among females for gum and mouth (0.48/10(5)). Maximum urban-rural difference in males was for paranasal sinus (IRR=4.66; 95% CI=1.88, 11.54) and in females for lip (IRR=8.91; 95% CI=1.89, 41.98). The study underscores the patterns of HNC incidence in Egypt while indicating the need for future analytical studies investigating specific risk factors of HNC in this population.
    Oral Oncology 08/2010; 46(8):591-6. DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.05.002 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated the variation in cancer incidence in Gharbiah, Egypt to explore geographic differences in relation to demographic and environmental exposures. Using data from the only population-based cancer registry of Gharbiah, we studied the 10 most common cancers in men and women over 4 years (1999-2002). Census data provided denominators and urban-rural definitions. Crude and adjusted incidence rates (IRs), incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Poisson regression. Incidence of all common cancers was higher among men than women and urban incidence was higher than rural incidence for all cancer sites. Among men and women urban-rural incidence difference was highest for prostate cancer (IRR=4.85, 95% CI=3.76, 6.26) and uterus (IRR=6.05, 95% CI=4.17, 8.78), respectively. Among men and women, El-Santa district had the highest urban-rural difference within districts for laryngeal cancer (IRR=29.45, 95% CI=10.63, 81.61) and uterine cancer (IRR=15.98, 95% CI=2.69, 95.10), respectively. El-Santa also showed the highest urban incidence among all eight districts for most cancer sites. Geographic differences of cancers in Gharbiah need in-depth investigation with respect to specific environmental factors that explain the geographic cancer in this region.
    10/2010; 35(3):254-64. DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2010.09.010