Article

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once-daily arbekacin during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients.

Department of Clinical Pharmacotherapy, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy (impact factor: 1.8). 12/2009; 15(6):420-3. DOI:10.1007/s10156-009-0717-5 pp.420-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examined the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and assessed the pharmacodynamics to consider arbekacin dosage adaptation in CVVHDF. Arbekacin was administered by 0.5-h infusion once daily, using a polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter, to three critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF; the flow rates were 0.8 l/h for the filtrate and 0.6 l/h for the dialysate. The drug concentrations in plasma and in the filtrate-dialysate were determined using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay and analyzed pharmacokinetically. The average sieving coefficient of arbekacin was 0.739 and the average drug clearance by CVVHDF was 1.03 l/h. A pharmacokinetic model with three compartments (1, central; 2, peripheral; 3, filtrate-dialysate side hemofilter) accurately reflected the concentration-time data for both plasma and filtrate-dialysate. The pharmacokinetic model assessed the pharmacodynamic profile of arbekacin once-daily regimens (0.5-h infusions) at filtrate-dialysate flow rates of 1.4 and 2.8 l/h, and demonstrated that only the 150-mg and 200-mg regimens achieved an effective target range for C(max) (9-20 microg/ml), suggesting that empirical dosages lower than the usual 150-200 mg should be avoided in patients undergoing CVVHDF. The minimum regimens needed to achieve an effective pharmacodynamic target for the free C(max)/MIC ratio (>8) were 75 mg for an MIC of 0.5 microg/ml, 200 mg for an MIC of 2 microg/ml, and 400 mg for an MIC of 4 microg/ml. These results will help us to better understand the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin during CVVHDF, while also helping in the selection of the appropriate arbekacin regimens, based on a pharmacodynamic assessment, for patients receiving this renal replacement therapy.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
36 Views

Keywords

0.5-h infusion
 
200-mg regimens
 
appropriate arbekacin regimens
 
arbekacin dosage adaptation
 
arbekacin once-daily regimens
 
average sieving coefficient
 
concentration-time data
 
continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration
 
effective pharmacodynamic target
 
effective target range
 
filtrate-dialysate flow rates
 
filtrate-dialysate side hemofilter
 
flow rates
 
fluorescence polarization immunoassay
 
free C(max)/MIC ratio
 
patients undergoing CVVHDF
 
pharmacokinetic model
 
pharmacokinetics
 
polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter
 
renal replacement therapy
 

Kazuro Ikawa