Article

A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment).

Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Pavia & Fondazione, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Blood (Impact Factor: 9.78). 12/2009; 115(9):1703-8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-245837
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Age older than 65 years, hemoglobin level lower than 100 g/L (10 g/dL), white blood cell count greater than 25 x 10(9)/L, peripheral blood blasts 1% or higher, and constitutional symptoms have been shown to predict poor survival in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) at diagnosis. To investigate whether the acquisition of these factors during follow-up predicts survival, we studied 525 PMF patients regularly followed. All 5 variables had a significant impact on survival when analyzed as time-dependent covariates in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and were included in 2 separate models, 1 for all patients (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System [DIPSS]) and 1 for patients younger than 65 years (age-adjusted DIPSS). Risk factors were assigned score values based on hazard ratios (HRs). Risk categories were low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high in both models. Survival was estimated by the HR. When shifting to the next risk category, the HR was 4.13 for low risk, 4.61 for intermediate-1, and 2.54 for intermediate-2 according to DIPSS; 3.97 for low risk, 2.84 for intermediate-1, and 1.81 for intermediate-2 according to the age-adjusted DIPSS. The novelty of these models is the prognostic assessment of patients with PMF anytime during their clinical course, which may be useful for treatment decision-making.

0 Followers
 · 
109 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Polycythemia vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal expansion of a hematopoietic progenitor, erythrocytosis, often leukocytosis and/or thrombocytosis, and nearly always an activating mutation in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2). The PV symptom burden can be considerable, in part driven by small or large vessel thrombotic tendency, splenomegaly, fatigue, pruritus, and a chronic risk of disease transformation to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia. In addition, patients with PV have an increased risk of mortality compared with the general population that often results from cardiovascular complications or disease transformation. Further, healthcare utilization and costs are higher in patients with PV than noncancer controls. First-line therapy options for high-risk patients may effectively manage PV in some instances; however, some patients do not receive adequate benefit from current treatment options and experience a more severe disease burden as a result. This may be especially true for those patients who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea or interferon-based therapies. New treatments currently being investigated in phase 3 clinical trials may alleviate disease burden in this patient population.
    Annals of Hematology 10/2014; 93(12). DOI:10.1007/s00277-014-2205-y · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To predict leukemic transformation (LT) we evaluated easily detectable diagnostic parameters in 338 patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) followed in the Latium region (Italy) between 1981 and 2010. Forty patients (11.8%) progressed to leukemia, with a resulting 10-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates of 72%. Hb (≤ 10 gr/dL), and circulating blasts (≥ 1%) were the only two independent prognostic for LT at the multivariate analysis. Two hundred-fifty patients with both the two parameters available were grouped as follows: low risk (none or one factor) = 216 patients; high risk (both factors) = 31 patients. The median LFS times were 269 and 45 months for the low and high-risk groups, respectively (P < 0001). The LT predictive power of these two parameters was confirmed in an external series of 270 PMF patients from Tuscany, in whom the median LFS was not reached and 61 months for the low and high risk groups, respectively (P<.0001). These results establish anemia and circulating blasts, two easily and universally available parameters, as strong predictors of LT in PMF and may help to improve prognostic stratification of these patients particularly in countries with low resources where more sophisticated molecular testing is unavailable.
    Leukemia Research 01/2015; 39(3). DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2015.01.001 · 2.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated the incidence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic impact of calreticulin (CALR) mutations in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) patients. In all, 48 ET and 14 PMF patients were enrolled, and the presence of CALR mutations was analyzed by direct sequencing. Patients were classified into three subgroups according to Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F and CALR mutation status, and their clinical features and prognosis were compared. CALR mutations were detected in 15 (24.2%) patients, and the incidence increased to 50.0% in 30 JAK2 V617F mutation-negative cases. These included 11 patients with three known mutations (c.1092_1143del [seven cases], c.1154_1155insTTGTC [three cases], and c.1102_1135del [one case]) and 4 patients with novel mutations. ET patients carrying CALR mutation were younger, had lower white blood cell counts, and experienced less thrombosis during follow-up than those carrying JAK2 V617F mutation, while both patient groups showed similar clinical features and prognosis. In ET patients without JAK2 V617F mutation, CALR mutation did not significantly affect clinical manifestation and prognosis. In conclusion, CALR mutation analysis could be a useful diagnostic tool for ET and PMF in 50% of the cases without JAK2 V617F mutations. The prognostic impact of CALR mutations needs further investigation.
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine 03/2015; 35(2):233-7. DOI:10.3343/alm.2015.35.2.233 · 1.48 Impact Factor

Similar Publications