Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma occurring with a melanocytic proliferation, masquerading as a nonhealing ulcer with reactive changes
ABSTRACT Two of the most challenging areas in dermatopathology are lymphoproliferative disorders and melanocytic lesions. We present a case of peripheral T-cell lymphoma occurring with an intradermal melanocytic proliferation. A 63-year-old Caucasian man presented with a 12-cm edematous, erythematous to violaceous, scalp ulceration that had enlarged over six months. Previous biopsies showed reactive changes which were concerning for infection. The last biopsies showed small to intermediate sized, angulated cells with clear cytoplasm within the dermis, with extension into the epidermis. These cells stained positive with markers for CD3, CD45RO and CD43, yet showed decreased expression of pan-T-cell markers CD5 and CD7, and absent expression of CD4, CD8, CD56 and CD57 and EBV. Molecular studies showed a clonal T-cell receptor gamma chain gene rearrangement. The diagnosis was peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified. Another biopsy from an indurated area separate from the ulcer showed scattered, enlarged cells embedded in the same lymphocytic infiltrate. No mitotic figures were identified. These cells stained for S100 and Melan-A, in a partly nested arrangement. This was felt to represent a melanocytic nevus. This case likely represents an extraordinary coincidence of two distinctly different neoplasms.
SourceAvailable from: Michael J Murphy[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Accurate evaluation of patients with suspected or known cutaneous lymphoma requires the integration of many sources and types of information, including clinical evaluation, microscopic analysis of tissue, immunophenotyping, gene rearrangement studies, clinical staging, and longitudinal observation. Diagnoses should be based on knowledge of specific lymphoma types as described in modern classification systems. Management of patients with cutaneous lymphoma requires collaboration among dermatologists, dermatopathologists, hematopathologists, and medical, surgical and radiation oncologists. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:325-57.) LEARNING OBJECTIVE: At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should better understand how to evaluate and manage patients for suspected or established lymphoma of the skin. Components include the clinical history and physical examination, optimal biopsy and tissue handling, interpretation of pathology and adjunctive test results, clinicopathologic correlation, and therapy. Participants should also understand the basis for establishing a specific diagnosis of cutaneous lymphoma based on current classification and staging.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 04/2002; 46(3):325-57; quiz, 358-60. DOI:10.1067/mjd.2002.121355 · 5.00 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Over the past 2 decades both cutaneous melanoma (CM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) incidence rates have increased substantially. One approach to better understanding the etiologic basis for these increases is to examine the risk of NHL in CM survivors and the risk of CM in NHL survivors. To explore the possible association between CM and NHL, the authors followed cohorts of CM and NHL patients registered through the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between 1973 and 1996 and identified patients who developed CM after NHL and NHL after CM. The number of observed cases then were compared with the number of expected cases to see if CM survivors were at an increased risk of NHL or if NHL survivors were at an increased risk of CM. Between 1973 and 1996, 54,803 CM patients and 62,597 NHL patients who met the authors' inclusion criteria were identified through SEER. The authors found statistically significant elevated risks of NHL among CM survivors (standardized incidence ratio [SIR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.63) and CM among NHL survivors (SIR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.48-2.07). These results support an association between CM and NHL. Although detection bias and posttherapy effects may explain part of this association, shared genetic or etiologic factors, such as sunlight exposure, also may play a role.Cancer 03/2001; 91(4):874-80. DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(20010215)91:43.0.CO;2-O · 4.90 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders is one of the most difficult areas in dermatopathology, and biopsies are often taken to rule out a cutaneous lymphoma in patients with "unclear" or "therapy-resistant" skin lesions. Histopathological features alone often enable a given case to be classified to a diagnostic group (eg, epidermotropic lymphomas), but seldom allow a definitive diagnosis to be made. Performing several biopsies from morphologically different lesions is suggested, especially in patients with suspicion of mycosis fungoides. Immunohistochemistry is often crucial for proper classification of the cases, but in some instances is not helpful (eg, early lesions of mycosis fungoides). Although molecular techniques provide new, powerful tools for diagnosing cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders, results of molecular methods should always be interpreted with the clinicopathological features, keeping in mind the possibility of false positivity and false negativity. In many cases, a definitive diagnosis can be made only on careful correlation of the clinical with the histopathological, immunophenotypical and molecular features.Journal of Clinical Pathology 09/2006; 59(8):813-26. DOI:10.1136/jcp.2005.033019 · 2.55 Impact Factor