Adaptive estimation of covariance functions via wavelet thresholding and information projection

Source: OAI

ABSTRACT In this paper, we study the problem of nonparametric adaptive estimation of the covariance function of a stationary Gaussian process. For this purpose, we consider a wavelet-based method which combines the ideas of wavelet approximation and estimation by information projection in order to warrants the positive semidefiniteness property of the solution. The spectral density of the process is estimated by projecting the wavelet thresholding expansion of the periodogram onto a family of exponential functions. This ensures that the spectral density estimator is a strictly positive function. Then, by Bochner theorem, we obtain a semidefinite positive estimator of the covariance function. The theoretical behavior of the estimator is established in terms of rate of convergence of the Kullback-Leibler discrepancy over Besov classes. We also show the excellent practical performance of the estimator in some numerical experiments.

  • Annals of Mathematics · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: . In this paper we consider logspline density estimation for random variables which are contaminated with random noise. In the logspline density estimation for data without noise, the logarithm of an unknown density function is estimated by a polynomial spline, the unknown parameters of which are given by maximum likelihood. When noise is present, B-splines and the Fourier inversion formula are used to construct the logspline density estimator of the unknown density function. Rates of convergence are established when the log-density function is assumed to be in a Besov space. It is shown that convergence rates depend on the smoothness of the density function and the decay rate of the characteristic function of the noise. Simulated data are used to show the finite-sample performance of inference based on the logspline density estimation.
    Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 02/1999; 26(1):73-86. · 1.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Advances in Applied Probability 01/1973; · 0.90 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014