Article

Showing Your Work: Impact of annotating electronic prescriptions with decision support results.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, 2209 Garland Ave., Room 428, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Journal of Biomedical Informatics (Impact Factor: 2.13). 12/2009; 43(2):321-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.11.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT e-Prescribing systems with decision support do not routinely communicate an adequate amount of information regarding the prescribers' decision to pharmacists. To address this communication gap in the e-prescribing process, we implemented a system called Show Your Work (SYW) that appends alerts and override comments to e-prescriptions generated by an e-prescribing system. To assess the quantitative impact of this system, we conducted a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study to assess pharmacy callback rates and types, and to uncover any unintended consequences of the annotations. Each day, SYW output across the enterprise was turned "on" or "off" randomly for all e-prescriptions. A convenience sample of three pharmacies, blinded to SYW status, submitted callback logs each day. These logs were used to calculate the rate of and reason for callbacks. At the conclusion of the study, we surveyed the 50 most frequently used pharmacies in our area to assess the impact of SYW on satisfaction and communication. A total of 202 callbacks had occurred yielding a callback rate of 45 callbacks/1000 prescriptions for SYW "on" days and 40 callbacks/1000 prescriptions for "off" days (p=0.4). We received 38 surveys (76% response rate) with 33 respondents commenting about SYW. Most respondents agreed (69%) that SYW favorably impacted callbacks--especially with pediatric prescriptions (82%). Comments suggested that SYW increased callbacks where necessary and decreased them in other situations, but did not contribute to unnecessary callbacks. These findings support the continued and potentially expanded use of SYW by e-prescribing systems to enhance communication with pharmacists.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
80 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: As a result of the US Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA '90), pharmacists have the obligation to ensure that prescription orders are appropriate and are not likely to cause adverse events. However, patient diagnosis information is not a requirement for a legal prescription order in any state in the US. OBJECTIVE: To compare a pharmacist's interventions before and after patient diagnosis is added by prescribers to their electronic prescription orders. METHODS: This prospective, pre-post study was conducted during two consecutive 4-week periods in a community health center pharmacy. During the first data collection period, the clinical pharmacist prospectively evaluated e-prescriptions using a standard DUR protocol. All problematic prescriptions were documented using a medication intervention form. During the second data collection period, providers included the patient's diagnosis on each e-prescription and the same clinical pharmacist again evaluated prescribed therapy and documented interventions. RESULTS: Pharmacist intervention rates on e-prescription orders were significantly lower following addition of the patient diagnosis information to the e-prescription order (3.9% pre- vs. 1.0% post-, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While preliminary, the results of this pilot suggest that the addition of patient diagnosis to the e-prescription order can reduce confusion and uncertainty on the part of a DUR pharmacist, thereby decreasing the overall number of interventions and the subsequent number of contacts with prescribers.
    Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 05/2013; 10(1). DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.04.010 · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This technical report discusses recent advances in electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) systems, including the evidence base supporting their limitations and potential benefits. Specifically, this report acknowledges that there are limited but positive pediatric data supporting the role of e-prescribing in mitigating medication errors, improving communication with dispensing pharmacists, and improving medication adherence. On the basis of these data and on the basis of federal statutes that provide incentives for the use of e-prescribing systems, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends the adoption of e-prescribing systems with pediatric functionality. This report supports the accompanying policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics recommending the adoption of e-prescribing by pediatric health care providers.
    PEDIATRICS 03/2013; 131(4). DOI:10.1542/peds.2013-0193 · 5.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Describe optimal design attributes of clinical decision support (CDS) interventions for medication prescribing, emphasizing perceptual, cognitive and functional characteristics that improve human-computer interaction (HCI) and patient safety. METHODS: Findings from published reports on success, failures and lessons learned during implementation of CDS systems were reviewed and interpreted with regard to HCI and software usability principles. We then formulated design recommendations for CDS alerts that would reduce unnecessary workflow interruptions and allow clinicians to make informed decisions quickly, accurately and without extraneous cognitive and interactive effort. RESULTS: Excessive alerting that tends to distract clinicians rather than provide effective CDS can be reduced by designing only high severity alerts as interruptive dialog boxes and less severe warnings without explicit response requirement, by curating system knowledge bases to suppress warnings with low clinical utility and by integrating contextual patient data into the decision logic. Recommended design principles include parsimonious and consistent use of color and language, minimalist approach to the layout of information and controls, the use of font attributes to convey hierarchy and visual prominence of important data over supporting information, the inclusion of relevant patient data in the context of the alert and allowing clinicians to respond with one or two clicks. CONCLUSION: Although HCI and usability principles are well established and robust, CDS and EHR system interfaces rarely conform to the best known design conventions and are seldom conceived and designed well enough to be truly versatile and dependable tools. These relatively novel interventions still require careful monitoring, research and analysis of its track record to mature. Clarity and specificity of alert content and optimal perceptual and cognitive attributes, for example, are essential for providing effective decision support to clinicians.
    International Journal of Medical Informatics 03/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.003 · 2.72 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from