Experimental investigation of heat conduction mechanisms in nanofluids. Clue on clustering.

Key Laboratory of Enhanced Heat Transfer and Energy Conservation, Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510641, People's Republic of China.
Nano Letters (Impact Factor: 13.03). 12/2009; 9(12):4128-32. DOI: 10.1021/nl902358m
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Heat conduction mechanisms in nanofluids, fluids seeded with nanoparticles, have been extensively scrutinized in the past decades to explain some experimental observations of their enhanced thermal conductivity beyond the effective medium theory. Although many mechanisms such as Brownian motion, clustering, ballistic transport, and internanoparticle potential are speculated, experimental proof of any of the mechanisms has been difficult. Here, we investigate the mechanisms experimentally by thermal conductivity measurements and structural analysis for the same materials in both liquid and solid states. These studies strongly suggest that clustering holds the key to the thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report extremely large tunable thermal conductivity (k) in alkanes using inverse micellar templating and nanofillers. The thermal properties of n-hexadecane containing inverse micelles of different volume fractions (ϕ) have been studied during freezing and melting. The k enhancement between the solid and liquid phase in the presence of oleic acid, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, and sorbitan oleate inverse micelles (size ∼1.5−6 nm) are found to be 185, 119, and 111%, respectively. Unlike the conventional nanofluids, the k enhancement in micellar templated alkanes is perfectly reversible under repeated thermal cycling owing to the monodispersity and nonaggregating nature of micelles. Our results suggest that during the first-order phase transition, the inverse micelles with highly packed linear chain surfactant are pushed to the intercrystal boundaries of alkanes, thereby reducing the interfacial thermal resistance. The k contrasts in surface modified graphite nanofibers and multiwalled carbon nanotube in n-hexadecane at 15 °C for a ϕ ∼ 0.0039 are found to be 161 and 157%, respectively. The surface modified nanofillers dispersed in alkanes showed a higher thermal contrast compared to bare ones, owing to their uniform dispersibility in intercrystal regions. Our findings of the large thermal contrast using inexpensive surfactant micelles in alkane should have interesting applications in heat management.
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 06/2014; 118. · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: h i g h l i g h t s The thermal properties of a PCM with nanofibers are determined. The solid-phase thermal conductivity scales exponentially with volume fraction. The liquid-phase thermal conductivity is only enhanced beyond a critical percolation threshold. The nanoscale interface resistance depends on the nanoparticle's dimensionality. The thermal diffusivity and volumetric heat capacity of the nanoenhanced PCMs are found. a b s t r a c t In many studies, carbon nanoparticles with high values of thermal conductivity (10–3000 W/m K) have been embedded into phase change thermal energy storage materials (PCMs) in order to enhance their bulk thermal properties. While a great deal of work to date has focused on determining the effect of these nanoparticles on a PCM's solid phase thermal properties, little is known about their effect on its liquid phase thermal properties. Thus, in this study, the effect of implanting randomly oriented herringbone style graphite nanofibers (HGNF, average diameter = 100 nm, average length = 20 lm) on the bulk thermal properties of an organic paraffin PCM (IGI 1230A, T melt = 329.15 K) in both the solid and liquid phase is quantified. The bulk thermal conductivity, volumetric heat capacity and thermal diffusivity of HGNF/PCM nanocomposites are obtained as a function of temperature and HGNF volume loading level. It is found that the property enhancement varies significantly depending on the material phase. In order to explain the difference between solid and liquid phase thermal properties, heat flow at the nanoparti-cle–PCM and nanoparticle–nanoparticle interfaces is examined as a function of HGNF loading level and temperature. To do this, the solid and liquid phase thermal boundary resistances (TBRs) between the nanoparticles and the surrounding PCM and/or between contacting nanoparticles are found. Results sug-gest that the TBR at the HGNF–PCM interface is nearly double the TBR across the HGNF–HGNF interface in both solid and liquid phases. However, both the HGNF–PCM and HGNF–HGNF TBRs are at least an order of magnitude lower when the PCM is in its solid phase versus when the PCM is in its liquid phase. Finally, the effect of nanofiber concentration on the PCM's latent heat of fusion and melt temperature is investi-gated in order to determine the applicability of the HGNF/PCM nanocomposite in a wide variety of energy systems.
    Applied Energy 04/2014; In Press. · 4.78 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014