Article

Modulation of masseteric reflexes by simulated mastication.

Discipline of Physiology & Research Centre for Human Movement Control, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Journal of dental research (Impact Factor: 3.46). 12/2009; 89(1):61-5. DOI: 10.1177/0022034509352842
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is well-known that limb muscle reflexes are modulated during human movements. However, little is known about the existence of equivalent masticatory muscle reflex modulation. We hypothesized that masticatory reflexes would be modulated during chewing so that smooth masticatory movements occur. To examine this hypothesis, we studied the modulation of inhibitory reflexes evoked by periodontal mechanoreceptor activation and of excitatory reflexes evoked by muscle spindle activation during simulated mastication. In 28 participants, 1- and 2-N mechanical taps were delivered to the incisor. Reflex responses to these taps were examined in the average masseteric electromyogram. To differentiate between periodontal mechanoreceptor- and muscle-spindle-mediated reflex components, we performed experiments prior to, and in the presence of, periodontal anesthesia. Both periodontal mechanoreceptor and muscle spindle reflexes were reduced during simulated masticatory movements.

1 Bookmark
 · 
138 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The present study was designed to clarify whether the bilateral cooperation in the human periodontal-masseteric reflex (PMR) differs between central incisors and canines. Methods: Surface array electrodes were placed on the bilateral masseter muscles to simultaneously record the firing activities of single motor units from both sides in seven healthy adults. During light clenching, mechanical stimulation was applied to the right maxillary central incisor and canine to evoke the PMR. Unitary activity was plotted with respect to the background activity and firing frequency. The slope of the regression line (sRL) and the correlation coefficient (CC) between the central incisor and canine and the lateral differences between these values were compared. Results: There were significant differences in the sRL and CC, as well as lateral differences, between the central incisor- and canine-driven PMR. Discussion: These results suggest that the PMR differs depending on both the tooth position and laterality.
    Frontiers in Physiology 01/2012; 3:233.
  • Source
    Current Topics in Ionizing Radiation Research, 02/2012; , ISBN: 978-953-51-0196-3
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When jaw gape in unilateral biting or chewing narrows, the working/balancing side activity ratio (W/B ratio) of masseter muscles increases due to decrease of balancing side (BS) activity. This was interpreted as a neuromuscular strategy to delimit the impact of BS contacts during chewing. To test this hypothesis, we studied whether W/B ratios are associated with incidence of BS tooth contacts. In 40 healthy subjects, bilateral masseter activity was recorded during unilateral biting with different jaw gapes and during various chewing tasks. Biting was performed with absence and with deliberate avoidance or generation of BS tooth contacts. Subjects were divided into three groups according to jaw gapes of 2, 1, and 0.5 mm for which BS contact was first noticed in strong biting. The smaller this gape was, the higher were the mean W/B ratios. In biting with contact avoidance, the W/B ratios in each group increased with decreasing gape. In biting with generation of BS contacts, W/B ratios were smaller than with contact avoidance. W/B ratios in chewing with minimum interocclusal distances below 0.5 mm were bigger than in biting with contact generation and were mostly bigger than in biting with contact avoidance. The findings confirm that increasing the masseter W/B ratio is a neuromuscular measure suitable to avoid BS contacts and support the idea that motor control uses jaw gape-related activation to limit the impact of BS contacts. Clarification of this protection mechanism might contribute to uncover the etiology of functional disorders and occlusal malfunctions.
    Clinical Oral Investigations 03/2011; 16(2):421-8. · 2.20 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
65 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014