Article

The physiologic basis of spirometry

Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington KY 40536, USA.
Respiratory care (Impact Factor: 1.84). 12/2009; 54(12):1717-26.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Spirometry is the most useful and commonly available tests of pulmonary function. It is a physiological test that measures individual inhalation and exhalation volumes of air as a function of time. Pulmonologists and general-practice physicians commonly use spirometry in their offices in the assessment and management of lung disease. Spirometric indices are well validated and easily interpreted by comparison with established normal values. The remarkable reproducibility of spirometry results from the presence of compliant intrathoracic airways that act as air flow regulators during forced expiration. Because of this anatomic arrangement, expiratory flow becomes dependent solely on the elasticity of the lungs and airway resistance once a certain degree of expiratory force is exerted. Insight into this aspect of respiratory physiology can help in the interpretation of spirometry.

0 Followers
 · 
269 Views
  • Source
    • "Spirometry is the most useful and commonly available test of pulmonary function [1] . Prediction values are available only for conventional lung function devices using the mouth piece. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conventional oral spirometry is a commonly used test for respiratory functions. However, the nasal passages are the primary pathway for regulating ventilation and modulating ventilated air. Here, we tested the validity of using the nasal route (nasal spirometry) for the evaluation of respiratory functions. 250 healthy young adults (150 males and 100 females; 17 to 23 years of age) were subjected to two spirometry tests: oral spirometry by using a mouth piece and nasal spirometry by using a face mask. Measurement parameters included: Vital capacity (VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume first second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC%, Forced expiratory flow (FEF25/75%). and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV). In both males and females, only VC was significantly higher in nasal than oral spirometry, while FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC % FEF25/75% and MVV were significantly higher in oral than nasal spirometry. Prediction equations for different measurements of nasal spirometry were derived by multiple regression analysis using sex, height, and weight as independent variables. We conclude that nasal spirometry could be a valid procedure which may be more real in expressing normal respiratory functions.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The authors examined the extent to which socioeconomic position, behavior-related factors, cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and chronic diseases explain the association between poor lung function and mortality in 4,817 participants (68.9% men) from the Whitehall II Study aged 60.8 years (standard deviation, 5.9), on average. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was used to measure lung function in 2002-2004. A total of 139 participants died during a mean follow-up period of 6.4 years (standard deviation, 0.8). In a model adjusted for age and sex, being in the lowest tertile of FEV(1)/height(2) was associated with a 1.92-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.35, 2.73) increased risk of mortality compared with being in the top 2 tertiles. Once age, sex, and smoking history were taken into account, the most important explanatory factors for this association were inflammatory markers (21.3% reduction in the FEV(1)/height(2)-mortality association), coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes (11.7% reduction), and alcohol consumption, diet, physical activity, and body mass index (9.8% reduction). The contribution of socioeconomic position and cardiovascular risk factors was small (≤ 3.5% reduction). Taken together, these factors explained 32.5% of the association. Multiple pathways link lung function to mortality; these results show inflammatory markers to be particularly important.
    American journal of epidemiology 10/2010; 172(12):1415-23. DOI:10.1093/aje/kwq294 · 4.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Ethnic differences in lung function are recognized. However, most of the modern lung function equipments are pre-programmed with Caucasian reference values. Objective: Measure spirometric values among healthy Saudi male and female adults and compare with the Caucasian reference values in a standard spirometer. Methods: Thirty healthy Saudi young adults (15 males and 15 females; mean age 25 years) participated in this study. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC (%), and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) were recorded using a portable digital spirometer. Results: Mean values of FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC (%) and MVV for the Saudi subjects were significantly lower than the Caucasians predicted values. Conclusion: Interpretation of lung function tests of Saudi subjects based on the Caucasian prediction equations is generally not valid, as the parameters of lung function tests in Saudi subjects are lower than the Caucasian reference values. The present results underline an urgent need for larger studies to develop prediction equations based on normative spirometric values for Saudi population involving subjects of all ages and both genders living in different climates of the country. Brief communication (Original) Many studies have established the role of spirometery in understanding normal and pathological function of the respiratory system [1]. The data on lung function tests using spirometry help clinicians in screening, diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis assessment of respiratory function and dysfunction in different conditions and diseases affecting the airflow in lungs during respiration [2]. In addition, spirometry can be a helpful tool for evaluation of breathing reserve and exercise tolerance to determine physical fitness of healthy subjects [3]. Spirometry is not only a relatively inexpensive method, but it has been shown to be a reliable and reproducible technique to study lung function [4]. The measurement of air volumes during inhalation and exhalation as a function of time provides the physiological basis of spirometry [1]. Among many parameters using spirometry, most commonly used parameters are vital capacity (VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV). The VC is the maximum volume of air that can be expelled from the lungs after a maximum inspiration. FVC is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration, FEV1 is the maximum volume of air that can be forcibly blow out in the first second during the FVC manoeuvre. FEF25-75% is the average speed of air coming out of the lungs during the middle portion of the expiration. Finally, MVV is the maximum volume of air that can be inhaled and exhaled in one minute [5].
    Asian biomedicine 01/2011; 5:157-161. DOI:10.5372/1905-7415.0501.020 · 0.28 Impact Factor
Show more