Article

Ultrasound evidence of altered lumbar connective tissue structure in human subjects with chronic low back pain

Department of Neurology, Given Building, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Impact Factor: 1.9). 12/2009; 10:151. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-151
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although the connective tissues forming the fascial planes of the back have been hypothesized to play a role in the pathogenesis of chronic low back pain (LBP), there have been no previous studies quantitatively evaluating connective tissue structure in this condition. The goal of this study was to perform an ultrasound-based comparison of perimuscular connective tissue structure in the lumbar region in a group of human subjects with chronic or recurrent LBP for more than 12 months, compared with a group of subjects without LBP.
In each of 107 human subjects (60 with LBP and 47 without LBP), parasagittal ultrasound images were acquired bilaterally centered on a point 2 cm lateral to the midpoint of the L2-3 interspinous ligament. The outcome measures based on these images were subcutaneous and perimuscular connective tissue thickness and echogenicity measured by ultrasound.
There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index (BMI) or activity levels between LBP and No-LBP groups. Perimuscular thickness and echogenicity were not correlated with age but were positively correlated with BMI. The LBP group had approximately 25% greater perimuscular thickness and echogenicity compared with the No-LBP group (ANCOVA adjusted for BMI, p<0.01 and p<0.001 respectively).
This is the first report of abnormal connective tissue structure in the lumbar region in a group of subjects with chronic or recurrent LBP. This finding was not attributable to differences in age, sex, BMI or activity level between groups. Possible causes include genetic factors, abnormal movement patterns and chronic inflammation.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
245 Views
  • Source
    Der Schmerz 01/2014; 28(1). DOI:10.1007/s00482-013-1373-3 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design Two-group repeated-measures reliability study. Objectives Determine inter- and intra-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements of transverse abdominal (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (LM) muscle thickness during rest and contraction in low back pain (LBP) and healthy subjects over 3 consecutive days performed by an experienced and a novice rater. Background Previous reliability studies of TrA or LM thickness did not simultaneously account for muscle state, rater experience, and multi-day assessment in large subject samples. Methods The two raters measured TrA and LM thickness on 3 consecutive days in 42 healthy and 56 LBP subjects during rest and contraction, and calculated the thickness change from rest to contraction (%). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,k) and 95% minimal detectable differences (MDC95) were derived for single- (day 1) and average-measure (days 1-3) thickness. Results The inter-rater ICC2,1 for single-measure thickness (LBP 0.71-0.87, healthy 0.94-1.0) were similar to the ICC2,3 for average-measure thickness (LBP 0.73-0.84, healthy 0.93-1.0). Both inter-rater ICC2,1 and ICC2,3 were lower for the relative thickness change (0.61-0.96). Intra-rater ICC2,1 across 3 consecutive days were high for both raters across the groups (LBP 0.95-1.00, healthy 0.93-1.00), albeit lower for the relative thickness change (0.79-0.99). The MDC95 were <0.3 mm for TrA and <2.5 mm for LM (both <10% of average thickness). Conclusion Both experienced and trained novice raters provided reliable measurements of TrA and LM thickness in LBP and healthy subjects during rest and contraction. One-time measurements were similar to averaged measures. Small absolute errors were observed. Level of Evidence Diagnosis, level 2. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 3 November 2014. doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.5141.
    Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 11/2014; 44(12):1-34. DOI:10.2519/jospt.2014.5141 · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Treatments of fascial tissues have gain­ed in importance due to recent histological find­ings. Thus, a considerable demand for diagnostic tools has risen. This review aims to present the instruments most frequently employed for evaluating the efficacy of fascial treatments. Methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar were searched for publications on screen­ing or treatment of fascial tissues. Subsequently studies evaluating reliability and validity of the instruments employed in the studies of the first literature research were targeted. Results: To assess the success of interventions directed to fascia, pain scores, algometry, myotonometry, sonography and sono-elastography are utilized. Although both scores and algometry provide reliable measures, the results are tissue-unspecific and dependent on the subject’s impression. Likewise, myotonometry investigates a complex of different tissues. Sonography and sono-elastography do allow an isolated view on fascia. However, only the latter enables the examiner to quantify results. Discussion: A lack of specifity in providing information solely about fascia represents the main problem of the diagnostic instruments. Sono-Elastography is a promising method, but not applicable in each setting due to high acquisition costs and lack of standardization in measurements. Conclusions: Development and validation of screening tools for fascia continue to retain high relevance.
    Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin 06/2014; 24(3):117-124. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1370952 · 0.26 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
54 Downloads
Available from
May 17, 2014