Knee osteoarthritis. Efficacy of a new method of contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal ultrasonography in detection of synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany.
Annals of the rheumatic diseases (Impact Factor: 10.38). 01/2008; 67(1):19-25. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2007.067462
Source: PubMed


To develop a new method of digital synovial vascularisation quantification by using contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MUS) in detecting synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared with healthy subjects and MRI.
Evaluation of 41 patients with painful knee OA and 6 healthy subjects. The severity of knee pain was evaluated. All patients and all 6 healthy subjects underwent contrast medium-enhanced (CE)-MUS with SonoVue, and 36 patients additionally underwent CEMRI with Magnevist. Joint effusion, synovial thickening and pain were assessed and compared with B-mode and Power Doppler sonography (PDS) as well as contrast medium enhancement.
Pain evaluated by the visual analogue scale(VAS) hardly correlated with other markers of disease activity measured by ultrasound (US) in B-mode or MRI. US of the superior recess revealed an effusion or synovial thickening in 58%. PDS findings were positive in 63%, and CE-MUS in the superior knee recess was positive in 95%. MRI showed effusion in the superior recess in 61% and showed positive findings in 82% when using contrast medium. The kappa value was 0.48 between US and MRI with regard to the effusion in the superior recess, and 0.53 between PD signal in the superior recess and effusion in the superior recess by US. Using MRI as the reference standard, there was a sensitivity of 72% for assessing effusion in the superior recess and 81% for assessing effusion in the lateral recess.
Assessment of disease activity (synovitis) in knee OA by VAS is not sufficient. US PDS was more sensitive than B-mode, and CE-MUS was more sensitive than PDS and CE-MRI in detecting synovitis in patients with painful knee OA. Also, CE-MRI was more sensitive in detecting inflammatory changes in the superior recess than without contrast medium. Using CE-MUS and performing time/intensity analysis has shown to be a good model for evaluation of an inflammatory process in the setting of knee OA in the superior recess.

Download full-text


Available from: Kay-Geert A Hermann,
  • Source
    • "Recent studies have shown that signal changes in Hoffa's fat pad on non-CE MRI were less specific for peripatellar synovitis than CE sequences [133] and that microscopic synovitis is not correlated with non-CE MRI [134]. Additional investigations have shown that CE-MRI detected synovitis correlates with histology [113] [134] and is more sensitive [125] and specific [133] than non-CE MRI. These studies further the belief that Gdbased CE-MRI improves imaging of the synovium. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, debilitating joint disease characterized by degenerative changes to the bones, cartilage, menisci, ligaments, and synovial tissue. Imaging modalities such as radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ultrasound (US) permit visualization of these structures and can evaluate disease onset and progression. Radiography is primarily useful for the assessment of bony structures, while OCT is used for evaluation of articular cartilage and US for ligaments and the synovium. MRI permits visualization of all intraarticular structures and pathologies, though US or OCT may be preferential in some circumstances. As OA is a disease of the whole joint, a combination of imaging techniques may be necessary in order to gain the most comprehensive picture of the disease state. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Osteoarthritis".
    Bone 12/2011; 51(2):278-88. DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2011.11.019 · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Therefore, PDUS was used as the standard reference method in this study. Song et al. [16] reported on a greater sensitivity of CEUS in the detection of vascularity in comparison to contrast-enhanced MRI in examining patients with knee osteoarthritis. They admitted that the objective quantification (calculated slope values) were not directly comparable. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We sought to assess vascularity in wrist tenosynovitis by using power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) and to compare detection of intra- and peritendinous vascularity with that of contrast-enhanced grey-scale ultrasound (CEUS). Twenty-six tendons of 24 patients (nine men, 15 women; mean age ± SD, 54.4 ± 11.8 years) with a clinical diagnosis of tenosynovitis were examined with B-mode ultrasonography, PDUS, and CEUS by using a second-generation contrast agent, SonoVue (Bracco Diagnostics, Milan, Italy) and a low-mechanical-index ultrasound technique. Thickness of synovitis, extent of vascularized pannus, intensity of peritendinous vascularisation, and detection of intratendinous vessels was incorporated in a 3-score grading system (grade 0 to 2). Interobserver variability was calculated. With CEUS, a significantly greater extent of vascularity could be detected than by using PDUS (P < 0.001). In terms of peri- and intratendinous vessels, CEUS was significantly more sensitive in the detection of vascularization compared with PDUS (P < 0.001). No significant correlation between synovial thickening and extent of vascularity could be found (P = 0.089 to 0.097). Interobserver reliability was calculated to be excellent when evaluating the grading score (κ = 0.811 to 1.00). CEUS is a promising tool to detect tendon vascularity with higher sensitivity than PDUS by improved detection of intra- and peritendinous vascularity.
    Arthritis research & therapy 11/2010; 12(6):R209. DOI:10.1186/ar3185 · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • Source

Show more