Article

Antidepressant medication adherence: a study of primary care patients.

Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 01/2009; 11(5):205-11. DOI: 10.4088/PCC.08m00694
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Nonadherence to antidepressant medication significantly contributes to the undertreatment of depression in primary care populations. The purpose of this study was to survey primary care patients' adherence to antidepressant medication to better understand factors associated with nonadherence.
Participants with a history of being prescribed an antidepressant for at least 4 weeks were recruited from a primary care research network. Subjects completed a demographic survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, the Stages of Change Scale, the Medication Adherence Scale, and the MOS measure of adherence. Differences between adherent and nonadherent patients were compared using chi(2) for discrete variables, independent t tests for continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for rank-ordered data. Data were collected from April 1, 2001 to April 1, 2004.
Approximately 80% (N = 148) of individuals approached for this study agreed to participate. The overall sample was primarily white and female. The PHQ diagnoses at study entry were dysthymic disorder (8.8%, n = 13), major depressive disorder (31.8%, n = 47), "double depression" (both dysthymic disorder and major depressive disorder, 29.7%, n = 44), and no depression (16.2%, n = 24.) The mean BDI-II score for the total sample was 19.9. Nonadherent patients reported being more careless about taking their medications, were more worried about side effects, were less satisfied with their physicians, were under the age of 40 years, and were more likely to have asked for a specific antidepressant. Nonadherent patients also indicated being at lower stages of change.
Individually tailoring education to patient preference and stage of change is recommended to promote adherence.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Denis Lynch, Jan 16, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
139 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When treatments are ordered for adolescent major depression, or for other adolescent medical illnesses, adherence and clinical outcomes are likely to be unsatisfactory, unless 4 basic principles of the medical treatment of adolescent illness are implemented. These comprise providing effective patient and parent/caregiver education, establishing effective patient and caregiver therapeutic alliances, providing effective treatment, and managing other factors associated with treatment adherence as indicated. The goals of treatment are to achieve the earliest possible response and remission. Failure to treat adolescent major depression successfully has potentially serious consequences, including worsened adherence, long-term morbidity, and suicide attempt. Accordingly, prescribed treatment must be aggressively managed. Doses of an antidepressant medication should be increased as rapidly as can be tolerated, preferably every 1-2 weeks, until full remission is achieved or such dosing is limited by the emergence of unacceptable adverse effects. A full range of medication treatment options must be employed if necessary. Treatment adherence, occurrence of problematic adverse effects, clinical progress, and safety must be systematically monitored. Adolescents with major depression must be assessed for risk of harm to self or others. When this risk appears significant, likelihood of successful outcomes will be enhanced by use of treatment plans that comprehensively address factors associated with treatment nonadherence. Abbreviated and comprehensive plans for the treatment of potentially fatal adolescent illnesses are outlined in this review.
    Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics 08/2010; 1:73-85. DOI:10.2147/AHMT.S8791
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To identify specific quantitative and qualitative factors that govern the decision to adhere or decline antidepressant medication in antenatal women with moderate-to-severe mood and anxiety disorders. METHODS: Fifty women (30 adherers, 20 decliners) were recruited between 18 and 34 weeks gestation in a tertiary care clinic for perinatal mothers. They were prospectively monitored 4 weeks apart up to 1-month postpartum on the: Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Hamilton Depression Scale, Mood Disorders Insight Scale, Antidepressant Compliance Questionnaire, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, and NEO Personality Inventory. Qualitative interviews were conducted at baseline. Hierarchical linear modeling determined illness trajectories of the two groups. RESULTS: Significantly different course of illness was observed in adherers versus decliners. Adherers had healthier attitudes toward depression and compliance with medication (P < .005). Decliners had less illness insight (P < .001) and cited fear of fetal exposure, and thought medication was unwarranted. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women experienced significantly divergent illness trajectories depending on if they accepted antidepressant medication therapy for their illness. Risk perception, attitudes, and illness insight impacted decisions surrounding adherence and decline.
    Depression and Anxiety 11/2013; 30(11). DOI:10.1002/da.22137 · 4.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nonadherence in mood disorders poses a significant obstacle to remission and recovery. A comprehensive approach that includes evidence-based strategies have been shown to improve adherence customized to the individual needs of the patient resulting in improved quality of life and reduced disease burden. This is further strengthened by identifying risk factors, establishing therapeutic alliances, and educating patients, families and other healthcare providers.
    03/2011; 4(1):22-5. DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2010.10.005