Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Intervention for Toddlers With Autism: The Early Start Denver Model

Autism Speaks, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.47). 11/2009; 125(1):e17-23. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0958
Source: PubMed


To conduct a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM), a comprehensive developmental behavioral intervention, for improving outcomes of toddlers diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Forty-eight children diagnosed with ASD between 18 and 30 months of age were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: (1) ESDM intervention, which is based on developmental and applied behavioral analytic principles and delivered by trained therapists and parents for 2 years; or (2) referral to community providers for intervention commonly available in the community.
Compared with children who received community-intervention, children who received ESDM showed significant improvements in IQ, adaptive behavior, and autism diagnosis. Two years after entering intervention, the ESDM group on average improved 17.6 standard score points (1 SD: 15 points) compared with 7.0 points in the comparison group relative to baseline scores. The ESDM group maintained its rate of growth in adaptive behavior compared with a normative sample of typically developing children. In contrast, over the 2-year span, the comparison group showed greater delays in adaptive behavior. Children who received ESDM also were more likely to experience a change in diagnosis from autism to pervasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified, than the comparison group.
This is the first randomized, controlled trial to demonstrate the efficacy of a comprehensive developmental behavioral intervention for toddlers with ASD for improving cognitive and adaptive behavior and reducing severity of ASD diagnosis. Results of this study underscore the importance of early detection of and intervention in autism.

Download full-text


Available from: Jennifer A Gerdts,
  • Source
    • "Behavioral interventions are increasingly acknowledged as an effective way of working with, and educating, individuals with autism. There is evidence for the effectiveness of early intensive behavioural interventions (EIBI) (Dawson et al., 2010; Eldevik et al., 2012), and of comprehensive ABA based intervention for older children in home (Eldevik et al., 2009) and school settings (Grindle et al., 2012). However, whilst many have benefitted from behavioral interventions, individual child outcomes vary (Howlin et al., 2009; Remington et al., 2007; Whiteford, Blacklock, & Perry, 2012) and this is the case within, as well as across studies. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With an increase in large scale Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) services for children with autism, the need to define and measure quality is essential. Staff competence is key and identifying and measuring this accurately is critical. ABA service providers typically measure competence by direct observation, video analysis, and written examination. However, apart from the York Measure of Quality of Intensive Behavioural Intervention (YMQI) there is an interesting lack of direct links between defining competencies and developing assessment tools. In this study we used three measures of competencies developed from the UK ABA Autism Education Competence Framework Level 1. Along with the YMQI we assessed their construct validity by comparing the performance of two groups of tutors working in a school for children with autism ("experienced" vs. "inexperienced") and performance of the "inexperienced" group at baseline (T1) and following one year of competence based training (T2). Results revealed that the more experienced group in both the between group and longitudinal comparisons achieved higher scores supporting the construct validity of the measures. There were few associations between the different methods of assessing competence, suggesting that no measure should be used in isolation if competence is to be comprehensively assessed.
    Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 12/2015; 20:67-77. DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2015.08.008 · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a developmental disorder that is typically diagnosed between 2 and 4 years of age [American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Volkmar et al., 2014]. Early diagnosis of ASD may allow for implementation of early interventions [Dawson et al., 2010]. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) have been used to study auditory function of children with ASD [Rosenhall, Nordin, Brantberg, & Gillberg, 2003; Roth, Muchnik, Shabtai, Hildesheimer, & Henkin, 2012], and to date, several studies have reported that children with ASD exhibit prolonged ABR latencies in comparison to controls [Dabbous, 2012; Fujikawa-Brooks, Isenberg, Osann, Spence, & Gage, 2010; Kwon, Kim, Choe, Ko, & Park, 2007; Maziade et al., 2000; Rosenhall et al., 2003; Russo, Hornickel, Nicol, Zecker, & Kraus, 2010; Tas et al., 2007; Thivierge, B edard, C^ ot e, & Maziade, 1990; Wong & Wong, 1991], while others have found no such relationship [Courchesne, Courchesne, Hicks, & Lincoln, 1985; Tharpe et al., 2006]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Numerous studies have attempted to identify early physiological abnormalities in infants and toddlers who later develop autism spectrum disorder (ASD). One potential measure of early neurophysiology is the auditory brainstem response (ABR), which has been reported to exhibit prolonged latencies in children with ASD. We examined whether prolonged ABR latencies appear in infancy, before the onset of ASD symptoms, and irrespective of hearing thresholds. To determine how early in development these differences appear, we retrospectively examined clinical ABR recordings of infants who were later diagnosed with ASD. Of the 118 children in the participant pool, 48 were excluded due to elevated ABR thresholds, genetic aberrations, or old testing age, leaving a sample of 70 children: 30 of which were tested at 0–3 months, and 40 were tested at toddlerhood (1.5–3.5 years). In the infant group, the ABR wave-V was significantly prolonged in those who later developed ASD as compared with case-matched controls (n530). Classification of infants who later developed ASD and case-matched controls using this measure enabled accurate identification of ASD infants with 80% specificity and 70% sensitivity. In the group of toddlers with ASD, absolute and interpeak latencies were prolonged compared to clinical norms. Findings indicate that ABR latencies are significantly prolonged in infants who are later diagnosed with ASD irrespective of their hearing thresholds; suggesting that abnormal responses might be detected soon after birth. Further research is needed to determine if ABR might be a valid marker for ASD risk.
    Autism Research 10/2015; DOI:10.1002/aur.1561 · 4.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "With deficits in joint attention, the ability to coordinate attention between social partners and objects (Mundy and Burnette 2005), students with ASD experience deficits in social connectedness as they are less likely to look at faces or respond and attend to relevant classroom instruction than their peers. In addition, difficulty understanding and initiating nonverbal and verbal communication limit reciprocal interaction and may interfere with successful participation in classroom discussion (Dawson et al. 2004; Mundy and Burnette 2005; Rotheram-Fuller et al. 2010). Many verbal students with ASD may exhibit inflexible language and show a lack of generativity, with language consisting primarily of scripted words and phrases (APA 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the classroom measure of active engagement (CMAE), an observational tool designed to measure active engagement in students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Participants included 196 students with ASD and their educators (n = 126) who were video-recorded at the beginning of the school year. Findings documented limited active engagement overall, with students spending less than half of the observation well-regulated, productive, or independent and infrequently directing eye gaze and communicating. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the structure of the CMAE was represented by a 5-factor model. These findings underscore the need for improved active engagement in students with ASD and show promise for a tool to measure behaviors associated with positive educational outcomes in students with ASD.
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 10/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10803-015-2615-2 · 3.34 Impact Factor
Show more