Article

A conserved gene regulatory network subcircuit drives different developmental fates in the vegetal pole of highly divergent echinoderm embryos

Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Developmental Biology (Impact Factor: 3.64). 11/2009; 340(2):200-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.11.020
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Comparisons of orthologous developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from different organisms explain how transcriptional regulation can, or cannot, change over time to cause morphological evolution and stasis. Here, we examine a subset of the GRN connections in the central vegetal pole mesoderm of the late sea star blastula and compare them to the GRN for the same embryonic territory of sea urchins. In modern sea urchins, this territory gives rise to skeletogenic mesoderm; in sea stars, it develops into other mesodermal derivatives. Orthologs of many transcription factors that function in the sea urchin skeletogenic mesoderm are co-expressed in the sea star vegetal pole, although this territory does not form a larval skeleton. Systematic perturbation of erg, hex, tbr, and tgif gene function was used to construct a snapshot of the sea star mesoderm GRN. A comparison of this network to the sea urchin skeletogenic mesoderm GRN revealed a conserved, recursively wired subcircuit operating in both organisms. We propose that, while these territories have evolved different functions in sea urchins and sea stars, this subcircuit is part of an ancestral GRN governing echinoderm vegetal pole mesoderm development. The positive regulatory feedback between these transcription factors may explain the conservation of this subcircuit.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Veronica F Hinman, Jul 14, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
81 Views
  • Source
    • "A related goal is to establish whether this regulatory architecture is deployed whenever gcm/six1 co-expression exists in this species. The coelomic rudiment cells of pluteus larva provide a good candidate for additional study, as mRNAs for both genes have been detected there by WMISH (McCauley et al., 2010; Poustka et al., 2007). Another instance deserving additional investigation arises from the cloning of six1 from an adult coelomocyte cDNA library (Cameron et al., 2000), coupled with the enriched gcm expression in an adult coelomocyte type, the echinochrome-containing red spherule cells (J. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The glial cells missing (gcm) regulatory gene of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus is first expressed in veg2 daughter cells as the genomic target of late cleavage stage Delta-Notch signaling from the skeletogenic mesoderm precursors. Gcm is required in veg2 progeny during late cleavages for the early phase of pigment cell precursor specification. Here we report on a later acting cis-regulatory module that assumes control of gcm expression by the early mesenchyme blastula stage and maintains it through pigment cell differentiation and dispersal. Cis-perturbation analyses reveal that the two critical elements within this late module are consensus matches to Gcm and Six1 binding sites. Significantly, six1 mRNA localizes to gcm+cells from the mesenchyme blastula stage onwards. Trans-perturbations with anti-sense morpholinos reveal a co-dependency between six1 and gcm. Six1 mRNA levels fall sharply after Gcm is depleted, while depleting Six1 leads to significant reductions in output of endogenous gcm or modular-reporters. These results support the conclusion gcm and six1 comprise a positive intergenic feedback loop in the mesodermal GRN. This often employed cross regulatory GRN feature here ensures self-sustaining gcm output in a cohort of fully specified pigment cell precursors at a relatively early developmental stage.
    Developmental Biology 04/2012; 364(2):259-67. DOI:10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.02.003 · 3.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "These features, and developmental canalization due to the upstream position of such kernels in the body part GRN, explain their exceptional evolutionary conservation. Examples include what may be a pan-bilaterian (i.e., from flies to mice) kernel for heart specification (Davidson, 2006); and an (at least) pan-echinoderm kernel underlying mesoderm specification in both sea urchin and sea star development ((McCauley et al., 2010); these lineages have not shared a common ancestor since the end of the Cambrian). Similarly, a fundamental Box II subcircuit may underlie mesoderm specification in vertebrate embryogenesis (Swiers et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evolutionary change in animal morphology results from alteration of the functional organization of the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that control development of the body plan. A major mechanism of evolutionary change in GRN structure is alteration of cis-regulatory modules that determine regulatory gene expression. Here we consider the causes and consequences of GRN evolution. Although some GRN subcircuits are of great antiquity, other aspects are highly flexible and thus in any given genome more recent. This mosaic view of the evolution of GRN structure explains major aspects of evolutionary process, such as hierarchical phylogeny and discontinuities of paleontological change.
    Cell 03/2011; 144(6):970-85. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.017 · 33.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The connection between the evolution of developmental GRN to the evolution of diverse body plans is more and more evident as models of GRNs of diverse organisms become available (Davidson and Erwin, 2009; Erwin and Davidson, 2009). It is now apparent that different parts of GRNs evolve at a different pace and some parts are more conserved then others (Hinman et al., 2003; Hinman and Davidson, 2007; Davidson and Erwin, 2009; Erwin and Davidson, 2009; McCauley et al., 2010). Here we focused on one regulatory gene and tried to understand the reasons for its highly conserved developmental role and whether its regulation is as conserved as its role. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Foxa is a forkhead transcription factor that is expressed in the endoderm lineage across metazoans. Orthologs of foxa are expressed in cells that intercalate, polarize, and form tight junctions in the digestive tracts of the mouse, the sea urchin, and the nematode and in the chordate notochord. The loss of foxa expression eliminates these morphogenetic processes. The remarkable similarity in foxa phenotypes in these diverse organisms raises the following questions: why is the developmental role of Foxa so highly conserved? Is foxa transcriptional regulation as conserved as its developmental role? Comparison of the regulation of foxa orthologs in sea urchin and in Caenorhabditis elegans shows that foxa transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between these two organisms, particularly in the cells that contribute to the C. elegans pharynx formation. We suggest that the similarity of foxa phenotype is due to its role in an ancestral gene regulatory network that controlled intercalation followed by mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition. foxa transcriptional regulation had evolved to support the developmental program in each species so foxa would play its role controlling morphogenesis at the necessary embryonic address.
    Developmental Biology 12/2010; 357(1):21-6. DOI:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.11.027 · 3.64 Impact Factor
Show more