Article
Prognostic role of vasculogenic mimicry in colorectal cancer.
Angiogenesis Laboratory, Research Institute for Growth and Development (GROW), University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (impact factor:
3.13).
12/2009;
52(12):2028-35.
DOI:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181beb4ff
pp.2028-35
Source: PubMed
-
Article: Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale.
Gastroenterology 11/1997; 113(4):1423-4. · 11.68 Impact Factor -
Article: pTNM and residual tumor classifications: problems of assessment and prognostic significance.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The anatomic extent of tumor (TNM, pTNM) and, in case of treatment, the residual tumor status following treatment (residual tumor, or R classification) are the strongest predictors for outcome of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The results of the pTNM and the R classifications depend on the methods used. In particular, the pN classification correlates with the number of nodes examined. The findings of micrometastases or isolated tumor cells in bone marrow should be indicated, and such cases must be analyzed separately from other metastatic cases. The same applies to patients with positive cytology in ascites fluid or peritoneal washings without gross involvement of the peritoneum. For the R classification the additional descriptors (conv), for conventional methods used, and (soph), for sophisticated, are recommended to indicate the methods used for classification. In general, long-term survival can be expected only after R0 resection (resection without residual tumor). The observed 5-year survival after R0 resection is 15% to 40% for esophageal carcinoma, 40% to 75% for gastric carcinoma, and 55% to 60% for colorectal carcinoma; the respective figures for R1 and R2 resections are only about 5% each. In R1 and R2 cases prognosis is determined primarily by the absence or presence of distant metastases, and pT and pN are of minor significance. After R0 resection there is a wide spectrum of prognoses. Careful pTNM classification allows a good estimation of the prognosis and can be considered the gold standard for any analysis of treatment results.World Journal of Surgery 19(2):184-90. · 2.36 Impact Factor -
Article: Tumour markers of prognosis in colorectal cancer.
British Journal of Cancer 02/1999; 79(2):191-203. · 5.04 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
117 colorectal tumor samples
2 patients
3 independent observers
4 colorectal cancer patients
aggressive tumor cells
Cell culture experiments
endothelial cells
form blood-conducting tubes
human colorectal carcinoma material
intermediate cancer stages
measure microvessel density
melanoma tumor cells
Paraffin-embedded tissue samples
proliferating endothelial cells
real-time PCR
strong independent prognostic marker
tumor cell plasticity
tumor stage
tumor types
Vasculogenic mimicry