Prognostic value of peritoneal cytology and the combination of peritoneal cytology and peritoneal dissemination in colorectal cancer.

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan 2 Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (Impact Factor: 3.34). 12/2009; 52(12):2016-21. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b4c46e
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The value of positive peritoneal cytology in colorectal cancer has been controversial. In this study, we aimed to clarify the prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology and the impact of the combination of peritoneal dissemination and peritoneal cytology on the prognostic evaluation of colorectal cancer.
From January 1997 to December 2005, intraoperative peritoneal cytology was performed on 410 patients who had at least serosal invasion.
Thirty-one patients (7.6%) had positive peritoneal cytology. Patients with negative cytology showed a significantly better survival rate at five years than those with positive cytology (negative cytology, 68.0%; positive cytology, 20.6%; P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that peritoneal cytology is one of the significant prognostic factors. Sixty percent of patients with positive cytology and 30.4% of patients with negative cytology recurred (P = 0.08). Regarding the recurrence site, patients with positive cytology showed a significantly higher recurrence rate of peritoneal dissemination than those with negative cytology (P = 0.0038). Some patients with positive cytology but without evident peritoneal dissemination achieved long-term survival. Additionally, some patients with macroscopic peritoneal dissemination and negative peritoneal cytology also achieved long-term survival. But for those patients with both positive cytology and evident macroscopic peritoneal dissemination, the five-year survival rate was zero.
Patients with negative peritoneal cytology had a significantly better five-year survival rate than those with positive peritoneal cytology. In some cases in which either peritoneal cytology or peritoneal dissemination was negative, long-term survival could be achieved.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Free intraperitoneal tumour cells are an independent indicator of poor prognosis, and are encorporated in current staging systems in upper gastrointestinal cancers, but not colorectal cancer. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the role and prognostic significance of positive peritoneal lavage in colorectal cancer. METHODS: A search was undertaken of PUBMED/Medline and Cochrane databases for English language articles from 1990 to 2012 using a predefined search strategy. Both detection of free tumour cells and/or detection of tumour-associated antigens in peritoneal lavage fluid were considered a positive lavage. Primary endpoints were rates of positive lavage, recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Of 3805 articles identified by title, 18 met inclusion criteria (n = 3197 patients, 59.5% colon, 40.5% rectal cancer). There was heterogeneity across studies in method of detection of peritoneal disease with 7 studies using more than one method (conventional cytology (14 studies), immunological techniques (6 studies), molecular techniques (4 studies)). The rate of positive lavage varied from 2.1% to 52% across studies, with a weighted mean rate of positive lavage of 13.17% overall (95% CI 12.74-13.59). In 10 studies (n = 2017) positive peritoneal lavage was associated with worse survival, and with increased recurrence in 12 (n = 2371). Clinicopathological factors frequently associated with positive lavage included macroscopic peritoneal disease, increasing tumour stage and nodal disease. CONCLUSION: Positive peritoneal lavage is a negative prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. However, its utility in staging colorectal cancer is currently limited by wide variation in rates of positive lavage between studies due to differences in methods of peritoneal lavage fluid analysis.
    Surgical Oncology 03/2013; · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal cancer cells are detectable at the time of colorectal cancer resection in some patients. The significance of this, particularly in patients with no other adverse prognostic features, is poorly defined. Consequently peritoneal lavage is not part of routine practice during colorectal cancer resection, in contrast with other abdominal malignancies. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effect of positive intraoperative peritoneal cytology on cancer-specific outcomes in colorectal cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of key electronic journal databases was undertaken using the search terms 'peritoneal cytology' and 'colorectal' from 1980 to 2012. Studies including patients with frank peritoneal metastasis were excluded. Meta-analysis for overall survival, local/peritoneal recurrence and overall recurrence was performed. RESULTS: Twelve cohort studies (2580 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The weighted mean yield was 11·6 (range 2·2-41) per cent. Yield rates were dependent on timing of sampling (before resection, 11·8 per cent; after resection, 13·2 per cent) and detection methods used (cytopathology, 8·4 per cent; immunocytochemistry, 28·3 per cent; polymerase chain reaction, 14·5 per cent). Meta-analysis showed that positive peritoneal lavage predicted worse overall survival (odds ratio (OR) 4·26, 95 per cent confidence interval 2·86 to 6·36; P < 0·001), local/peritoneal recurrence (OR 6·57, 2·30 to 18·79; P < 0·001) and overall recurrence (OR 4·02, 2·24 to 7·22; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Evidence of intraoperative peritoneal tumour cells at colorectal cancer resection is predictive of adverse cancer outcomes.
    British Journal of Surgery 03/2013; · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of peritoneal lavage cytology for patients with gastric cancer is recognized, whereas that for patients with colorectal cancer remains controversial. The present study used a nationwide registry to clarify the prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed factors associated with recurrence and survival in patients with T3-T4 colorectal cancer without distant metastasis taken from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum between 1984 and 1999. RESULTS: Among 34,554 patients in this study, not all of whom received peritoneal lavage cytology, 35 had positive peritoneal lavage cytology. Gender (P = 0.0004), tumor location (P < 0.0001), histological grade (P < 0.0001), depth of tumor invasion (P < 0.0001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.0001) and peritoneal cytology (P = 0.015) were risk factors for peritoneal recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor location (P < 0.0001), histological grade (P < 0.0001), depth of tumor invasion (P < 0.0001) and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.0001) were independent risk factors for peritoneal metastasis. Gender (P < 0.0001), tumor location (P < 0.0001), age (P < 0.0001), histological grade (P < 0.0001), depth of tumor invasion (P < 0.0001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.0001) and peritoneal cytology (P = 0.0004) were independent prognostic factors according to the Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSION: Positive peritoneal lavage cytology was associated with poorer survival in patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer. Positive cytology might be a good indicator of candidates for intensive adjuvant chemotherapy. The benefit of intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for such patients should be validated in prospective trials.
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology 02/2012; · 1.41 Impact Factor