Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease

Departments of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.3). 11/2009; 73(21):1738-45. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34b47
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Due to the high prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Parkinson disease (PD), routine cognitive screening is important for the optimal management of patients with PD. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is more sensitive than the commonly used Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in detecting MCI and dementia in patients without PD, but its validity in PD has not been established.
A representative sample of 132 patients with PD at 2 movement disorders centers was administered the MoCA, MMSE, and a neuropsychological battery with operationalized criteria for deficits. MCI and PD dementia (PDD) criteria were applied by an investigator blinded to the MoCA and MMSE results. The discriminant validity of the MoCA and MMSE as screening and diagnostic instruments was ascertained.
Approximately one third of the sample met diagnostic criteria for a cognitive disorder (12.9% PDD and 17.4% MCI). Mean (SD) MoCA and MMSE scores were 25.0 (3.8) and 28.1 (2.0). The overall discriminant validity for detection of any cognitive disorder was similar for the MoCA and the MMSE (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [95% confidence interval]): MoCA (0.79 [0.72, 0.87]) and MMSE (0.76 [0.67, 0.85]), but as a screening instrument the MoCA (optimal cutoff point = 26/27, 64% correctly diagnosed, lack of ceiling effect) was superior to the MMSE (optimal cutoff point = 29/30, 54% correctly diagnosed, presence of ceiling effect).
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, but not the Mini-Mental State Examination, has adequate psychometric properties as a screening instrument for the detection of mild cognitive impairment or dementia in Parkinson disease. However, a positive screen using either instrument requires additional assessment due to suboptimal specificity at the recommended screening cutoff point.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this experiment, 97 patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome were divided into three groups (mild, moderate, severe) according to minimum oxygen saturation, and 35 healthy subjects were examined as controls. Cognitive function was determined using the mismatch negativity paradigm and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The results revealed that as the disease worsened, the mismatch negativity latency was gradually extended, and the amplitude gradually declined in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome. Importantly, mismatch negativity latency in severe patients with a persistent time of minimum oxygen saturation < 60 seconds was significantly shorter than that with a persistent time of minimum oxygen saturation > 60 seconds. Correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation between minimum oxygen saturation latency and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. These findings indicate that intermittent night-time hypoxemia affects mismatch negativity waveforms and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. As indicators for detecting the cognitive functional status of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome patients, the sensitivity of mismatch negativity is 82.93%, the specificity is 73.33%, the accuracy rate is 81.52%, the positive predictive value is 85.00%, the negative predictive value is 70.21%, the positive likelihood ratio is 3, and the negative likelihood ratio is 0.23. These results indicate that mismatch negativity can be used as an effective tool for diagnosis of cognitive dysfunction in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome patients.
    Neural Regeneration Research 07/2012; 7(20):1591-8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.20.010 · 0.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Psychiatrie 01/2014; 18(2):106-8.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESUMO: Os défices posturais e de equilíbrio são dos aspetos mais incapacitantes presentes na Doença de Parkinson (DP), levando à diminuição da mobilidade e da autonomia funcional. O objetivo deste estudo é comparar o controlo postural dos indivíduos com e sem DP no sit-to-stand-to-sit, em particular nas fases de preparação para o levantar (fase 1) e para o sentar (fase 4), em situações de realização de tarefa única e dupla-tarefa. A amostra foi constituída por 9 indivíduos com DP e 9 controlos saudáveis. Uma plataforma de forças foi utilizada para avaliar o deslocamento e a velocidade de deslocamento do centro de pressão (CP) nos eixos antero-posterior e médio-lateral. Os resultados foram analisados estatisticamente a partir do software SPSS. Verificaram-se diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre o grupo controlo e com DP na fase 4, em tarefa única e dupla, na duração da fase e na velocidade de deslocamento antero-posterior do CoP (p<0,05) e apenas em tarefa dupla, no deslocamento antero-posterior do CP (p=0,007). Isto demonstra comprometimento dos ajustes posturais necessários aquando o sentar, existindo mais dificuldade quando se adiciona uma tarefa cognitiva.
    6th Portuguese Congress on Biomechanics (CNB2015), Leiria, Portugal; 02/2015

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 16, 2014