Effect of Intradialytic Versus Home-Based Aerobic Exercise Training on Physical Function and Vascular Parameters in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Pilot Study

School of Human Life Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250 Australia.
American Journal of Kidney Diseases (Impact Factor: 5.76). 11/2009; 55(1):88-99. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.025
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hemodialysis patients show reduced physical function and greater risk of increased arterial stiffness because of hypertension, metabolic disturbances, and vascular calcification. Exercise interventions potentially could improve their vascular risk profile.
Randomized controlled pilot clinical study comparing the effects of 6 months of supervised intradialytic exercise training versus home-based exercise training or usual care on physical function and arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients.
70 hemodialysis patients from 3 renal units.
Intradialytic-exercise patients trained 3 times/wk for 6 months on a cycle ergometer and home-based-exercise patients followed a walking program to achieve the same weekly physical activity. Usual-care patients received no specific intervention.
Primary outcome measures were distance traveled during a 6-minute walk test and aortic pulse wave velocity. Secondary outcome measures included augmentation index (augmentation pressure as a percentage of central pulse pressure), peripheral (brachial) and central blood pressures (measured noninvasively using radial tonometry), physical activity, and self-reported physical functioning. Measurements were made at baseline and 6 months.
At 6 months, there were no significant differences between changes in 6-minute walk test distance (intradialytic exercise, +14%; home-based exercise, +11%; usual care, +5%), pulse wave velocity (intradialytic exercise, -4%; home-based exercise, -2%; usual care, +5%), or any secondary outcome measure.
Lack of medication data limited the analysis of vascular parameters in this study.
There were no differences between intradialytic or home-based exercise training and usual care for either physical function or vascular parameters.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Whilst aerobic training may decrease arterial stiffness, trials assessing the effect of combined aerobic and resistance training on arterial stiffness are not conclusive.•We quantified the effect of combined training on arterial stiffness from 11 RCTs, as determined by PWV, and compare it with aerobic training.•Pooled evidence suggests that combined aerobic and resistance training is not as effective as aerobic training alone to reduce arterial stiffness.
    International Journal of Cardiology 01/2015; 178. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.147 · 6.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and Objective: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are more inactive, leading to poor functional capacity and quality of life; this may be reversed with intradialytic exercise training. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of intradialytic exercise for HD patients, we conducted a meta-analysis of the published randomized controlled trials. Data Sources and Methods: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched up to February, 2014. The reference lists of eligible studies and relevant reviews were also checked. Results: 24 studies of 997 patients were included. Compared with control, intradialytic exercise significantly improve Kt/V (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI 0.01-0.53), peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.76), and physical performance of physical function of life (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI 0.04-0.55). However, no significant improvements were found in the mental function of life. There was no significant difference with respect to musculoskeletal and cardiovascular complications between the intradialytic exercise groups and control groups. Further subgroup analysis found that, when the trial duration was more than 6 months, the intervention had significant effects on VO2peak (SMD = 0.89, 95% CI 0.56-1.22). However, when the trial duration was less than 6 months, the change of VO2peak was not significant (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.51). Conclusion: Intradialytic exercise can improve Kt/V, VO2peak, and the physical quality of life, and intradialytic exercise is safe for HD patients. Therefore, we put forward the suggestion that clinical guideline be updated to inform clinicians on the benefits of intradialytic exercise on HD patients. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    American Journal of Nephrology 12/2014; 40(5):478-490. DOI:10.1159/000368722 · 2.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the general population, moderate exercise is associated with several health benefits including a decreased risk of obesity, coronary heart disease, stroke, certain types of cancer and all-cause mortality. In chronic kidney disease (CKD), physical inability is an independent risk of death. Health benefits of regular exercise in CKD patients include improvements in functional and psychological measures such as aerobic and walking capacity and health-related quality of life. Nonetheless, in CKD patients exercise rehabilitation is not routinely prescribed. Renal patients are heterogeneous across the different stages of CKD so that the assessment of physical capability is mandatory for a correct exercise program prescription. To plan appropriate exercise programs in the CKD setting, targeted professional figures should be actively involved as many psychological or logistic barriers may hamper exercise implementation in these subjects. Different approaches, such as home exercise rehabilitation programs, supervised exercise training or in-hospital gym may theoretically be proposed. However, physical exercise should always be tailored to the individual capacity and comorbidities and each patient should ideally be involved in the decision-making process.
    Journal of nephrology 02/2015; DOI:10.1007/s40620-014-0169-6 · 2.00 Impact Factor