Perceptions of Second-hand Smoke Risks Predict Future Adolescent Smoking Initiation

University of California, Merced, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, Psychological Sciences, Merced, California 95343, USA.
Journal of Adolescent Health (Impact Factor: 3.61). 12/2009; 45(6):618-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.022
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To directly test whether perceptions of second-hand smoke risks deter adolescent smoking initiation.
A longitudinal survey design was utilized in this study. Baseline surveys measuring perceptions of tobacco-related risks and smoking behaviors were administered to 395 high school students, with three follow-up assessments every 6 months.
Perceptions of personal second-hand smoke risks and parental second-hand smoke risks significantly deterred adolescent smoking initiation. Perceptions of personal second-hand smoke risks reduced the odds of smoking by a factor of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.42-0.94) for each quartile increase in perceptions of personal second-hand smoke risks. Adolescents who provided the highest estimates of risks for personal second-hand smoke were 0.25 as likely to smoke as adolescents who provided the lowest estimates of risk. Perceptions of parental second-hand smoke risks reduced the odds of smoking by a factor of 0.64 (95% CI=0.43-0.93) for each quartile increase. Adolescents who perceived the highest estimates of risks associated with parental second-hand smoke were 0.26 as likely to smoke in the future compared to adolescents who provided the lowest estimates of risk. These effects are over three times as large as a smoking peer's influence on a nonsmoking adolescents' risk for smoking initiation, odds ratio [OR]=1.18 (95% CI=1.02-1.35).
Adolescent perceptions of risks of second-hand smoke are strongly associated with smoking initiation. Encouraging adolescents to express their objections to second-hand smoke, as well as encouraging parents to create smoke-free homes, may be powerful tobacco control strategies against adolescent smoking.

Download full-text


Available from: Stanton Glantz, Dec 15, 2014
36 Reads
  • Source
    • "Such changes can lead to increases in the adoption of, and compliance with, smoke-free environments as people become more conscious of the public health benefits of smoke-free air [3]. Parental attitudes and awareness toward SHS and its risks are associated with SHS exposure among youth [4], and greater perceptions of risk from SHS exposure among youth can reduce their likelihood of smoking initiation [5]. Although previous research suggests that a vast majority (95%) of U.S. adults recognize the hazards of youth exposure to SHS [6], no study has examined perceptions about the harm of SHS exposure among a representative sample of U.S. youth. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increased knowledge of the harmful effects of SHS is an evidence-based key indicator for eliminating nonsmokers¿ exposure to SHS. This study assessed the prevalence and predictors of perceptions about the harm of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among U.S. middle and high school students. Data were obtained from the 2012 National Youth Tobacco Survey, a nationally representative school-based survey of U.S. students in grades 6¿12. Respondents who reported that they thought breathing smoke from other people¿s cigarettes or other tobacco products causes ¿some¿ or ¿a lot¿ of harm were considered to have the perception that SHS is harmful. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of the perception that SHS is harmful. Predictors included sex, race/ethnicity, school grade level, current tobacco use, and whether the respondent currently lived with a tobacco user. Overall, 75.4% of students perceived SHS exposure as harmful. The adjusted odds of perceiving SHS exposure as harmful were higher among non-Hispanic Asians than among non-Hispanic whites, and among students in 10th-12th grades than among students in 8th grade. Adjusted odds were lower among boys than among girls, among non-Hispanic blacks than among non-Hispanic whites, among students living with a tobacco user than among those not, and among those who use combustible tobacco only or both combustible and non-combustible tobacco than among those who use no tobacco. Most middle and high school students perceive SHS exposure as harmful, but efforts are needed to increase the prevalence of this perception in certain subpopulations, particularly tobacco users.
    Tobacco Induced Diseases 07/2013; 11(1):16. DOI:10.1186/1617-9625-11-16 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Public health programs and policies that help to empower youth who live in families in which parents and other family members smoke are needed. Song et al. recommend that encouraging youth to express their objections to second-hand smoke, as well as encouraging smoke-free homes, may be powerful tobacco control strategies against youth smoking [47]. In addition to controlling smoking within households, the findings from this study may be used to move forward tobacco control programs and policies designed to prevent parents and other adults from smoking around youth in locations outside the home where parents and youth interact. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Successful cancer prevention policies and programming for youth must be based on a solid understanding of youth’s conceptualization of cancer and cancer prevention. Accordingly, a qualitative study examining youth’s perspectives of cancer and its prevention was undertaken. Not surprisingly, smoking (i.e., tobacco cigarette smoking) was one of the dominant lines of discourse in the youth’s narratives. This paper reports findings of how youth conceptualize smoking with attention to their perspectives on parental and family-related smoking issues and experiences. Methods Seventy-five Canadian youth ranging in age from 11–19 years participated in the study. Six of the 75 youth had a history of smoking and 29 had parents with a history of smoking. Youth were involved in traditional ethnographic methods of interviewing and photovoice. Data analysis involved multiple levels of analysis congruent with ethnography. Results Youth’s perspectives of parents and other family members’ cigarette smoking around them was salient as represented by the theme: It’s not fair. Youth struggled to make sense of why parents would smoke around their children and perceived their smoking as an unjust act. The theme was supported by four subthemes: 1) parenting the parent about the dangers of smoking; 2) the good/bad parent; 3) distancing family relationships; and 4) the prisoner. Instead of being talked to about smoking it was more common for youth to share stories of talking to their parents about the dangers of smoking. Parents who did not smoke were seen by youth as the good parent, as opposed to the bad parent who smoked. Smoking was an agent that altered relationships with parents and other family members. Youth who lived in homes where they were exposed to cigarette smoke felt like a trapped prisoner. Conclusions Further research is needed to investigate youth’s perceptions about parental cigarette smoking as well as possible linkages between youth exposed to second hand smoke in their home environment and emotional and lifestyle-related health difficulties. Results emphasize the relational impact of smoking when developing anti-tobacco and cancer prevention campaigns. Recognizing the potential toll that second-hand smoke can have on youth’s emotional well-being, health care professionals are encouraged to give youth positive messages in coping with their parents’ smoking behaviour.
    BMC Public Health 11/2012; 12(1):965. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-965 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Finally, much of the improvement in predicting adolescents' decision making has derived from an expanded consideration of the subjective benefits that adolescents associate with health-risk behaviors. For instance, one study found that adolescents' perceptions of the benefits (e.g., social status, pleasure) of alcohol and tobacco use prospectively predicts their decisions to drink and smoke 6 months later, above and beyond age, experience with the substance , and perceptions of risk (Goldberg et al., 2002; see also Halpern-Felsher, Biehl, Kropp, & Rubinstein, 2004; Meier, Slutke, Arndt, & Cadoret, 2007; Song, Morrell, et al., 2009). A recent meta-analysis of studies predicting sexual activity, alcohol and tobacco use, and nutrition behavior in adolescents ages 10 – 18 found that perceptions of benefits are stronger predictors than risk perceptions of all four behaviors (Peters et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article, we review the most important findings to have emerged during the past 10 years in the study of judgment and decision making (JDM) in adolescence and look ahead to possible new directions in this burgeoning area of research. Three inter-related shifts in research emphasis are of particular importance and serve to organize this review. First, research grounded in normative models of JDM has moved beyond the study of age differences in risk perception and toward a dynamic account of the factors predicting adolescent decisions. Second, the field has seen widespread adoption of dual-process models of cognitive development that describe 2 relatively independent modes of information processing, typically contrasting an analytic (cold) system with an experiential (hot) one. Finally, there has been an increase in attention to the social, emotional, and self-regulatory factors that influence JDM. This shift in focus reflects the growing influence of findings from developmental neuroscience, which describe a pattern of structural and functional maturation that may set the stage for a heightened propensity to make risky decisions in adolescence.
    Journal of Research on Adolescence 02/2011; 21(1):211 - 224. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00724.x · 1.99 Impact Factor
Show more