A qualidade de vida dos sobreviventes de cancro
Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública 01/2006; 24:37-56.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: IntroductionThe aim of the present study was the comparison of emotional adjustment and quality of life (QoL) of bone and soft tissue cancer patients that were in different phases of the disease trajectory.Material and methodsFifty five patients between diagnosis and treatment initiation, 55 under treatment and 74 in follow-up consultations were assessed using self-report questionnaires. Seventy persons from the general population were used as control group. In the different phases of the disease the majority of patients revealed normal or mild levels of anxiety and depression but, an important minority showed moderate to severe levels.ResultsIn general, the emotional distress of patients in each phase of the disease was not clinically relevant and was comparable to that of healthy individuals. Only patients under treatment exhibited significant higher levels of depression compared to survivors in the follow-up phase. In diagnostic and treatment phase patients reported a poorer perception of overall and physical QoL compared to survivors and healthy controls. The impact on QoL, in general, seems more marked in the treatment phase given the worse levels of functioning in several domains of life, and the higher experience of physical symptoms, mainly compared with the follow-up phase. Free-disease survivors showed a QoL comparable to that of healthy individuals, in its different dimensions.Conclusions The number of patients with significant levels of emotional distress (between 25% and 29.6% for anxiety, and 8.3% and 23.6% for depression), and the impact of bone and soft tissue cancer on QoL, mainly in diagnostic phase and during treatments, call to the need of implementing multidisciplinary interventions in patients with this specific cancer diagnose. These interventions should include a psychosocial component and be adapted to each phase of the disease trajectory.01/2011; 29(1):35–46. DOI:10.1016/S0870-9025(11)70006-2
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.