Article

Fuerza lumbar en jugadores de hockey hierba

Apunts: Medicina de l'esport; Vol.: 42 Núm.: 155 DOI: 10.1016/S1886-6581(07)70050-6
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Introducción: El dolor lumbar tiene una alta prevalencia entre los deportistas, se ha relacionado con déficits en la fuerza extensora lumbar, y el hecho de padecerlo representa un obstáculo importante para la práctica de deportes de alta intensidad. Método: Se ha medido la fuerza lumbar en 2 grupos de practicantes de hockey hierba mediante máquina MedX® y un test de resistencia isométrico lumbar. Resultados: Entre ambos grupos los resultados han sido muy homogéneos. Los 2 tests no presentan relación entre sí ni con las características biomédicas de los jugadores (edad, índice de masa corporal o VO2máx). Los niveles de fuerza máxima y resistencia isométrica obtenidos han sido superiores a los de referencia entre sedentarios. Característicamente, entre los jugadores de hockey hierba la relación entre la fuerza extensora del tronco en flexión (M) respecto a la fuerza extensora del tronco en extensión (m) es mayor que en otros deportistas (ratio M/m > 1,6, mientras que en la población normal es 1,4) debido probablemente a la postura en semiflexión propia del hockey. Conclusión: Los resultados de los test de fuerza extensora lumbar tienen unas características propias entre los jugadores de hockey hierba.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
137 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A prospective evaluation of the incidence of low back pain in college athletes was undertaken. To evaluate prospectively leg length discrepancy, hip flexor tightness, and lower extremity acquired laxity or overuse as predictive factors for low back pain in college athletes. A pilot study found an association between low back pain and the factors to be studied. Several allusions to the kinetic chain theory appear in the literature, but little prospective research has been done in examining the effects of lower extremity involvement on the back. Two-hundred fifty-seven college athletes representing nine varsity sports were screened during a preseason sports physical examination. Measures of flexibility, ligamentous stability, leg length discrepancy, and overuse syndromes were recorded. Athletes were observed throughout the ensuing year for low back pain requiring treatment by the athletic trainer. Those athletes with low back pain as the result of direct trauma to the region were excluded from the data. Twenty-four athletes (9.3%) received treatment for low back pain. Thirteen of 87 women (15%) compared with 11 of 170 men (6%) required treatment for low back pain (P = 0.048). Of 57 athletes with lower extremity acquired laxity or overuse, low back pain developed in 14 (P < 0.001). Athletes with lower extremity acquired ligamentous laxity or overuse may be at risk for the development of noncontact low back pain during athletic competition. Female athletes with lower extremity involvement appeared to have a higher incidence of low back pain treatment compared with their male counterparts. Inflexibility of the lower extremities or leg length discrepancy were not associated with future low back pain treatment.
    Spine 05/1998; 23(7):828-33. · 2.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) remains one of the most difficult and costly medical problems in the industrialized world. A review of nineteenth and early twentieth century spine rehabilitation shows that back disorders were commonly treated with aggressive and specific progressive resistance exercise (PRE). Despite a lack of scientific evidence to support their efficacy, therapeutic approaches to back rehabilitation over the past 30 yr have focused primarily upon passive care for symptom relief. Recent spine rehabilitation programs have returned to active reconditioning PRE centered around low back strengthening to restore normal musculoskeletal function. Research has shown that lumbar extension exercise using PRE significantly increases strength and decreases pain in CLBP patients. It appears that isolated lumbar extension exercise with the pelvis stabilized using specialized equipment elicits the most favorable improvements in low back strength, muscle cross-sectional area, and vertebral bone mineral density (BMD). These improvements occur with a low training volume of 1 set of 8 to 15 repetitions performed to volitional fatigue one time per week. CLBP patients participating in isolated lumbar extension PRE programs demonstrate significant reductions in pain and symptoms associated with improved muscle strength, endurance, and joint mobility. Improvements occur independent of diagnosis, are long-lasting, and appear to result in less re-utilization of the health care system than other more passive treatments. Low back strengthening shows promise for the reduction of industrial back injuries and associated costs.
    Medicine &amp Science in Sports &amp Exercise 02/1999; 31(1):18-24. · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This cohort study examined a sample (n = 152) of subjects tested for isokinetic lumbar strength and endurance, using novel endurance measures. To validate a new lumbar sagittal isokinetic endurance testing protocol comparing reliability in a normal subject cohort with strength test reliability to include presentation of a gender-specific normative database, and then correlating the results to a Sorenson isometric endurance protocol. The isometric Sorenson test has been virtually the only validated clinical tool for lumbar extensor trunk muscle endurance testing, using an exercise chair and permitting the subject to maintain the trunk horizontal against gravity for a single timed contraction. Alternative isokinetic sagittal lumbar performance measurement methodology has been developed recently to measure trunk muscle endurance by determining declining work performance on repeated, reciprocal dynamic contractions. We compared protocols, performance measures, normative data, and reliability for the static isometric Sorenson test to three different isokinetic endurance measurements: the endurance ratio, final fatigue ratio, and recovery ratio. Subjects were tested on a sagittal Cybex TEF (Lumex, Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY) unit for a strength trial followed by an endurance trial. Subgroups also performed reliability and isometric endurance protocols. We found an extremely low test-retest correlation for the isometric Sorenson trunk extension test. All test-retest correlations for the corresponding isokinetic endurance measures were significant and markedly higher. Extensor muscle performance declined more substantially on all endurance measures than flexors and showed more variability. In contrast, trunk strength measures were more reliable and less variable than corresponding endurance measures. Moreover, correlations between the isometric Sorenson test and the isokinetic endurance measures were all negative; i.e., increases in Sorenson time are moderately correlated to greater decline in work performance. Reliability of the Sorenson isometric endurance test is unacceptably low, showing negative correlations to all isokinetic endurance tests for lumbar extensors. Isokinetic strength and endurance tests are far more reliable than isometric tests, with normative data showing more consistent results from men than women. Both genders display more substantial fatigue (and greater variability) in extensor endurance compared with flexor testing. Endurance measures are identified as human performance cognitive constructs, and reasons for greater variability than usually shown by trunk strength measurements are discussed.
    Spine 05/1995; 20(8):920-6; discussion 926-7. · 2.16 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
76 Downloads
Available from
May 29, 2014