Métodos de lectura y acceso al léxico

Source: OAI


Demuestra la influencia de los métodos de lectura en las estrategias de acceso al léxico en alumnos del primer ciclo de primaria que aprenden a leer con diferente método (fonético vs. global-natural) en una ortografía transparente. Se llevan a cabo cuatro estudios experimentales: El primero, un estudio normativo, tiene la finalidad de obtener una muestra de estímulos (palabras) que se va a utilizar en el resto de tareas experimentales, así como calcular la familiaridad subjetiva de las palabras que se van a emplear. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 207 sujetos, perteneciendo 95 al método global-natural y 112 al método fonético. A esta muestra se le administraron tres tareas experimentales: tarea de decisión léxica, nombrar (naming) y análisis de errores en la lectura oral. En las tres tareas se utilizaron estímulos palabras y pseudopalabras y se empleó un diseño factorial de medidas repetidas, utilizando como vbs intersujetos: nivel escolar y método de lectura y como vbs intrasujetos la longitud, familiaridad subjetiva (palabras) y la FSP.

Download full-text


Available from: Remedios Guzmán, Sep 29, 2015
1 Follower
43 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Examined the evidence for the independence of phonological skills and general cognitive processes to test K. E. Stanovich's (see record 1989-16003-001) proposal that a deficit in phonological processing is the core deficit of reading disability. A sample of 1,493 children (aged 7–16 yrs), including both reading disabled and normally achieving Ss, was administered a variety of phonological processing, word recognition, spelling, and reading comprehension measures. Pseudoword reading skill was the most significant correlate of word recognition and reading comprehension scores; IQ contributed little independent variance. Phonological processing deficits appear to be the fundamental problem of reading disabled Ss. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
    Developmental Review 08/1993; 13(3):246-257. DOI:10.1006/drev.1993.1011 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Developed an activation–verification model for letter and word recognition that yields predictions of 2-alternative forced-choice performance for 864 individual stimuli that are either words, orthographically regular nonwords, or orthographically irregular nonwords. The model explains why letters embedded in words are recognized more accurately than letters embedded in nonwords. The encoding algorithm uses empirically determined confusion matrices to activate units in both an alphabetum and a lexicon. Predicted performance is enhanced when decisions are based on lexical information, because activity in the lexicon tends to constrain the identity of test letters more than the activity in the alphabetum. Thus, the model predicts large advantages of words over irregular nonwords, and smaller advantages of words over regular nonwords. The predicted differences demonstrate that the effects of manipulating lexicality and orthography can be predicted on the basis of lexical constraint alone. Within each class (word, regular nonword, irregular nonword) there are significant correlations between the simulated and obtained responses on individual items. This model is contrasted with the interactive activation model of J. L. McClelland et al . (29 ref)
    Psychological Review 10/1982; 89(5):573-94. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.89.5.573 · 7.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adult subjects decided whether strings of four, five, or six letters formed words or nonwords. Words and nonwords were equally probable stimuli, and there were equal numbers of stimuli of high and low mean bigram frequency. Half the words were common and half occurred rarely i[~ printed English. Mean bigram frequency had no effect on subjects' response times for common words and for nonwords, but the reaction times for rare words were significantly longer for words of high mean bigram frequency than for words of low mean bigram frequency. This result may be accounted for by a modification of Rumelhart and Siple's (1974) model of word perception to include the mapping of simple features to units which correspond to common spelling patterns.
    Memory & Cognition 09/1975; 3(5):513-8. DOI:10.3758/BF03197523 · 1.92 Impact Factor
Show more