Randomized Clinical Trials in Rectal and Anal Cancers
Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
(Impact Factor: 1.81).
01/2010; 19(1):205-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2009.09.005
This article reviews randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between April 2001 and November 2008 on the management of patients with rectal cancer. In total, the authors reviewed 78 RCTs on therapy for rectal cancer. Of these, five met the authors' criteria for level 1a evidence. The article discusses the major RCTs and relevant findings that have impacted clinical management most and includes most but not all RCTs on therapy for rectal cancer published during this period.
Available from: PubMed Central
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Elevated microsatellite instability at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST) is a genetic signature identified in 60% of sporadic colon cancers and may be linked with heterogeneous expression of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein hMSH3. Unlike microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) in which hypermethylation of hMLH1 occurs followed by multiple susceptible gene mutations, EMAST may be associated with inflammation and subsequent relaxation of MMR function with the biological consequences not known. We evaluated the prevalence of EMAST and MSI in a population-based cohort of rectal cancers, as EMAST has not been previously determined in rectal cancers.
We analyzed 147 sporadic cases of rectal cancer using five tetranucleotide microsatellite markers and National-Cancer-Institute-recommended MSI (mononucleotide and dinucleotide) markers. EMAST and MSI determinations were made on analysis of DNA sequences of the polymerase chain reaction products and determined positive if at least two loci were found to have frame-shifted repeats upon comparison between normal and cancer samples from the same patient. We correlated EMAST data with race, gender, and tumor stage and examined the samples for lymphocyte infiltration.
Among this cohort of patients with rectal cancer (mean age 62.2 ± 10.3 years, 36% female, 24% African American), 3/147 (2%) showed MSI (three males, two African American) and 49/147 (33%) demonstrated EMAST. Rectal tumors from African Americans were more likely to show EMAST than Caucasians (18/37, 49% vs. 27/104, 26%, p = 0.014) and were associated with advanced stage (18/29, 62% EMAST vs. 18/53, 37%, non-EMAST p = 0.02). There was no association between EMAST and gender. EMAST was more prevalent in rectal tumors that showed peri-tumoral infiltration compared to those without (30/49, 60% EMAST vs. 24/98, 25% non-EMAST, p = 0.0001).
EMAST in rectal cancer is common and MSI is rare. EMAST is associated with African-American race and may be more commonly seen with metastatic disease. The etiology and consequences of EMAST are under investigation, but its association with immune cell infiltration suggests that inflammation may play a role for its development.
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2010; 14(10):1521-8. DOI:10.1007/s11605-010-1340-6 · 2.80 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The management of locally advanced (T3/4) rectal cancer is evolving. Randomized trials have shaped the current adjuvant treatment options, but yet there remain many unanswered questions. These include how best to define which patients to treat and choosing between short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy. With respect to surgery, the optimal timing, the surgical approach in abdominoperineal resections and the role of laparoscopic surgery remain active areas of research. The possibility of avoiding surgery in selected patients is also a topic of great interest. A multidisciplinary team approach in managing rectal cancer patients is popular where possible and recommended in some guidelines.
ANZ Journal of Surgery 11/2011; 81(11):790-6. DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05704.x · 1.12 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.