Interaction between nitric oxide synthase inhibitor induced oscillations and the activation flow coupling response

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Brain research (Impact Factor: 2.83). 11/2009; 1309:19-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.119
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The role of nitric oxide (NO) in the activation-flow coupling (AFC) response to periodic electrical forepaw stimulation was investigated using signal averaged laser Doppler (LD) flowmetry. LD measures of calculated cerebral blood flow (CBF) were obtained both prior and after intra-peritoneal administration of the non-selective nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) (40 mg/kg). Characteristic baseline low frequency vasomotion oscillations (0.17 Hz) were observed after L-NNA administration. These LD(CBF) oscillations were synchronous within but not between hemispheres. L-NNA reduced the magnitude of the AFC response (p<0.05) for longer stimuli (1 min) with longer inter-stimulus intervals (2 min). In contrast, the magnitude of the AFC response for short duration stimuli (4 s) with short inter-stimulus intervals (20 s) was augmented (p<0.05) after L-NNA. An interaction occurred between L-NNA induced vasomotion oscillations and the AFC response with the greatest increase occurring at the stimulus harmonic closest to the oscillatory frequency. Nitric oxide may therefore modulate the effects of other vasodilators involved in vasomotion oscillations and the AFC response.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This minireview discusses vasomotion, which is the oscillation in tone of blood vessels leading to flowmotion. We will briefly discuss the prevalence of vasomotion and its potential physiological and pathophysiological relevance. We will also discuss the models that have been suggested to explain how a coordinated oscillatory activity of the smooth muscle tone can occur and emphasize the role of the endothelium, the handling of intracellular Ca(2+) and the role of smooth muscle cell ion conductances. It is concluded that vasomotion is likely to enhance tissue dialysis, although this concept still requires more experimental verification, and that an understanding at the molecular level for the pathways leading to vasomotion is beginning to emerge.
    Acta Physiologica 07/2011; 202(3):253-69. DOI:10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02320.x · 4.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An almost sinusoidal, large amplitude ~0.1 Hz oscillation in cortical hemodynamics has been repeatedly observed in species ranging from mice to humans. However, the occurrence of 'slow sinusoidal hemodynamic oscillations' (SSHOs) in human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies is rarely noted or considered. As a result, little investigation into the cause of SSHOs has been undertaken, and their potential to confound fMRI analysis, as well as their possible value as a functional biomarker has been largely overlooked. Here, we report direct observation of large-amplitude, sinusoidal ~0.1 Hz hemodynamic oscillations in the cortex of an awake human undergoing surgical resection of a brain tumor. Intraoperative multispectral optical intrinsic signal imaging (MS-OISI) revealed that SSHOs were spatially localized to distinct regions of the cortex, exhibited wave-like propagation, and involved oscillations in the diameter of specific pial arterioles, confirming that the effect was not the result of systemic blood pressure oscillations. fMRI data collected from the same subject 4 days prior to surgery demonstrates that ~0.1 Hz oscillations in the BOLD signal can be detected around the same region. Intraoperative optical imaging data from a patient undergoing epilepsy surgery, in whom sinusoidal oscillations were not observed, is shown for comparison. This direct observation of the '0.1 Hz wave' in the awake human brain, using both intraoperative imaging and pre-operative fMRI, confirms that SSHOs occur in the human brain, and can be detected by fMRI. We discuss the possible physiological basis of this oscillation and its potential link to brain pathologies, highlighting its relevance to resting-state fMRI and its potential as a novel target for functional diagnosis and delineation of neurological disease.
    NeuroImage 10/2013; 87. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.044 · 6.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We used a combined electrophysiological/hemodynamic system to examine low-frequency oscillations (LFOs) in spontaneous neuronal activities (spike trains and local field potentials) and hemodynamic signals (cerebral blood flow) recorded from the anesthetized rat somatosensory and visual cortex. The laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) probe was tilted slightly to approach the area in which a microelectrode array (MEA) was implanted for simultaneous recordings. Spike trains (STs) were converted into continuous-time rate functions (CRFs) using the ST instantaneous firing rates. LFOs were detected for all three of the components using the multi-taper method (MTM). The frequencies of these LFOs ranged from 0.052 to 0.167Hz (mean±SD, 0.10±0.026Hz) for cerebral blood flow (CBF), from 0.027 to 0.26Hz (mean±SD, 0.12±0.041Hz) for the CRFs of the STs and from 0.04 to 0.19Hz (mean±SD, 0.11±0.035Hz) for local field potentials (LFPs). We evaluated the Granger causal relationships of spontaneous LFOs among CBF, LFPs and CRFs using Granger causality (GC) analysis. Significant Granger causal relationships were observed from LFPs to CBF, from STs to CBF and from LFPs to STs at approximately 0.1Hz. The present results indicate that spontaneous LFOs exist not only in hemodynamic components but also in neuronal activities of the rat cortex. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to identify Granger causal influences among CBF, LFPs and STs and show that spontaneous LFOs carry important Granger causal influences from neural activities to hemodynamic signals.
    NeuroImage 08/2013; 85. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.061 · 6.13 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 17, 2014