Article

Deterministic and Stochastic Models of Genetic Regulatory Networks

Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Methods in enzymology (Impact Factor: 2.19). 01/2009; 467:335-56. DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)67013-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Traditionally molecular biology research has tended to reduce biological pathways to composite units studied as isolated parts of the cellular system. With the advent of high throughput methodologies that can capture thousands of data points, and powerful computational approaches, the reality of studying cellular processes at a systems level is upon us. As these approaches yield massive datasets, systems level analyses have drawn upon other fields such as engineering and mathematics, adapting computational and statistical approaches to decipher relationships between molecules. Guided by high quality datasets and analyses, one can begin the process of predictive modeling. The findings from such approaches are often surprising and beyond normal intuition. We discuss four classes of dynamical systems used to model genetic regulatory networks. The discussion is divided into continuous and discrete models, as well as deterministic and stochastic model classes. For each combination of these categories, a model is presented and discussed in the context of the yeast cell cycle, illustrating how different types of questions can be addressed by different model classes.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John D Aitchison, Sep 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
89 Views
 · 
127 Downloads
  • Source
    • "Functional modules embedded within protein–DNA interactions, and protein–protein, and metabolite–substrate networks execute diverse cellular functions (Figure 1B; Mitra et al., 2013). The dichotomous (deterministic or stochastic) nature of network modules is beneficial to cells or organisms for adaptation to physiological perturbations, environmental cues, or pathological signals (Shmulevich and Aitchison, 2009). On the contrary, pathogens have evolved a suite of virulence proteins (effector molecules) that perturb the intracellular networks of their hosts to cause infection (Mukhtar, 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A systems perspective on diverse phenotypes, mechanisms of infection, and responses to environmental stresses can lead to considerable advances in agriculture and medicine. A significant promise of systems biology within plants is the development of disease-resistant crop varieties, which would maximize yield output for food, clothing, building materials, and biofuel production. A systems or “-omics” perspective frames the next frontier in the search for enhanced knowledge of plant network biology. The functional understanding of network structure and dynamics is vital to expanding our knowledge of how the intercellular communication processes are executed. This review article will systematically discuss various levels of organization of systems biology beginning with the building blocks termed “-omes” and ending with complex transcriptional and protein–protein interaction networks. We will also highlight the prevailing computational modeling approaches of biological regulatory network dynamics. The latest developments in the “-omics” approach will be reviewed and discussed to underline and highlight novel technologies and research directions in plant network biology.
    Frontiers in Plant Science 06/2014; DOI:10.3389/fpls.2014.00312 · 3.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Stochastic modeling has been used to simulate genetic and biochemical networks such as transcription, gene expression, and autoregulation of genetic pathways in order to study the different elements of the model and interactions between them. In addition to design and analysis of complex biological experiments (Shmulevich & Aitchison, 2009; Barnat et al., 2009; Cinquemani et al., 2008; Scott et al., 2007; Mazur et al., 2009), stochastic models are also necessary for understanding cell fate decision making where the observational unit becomes the individual cell. From the perspective of the NRC vision, CSB provides tools to (1) integrate information on the circuitry underlying toxicity pathway function and (2) evaluate expected dose-response behaviors based on control logic, such as positive and negative feedback, ultrasensitivity, bistability, and homeostatic control (Zhang et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2007, the U.S. National Research Council (NRC) released a report, "Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy," that proposes a paradigm shift for toxicity testing of environmental agents. The vision is based on the notion that exposure to environmental agents leads to adverse health outcomes through the perturbation of toxicity pathways that are operative in humans. Implementation of the NRC vision will involve a fundamental change in the assessment of toxicity of environmental agents, moving away from adverse health outcomes observed in experimental animals to the identification of critical perturbations of toxicity pathways. Pathway perturbations will be identified using in vitro assays and quantified for dose response using methods in computational toxicology and other recent scientific advances in basic biology. Implementation of the NRC vision will require a major research effort, not unlike that required to successfully map the human genome, extending over 10 to 20 years, involving the broad scientific community to map important toxicity pathways operative in humans. This article provides an overview of the scientific tools and technologies that will form the core of the NRC vision for toxicity testing. Of particular importance will be the development of rapidly performed in vitro screening assays using human cells and cell lines or human tissue surrogates to efficiently identify environmental agents producing critical pathway perturbations. In addition to the overview of the NRC vision, this study documents the reaction by a number of stakeholder groups since 2007, including the scientific, risk assessment, regulatory, and animal welfare communities.
    Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B 02/2010; 13(2-4):163-96. DOI:10.1080/10937404.2010.483933 · 5.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: First we define a new type of transition system in which states are symbolic (i.e., we should think of them as distributions on concrete states) and transitions are probabilistic. Apart from the in-tended meaning of states, this system type is equivalent to a special case of Segala's general PA. We propose a (non-deterministic) composition mechanism for this system type, as well as trace distribution and simu-lation semantics. (And pray very, very hard that these semantic notions are compositional.) Then we describe how to derive a transition system of the above type from a simple PIOA, using notions of probabilistic transition bundles and fibers. These notions are based on deterministic schedulers, as opposed to the more conventional randomized schedulers.
Show more