Visual experience affects handedness.

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Biopsychology, Department of Psychology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany.
Behavioural brain research (Impact Factor: 3.22). 11/2009; 207(2):447-51. DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.10.036
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In birds, a lateralised visual input during early development importantly modulates morphological and functional asymmetries of vision. We tested the hypothesis that human handedness similarly results from a combination of inborn and experience-driven factors by analysing sidedness in children suffering from congenital muscular torticollis. These children display a permanently tilted asymmetric head posture to the left or to the right in combination with a contralateral rotation of face and chin, which could lead to an increased visual experience of the hand contralateral to the head-tilt. Relative to controls, torticollis-children had a higher probability of right- or left-handedness when having a head-tilt to the opposite side. No statistical significant relation between head position and direction of functional asymmetries was found for footedness and eye-preference, although the means show a non-significant trend in the same direction as was observed for handedness. Thus, an increased visual control of the hand during early childhood seems to modulate handedness and possibly other lateral preferences to a lesser extent. These findings not only show that human handedness is affected by early lateralised visual experience but also speak in favour of a combined gene-environment model for its development.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Handedness is the single most studied aspect of human brain asymmetries. For long it has been thought to be a monogenic trait that can produce an asymmetrical shift of cerebral mechanisms, thereby producing right handedness. Nevertheless, a single gene explaining a sufficient amount of phenotypic variance has not been identified. The results of several recent studies using advanced molecular genetic techniques suggest that a multifactorial model taking into account both multiple genetic and environmental factors, as well as their interactions, might be better suited to explain the complex processes underlying the ontogenesis of handedness. In this article, we review the new insights into handedness genetics provided by these studies and discuss, how integrating results from genetic and neuroscientific studies might help us to generate more accurate models of the ontogenesis of handedness. Based on these thoughts, we suggest several candidate gene groups (e.g. genes involved in the formation of the corpus callosum, asymmetrically expressed genes or genes involved in the development of structural left-right asymmetries) whose investigation would help to further understand the complex relation of genes, the brain and handedness.
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 09/2013; · 9.44 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper reviews the earliest documented manual and postural asymmetries, in the fetus and during the first months of life. I attempt to analyze which genetic and/or environmental factors are likely to trigger each one, as well as its consequences for the other ones. I conclude that right-handedness is prevalent in all cultures because an intrinsic tendency toward right-handedness has many occasions to be reinforced, from the uterine to the perinatal environment and from the familial to the cultural environment. Finally, the combination of potential genetic factors-direct (motoric) or indirect (postural)-with varied biological and cultural environmental influences over various periods during development may explain the high variability of handedness in typical populations (as long as hand preference is not equated with the hand used for writing).
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 04/2013; · 4.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study is twofold. First, we tested the view that individuals who do not develop a typically strong behavioral laterality are distributed differentially among the two genders across age. Second, we examined whether left-handedness and mixed-handedness are associated with an elevated risk of some developmental or cognitive deficits. A special recruitment procedure provided norms of the Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure copy (ROCF) from large samples of left-handed (N=420) and mixed-handed (N=72) compared to right-handed (N=420) schoolchildren and adults (N=545). This graphic task was considered as reflective of the growth of visual-spatial skills and impairment at copying as a developmental risk. Subjects’ hand preference was assessed by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Data analysis indicated that: (1) The trend towards consistent right-handedness is sex-related. Girls are clearly ahead of boys in this lateralization process and boys are over-represented in mixed-handed subjects. The greater prevalence of mixed-handed boys compared to girls decreases with age. (2) Performance on drawing the ROCF varies according to age and handedness groups. Mixed-handed subjects scored worse in all age groups. The results are discussed in relation to the hormonal-developmental, neuropathological, and learning theories of lateralization.
    Child Development Research. 01/2013;


Available from