Visual experience affects handedness.

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Biopsychology, Department of Psychology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany.
Behavioural brain research (Impact Factor: 3.22). 11/2009; 207(2):447-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.10.036
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In birds, a lateralised visual input during early development importantly modulates morphological and functional asymmetries of vision. We tested the hypothesis that human handedness similarly results from a combination of inborn and experience-driven factors by analysing sidedness in children suffering from congenital muscular torticollis. These children display a permanently tilted asymmetric head posture to the left or to the right in combination with a contralateral rotation of face and chin, which could lead to an increased visual experience of the hand contralateral to the head-tilt. Relative to controls, torticollis-children had a higher probability of right- or left-handedness when having a head-tilt to the opposite side. No statistical significant relation between head position and direction of functional asymmetries was found for footedness and eye-preference, although the means show a non-significant trend in the same direction as was observed for handedness. Thus, an increased visual control of the hand during early childhood seems to modulate handedness and possibly other lateral preferences to a lesser extent. These findings not only show that human handedness is affected by early lateralised visual experience but also speak in favour of a combined gene-environment model for its development.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Infants with congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) are at risk of delay in achieving their motor milestones. The aim of this study was to investigate if CMT or time in a prone position as an infant had any influence on motor development at preschool age. DESIGN: A case control study. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one children who had participated in a previous study investigating motor development in infants with CMT and a control group of infants without CMT. METHOD: A follow-up at the age of 3.5 to 5 years, the Movement Assessment Battery for Children was used with the earlier CMT group and the control group to assess their motor development. An independent physiotherapist, who was blinded of the children's previous group belonging, assessed the children MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: percentile scores of motor development. RESULTS: Multiple regression showed no impact on earlier group belonging or the amount of time spent in prone as an infant. The left-handed children had a significantly (p < .01) lower percentile in the Movement ABC. CONCLUSIONS: Neither CMT nor spending limited periods of time in prone when awake as an infant have any significant long-term effects on motor development.
    PM&R 05/2013; · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the discovery of brain asymmetry in a wide range of vertebrate species, it has become possible to study development and expression of lateralized behavior accurately in well-controlled experiments. Several species have emerged as useful models for investigating aspects of lateralization. Discussed here are: (1) the influence of exposure to light during embryonic development on lateralization, (2) effects of steroid hormones on lateralization, (3) developmental changes in which hemisphere is controlling behavior, and (4) asymmetry in memory formation and recall. The findings have bearing on understanding the development of hemispheric specialization in humans and are likely to provide insight into dysfunctional behavior associated with weak or absent lateralization and impaired interhemispheric communication (e.g., autism, schizophrenia, dyslexia). This review features research on chicks, pigeons and zebrafish, with the addition of some recent evidence of lateralization in bees. Discoveries made using these species have highlighted the interaction between experience, hormones and genetic factors during development, and have provided some of the first clear evidence of the advantage of having a lateralized brain. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    genesis 01/2014; · 2.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Handedness is the single most studied aspect of human brain asymmetries. For long it has been thought to be a monogenic trait that can produce an asymmetrical shift of cerebral mechanisms, thereby producing right handedness. Nevertheless, a single gene explaining a sufficient amount of phenotypic variance has not been identified. The results of several recent studies using advanced molecular genetic techniques suggest that a multifactorial model taking into account both multiple genetic and environmental factors, as well as their interactions, might be better suited to explain the complex processes underlying the ontogenesis of handedness. In this article, we review the new insights into handedness genetics provided by these studies and discuss, how integrating results from genetic and neuroscientific studies might help us to generate more accurate models of the ontogenesis of handedness. Based on these thoughts, we suggest several candidate gene groups (e.g. genes involved in the formation of the corpus callosum, asymmetrically expressed genes or genes involved in the development of structural left-right asymmetries) whose investigation would help to further understand the complex relation of genes, the brain and handedness.
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 09/2013; · 10.28 Impact Factor


Available from