Article

Validation of the telephone interview for cognitive status-modified in subjects with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia

Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Neuroepidemiology (Impact Factor: 2.48). 11/2009; 34(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1159/000255464
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The telephone assessment of cognitive functions may reduce the cost and burden of epidemiological studies.
We validated the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) using an extensive in-person assessment as the standard for comparison. Clinical diagnoses of normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia were established by consensus of physician, nurse, and neuropsychological assessments.
The extensive in-person assessment classified 83 persons with normal cognition, 42 persons with MCI, and 42 persons with dementia. There was considerable overlap in TICS-m scores among the three groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified < or = 31 as the optimal cutoff score to separate subjects with MCI from subjects with normal cognition (sensitivity = 71.4%; subjects with dementia excluded), and < or = 27 to separate subjects with dementia from subjects with MCI (sensitivity = 69.0%; subjects with normal cognition excluded). The TICS-m performed well when subjects with MCI were pooled either with subjects with dementia (sensitivity = 83.3%) or with subjects with normal cognition (sensitivity = 83.3%).
Although the TICS-m performed well when using a dichotomous classification of cognitive status, it performed only fairly in separating MCI from either normal cognition or dementia. The TICS-m should not be used as a free-standing tool to identify subjects with MCI, and it should be used with caution as a tool to detect dementia.

0 Followers
 · 
103 Views
  • Source
    • "79% females ), a subset from a larger trial evaluating stressreducing aromatherapy effects (clinical trial ID number NCT01307748), were recruited from the community through advertisements. Eligibility criteria were assessed by a phone interview and included (1) age between 50 and 85 years; (2) good physical and cognitive health (score ≥31 on the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status [28]); (3) score ≥9 on the Perceived Stress Scale [29] indicating presence of stress; (4) no medications affecting CNS or physiologic measures; (5) healthy olfactory function; and (6) nonsmoking. The study was approved by the Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. Stress-reducing therapies help maintain cognitive performance during stress. Aromatherapy is popular for stress reduction, but its effectiveness and mechanism are unclear. This study examined stress-reducing effects of aromatherapy on cognitive function using the go/no-go (GNG) task performance and event related potentials (ERP) components sensitive to stress. The study also assessed the importance of expectancy in aromatherapy actions. Methods. 81 adults were randomized to 3 aroma groups (active experimental, detectable, and undetectable placebo) and 2 prime subgroups (prime suggesting stress-reducing aroma effects or no-prime). GNG performance, ERPs, subjective expected aroma effects, and stress ratings were assessed at baseline and poststress. Results. No specific aroma effects on stress or cognition were observed. However, regardless of experienced aroma, people receiving a prime displayed faster poststress median reaction times than those receiving no prime. A significant interaction for N200 amplitude indicated divergent ERP patterns between baseline and poststress for go and no-go stimuli depending on the prime subgroup. Furthermore, trends for beneficial prime effects were shown on poststress no-go N200/P300 latencies and N200 amplitude. Conclusion. While there were no aroma-specific effects on stress or cognition, these results highlight the role of expectancy for poststress response inhibition and attention.
    Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 01/2015; 2015:1-10. DOI:10.1155/2015/419812 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "We excluded participants who did not answer the telephone interview themselves (n = 185) and those with cognitive impairment (n = 146) as determined with TICS-m (Telephone interview for cognitive status – modified) (Breitner & Welsh 1995; Crooks et al. 2005; Perneczky 2003) using a cut off value of 27 (Knopman et al. 2010). Eighty-four participants with missing values on the resilience scale were excluded. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess reliability and validity of the Resilience Scale 11 (RS-11) and develop a shorter scale in a population-based study. The RS-11 scale was administered to 3942 participants (aged 64 - 94 years) of the KORA-Age study. To test reliability, factor analyses were carried out and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) was measured. Construct validity was measured by correlating scores with psychological constructs. The criterion for a shorter scale was a minimum internal consistency of .80. Shorter models were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of RS-5 to RS-11 was analyzed. Factor analysis of the RS-11 gave a 1-factor solution. Internal consistency was α = .86. A shorter version of the scale was developed with 5 items, which also gave a 1-factor solution and showed good validity. Internal consistency of this shorter scale: Resilience Scale 5 (RS-5) was α = .80. Sensitivity and specificity of RS-5 compared with RS-11 were .79 and .91 respectively. Both scales correlated significantly in expected directions with related constructs. The RS-11 and the RS-5 are reliable, consistent and valid instruments to measure the ability of elderly individuals to successfully cope with change and misfortune.
    11/2013; 1(1). DOI:10.1186/2050-7283-1-25
  • Source
Show more

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from