Article

10th survey of antimicrobial resistance in noninvasive clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in Belgium during winter 2007-2008.

WIV/ISP, Unit of Antibiotic Research, Institute of Public Health, 642, Engelandstraat, 1180 Brussel, Belgium.
Pathologie Biologie (Impact Factor: 1.67). 11/2009; 58(2):147-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.patbio.2009.07.018
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of the study was to evaluate the antibiotic resistance in noninvasive clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in Belgium during winter 2008-2007.
Four hundred and forty eight unduplicated isolates collected by 15 laboratories were tested by microdilution following CLSI.
Insusceptibility rates (I+R) were as follows: penicillin G (PEN) 11.6% (4.0% R), ampicillin 11.4% (4.0% R), amoxicillin+/-clavulanic acid 0, cefaclor 10.3% (9.6% R), cefuroxime 9.2% (8.7% R), cefuroxime-axetil 8.7% (7.8% R), cefotaxime, ceftazidime and cefepime 2.0% (0% R), imipenem 2.5% (0% R), ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin 5.1% (0.4% R), levofloxacin 0.7% (0.4% R), moxifloxacin 0.4% (0.2% R), erythromycin (ERY) 29.7% (29.2% R), azithromycin 29.7% (28.8% R), telithromycin 0%, clindamycin 26.3% (25.4% R) and tetracycline (TET) 21.9% (16.5% R). From 2001 to 2008, a significant decrease in penicillin-insusceptibility (21.0% to 11.6%), penicillin-resistance (9.7% to 4.0%) and ciprofloxacin-insusceptibility (11.2% to 5.1%) was found. Cross-resistance between penicillin and other betalactams in penicillin-insusceptible isolates was incomplete: all these isolates remained fully susceptible to amoxicillin. Erythromycin-insusceptibility was significantly higher in children than in adults (43.9%/27.4%), while penicillin-insusceptibility significantly higher in Brussels than in the Flanders (22.9%/8.1%). The commonest resistance phenotype was ERY-TET (12.7%) followed by ERY (7.4%) and PEN-ERY-TET (5.8%). Capsular types 19 (25%), 14 (19.3%), 23 (15.4%) and 15 (13.5%) were the most important in penicillin-insusceptible.
We noted a decrease in resistance to the majority of the compounds. Insusceptibility rates were higher in children than in adults and the difference between the north and the south of Belgium became less marked.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
101 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic lung allograft rejection is the single most important cause of death in lung transplant recipients after the first postoperative year, resulting in a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%, which is far behind that of other solid organ transplantations. Spirometry is routinely used as a clinical marker for assessing pulmonary allograft function and diagnosing chronic lung allograft rejection after lung transplantation (LTx). As such, a progressive obstructive decline in pulmonary allograft function (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV1]) in absence of all other causes (currently defined as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS]) is considered to reflect the evolution of chronic lung allograft rejection. BOS has a 5-year prevalence of approximately 45% and is thought to be the final common endpoint of various alloimmunologic and nonalloimmunologic injuries to the pulmonary allograft, triggering different innate and adaptive immune responses. Most preventive and therapeutic strategies for this complex process have thus far been largely unsuccessful. However, the introduction of the neomacrolide antibiotic azithromycin (AZI) in the field of LTx as of 2003 made it clear that some patients with established BOS might in fact benefit from such therapy due to its various antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, as summarized in this review. Particularly in patients with an increased bronchoalveolar lavage neutrophilia (i.e., 15%-20% or more), AZI treatment could result in an increase in FEV1 of at least 10%. More recently, it has become clear that prophylactic therapy with AZI actually may prevent BOS and improve FEV1 after LTx, most likely through its interactions with the innate immune system. However, one should always be aware of possible adverse effects related to AZI when implementing this drug as prophylactic or long-term treatment. Even so, AZI therapy after LTx can generally be considered as safe.
    Transplantation 03/2012; 94(2):101-9. · 3.78 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
7 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014