A 37-Year-Old Man Trying to Choose a High-Quality Hospital: Review of Hospital Quality Indicators (vol 302, pg 2353, 2009)

Silverman Institute for Health Care Quality and Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 11/2009; 302(21):2353-60. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1684
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Mr A, a previously healthy 37-year-old man, was diagnosed as having Prinzmetal angina and a hypercoagulable state 3 years ago after an ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Now, his cardiologist is moving and Mr A must select a new physician and health system. Geographic relocation, insurance changes, and other events force millions in the United States to change physicians and hospitals every year. Mr A should begin by choosing a primary care physician, since continuity and coordination of care improves outcomes. Evidence for evaluating specific physicians is less robust, though a variety of sources are available. A broad range of detailed quality information, such as Medicare's Hospital Compare (, is available for selecting a hospital. However, the relationship of these metrics to patient outcomes is variable, and different Web sites provide meaningfully different rankings and data interpretations. For Mr A in particular, a warfarin management team, the hospital's location, and a cardiologist with whom he feels comfortable and who can communicate with his primary care physician are important factors. Nevertheless, hospital quality information and metrics are an important component of the strategy Mr A should take to solve this challenging problem.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: HintergrundPatienten wollen die Behandlerwahl (mit-)entscheiden. Veröffentlichte Qualitätsinformationen sollen hierbei helfen, werden aber selten genutzt. Wie Patienten bei der Krankenhauswahl vor elektiven operativen Eingriffen in Deutschland tatsächlich vorgehen und ob sie die Krankenhausqualitätsberichte nutzen, wurde für den Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss untersucht. MethodeIn einer querschnittlichen Untersuchung wurden 48 stationäre Patienten aus fünf Fachgebieten nach elektivem Eingriff in vier Krankenhäusern zu ihren Wahlkriterien und Informationsquellen und der Verwendung der gesetzlichen Qualitätsberichte befragt. Die Daten wurden deskriptiv ausgewertet. ErgebnissePatienten ist bei elektivem Krankenhausaufenthalt die eigene Wahl sehr wichtig, und sie treffen sie auch überwiegend selber. Fast immer besteht ausreichend Zeit, sich vorab zu informieren. Die drei häufigsten Wahlkriterien sind die eigene Vorerfahrung mit dem Krankenhaus, die Wohnortnähe und die Kompetenz der Klinik. Die wichtigsten Informationsquellen sind Angehörige, Vorkontakt in der Krankenhausambulanz und die eigenen ambulanten Behandler; schriftliche Informationen werden nur ergänzend verwendet. Die gesetzlichen Qualitätsberichte sind nicht bekannt und werden nicht verwendet. BackgroundPatients want to decide on health care providers. Published quality reports are supposed to help but are rarely used. How patients manage choosing a hospital for elective surgery in Germany and whether they use the hospital quality reports was explored for the Federal Joint Committee. MethodA cross-sectional survey asked 48 hospitalized patients from 5 specialties in 4 hospitals after elective surgery about their criteria and sources of information, and their use of the compulsory quality reports for choosing the hospital. Data were analyzed descriptively. ResultsTo choose their hospital is very important for patients with elective surgery and they do so. Usually there is enough time to obtain information before admission. The three main criteria are own experience with a hospital, short distance from their homes, and the hospital’s expertise. The main sources of information are relatives, contact with the hospital’s outpatient departments, and patient’s ambulatory health care provider. Written information is only used as supplementary information. The compulsory quality reports are not known and, hence, are not used. SchlüsselwörterKrankenhauswahl–Patientenautonomie–Querschnittsuntersuchung–Deutsches Gesundheitssystem–Elektive operative Eingriffe KeywordsHospital choice–Patient autonomy–Cross-sectional survey–German health care system–Elective surgery
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 08/2011; 54(8):951-957. DOI:10.1007/s00103-011-1320-3 · 1.01 Impact Factor
  • Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 08/2011; 9(8):660-4. DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.038 · 6.53 Impact Factor
  • JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 03/2012; 307(9):965. DOI:10.1001/jama.2012.210 · 30.39 Impact Factor