Cancer Screening And Age In The United States And Europe

Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.64). 11/2009; 28(6):1838-47. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.1838
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We compare cancer screening rates between the United States and Europe. Many European countries have organized screening programs, whereas the U.S. approach is relatively decentralized. Many European countries, unlike the United States, also impose upper age limits on screening. Overall, European screening rates were 22-88 percent of the corresponding U.S. rates. U.S. residents are more likely to be screened at younger ages, when the expected benefit from early detection is the greatest, but also at older ages, when the expected benefit is declining.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The time it takes for individuals to realize that their emerging colorectal cancer (CRC) symptoms are serious is often an impediment to expeditious help-seeking. Tailored educational efforts to hasten symptom appraisal time would benefit from knowledge of the characteristics of individuals who tend to neglect their symptoms as well as the nature of symptoms that are most often neglected. In a sample of 112 CRC patients, we investigated associations between duration of symptom appraisal and: (1) trait anxiety, and (2) tumor location, which affects symptomatology. Symptom appraisal duration was associated with a sex-by-anxiety interaction (p = 0.007). The longest times (in weeks) were among high anxiety females (Mdn = 26.0) and low anxiety males (Mdn = 17.0), with shorter times among low anxiety females (Mdn = 9.0) and high anxiety males (Mdn = 2.0). Symptom appraisal times were also longer for patients with distal (vs. proximal) tumors (p = 0.036).
    Journal of Behavioral Medicine 05/2013; DOI:10.1007/s10865-013-9519-4 · 3.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using the 1980 to 2002 General Social Survey, a repeated cross-sectional study that has been linked to the National Death Index through 2008, this study examines the changing relationship between self-rated health and mortality. Research has established that self-rated health has exceptional predictive validity with respect to mortality, but this validity may be deteriorating in light of the rapid medicalization of seemingly superficial conditions and increasingly high expectations for good health. Yet the current study shows the validity of self-rated health is increasing over time. Individuals are apparently better at assessing their health in 2002 than they were in 1980 and, for this reason, the relationship between self-rated health and mortality is considerably stronger across all levels of self-rated health. Several potential mechanisms for this increase are explored. More schooling and more cognitive ability increase the predictive validity of self-rated health, but neither of these influences explains the growing association between self-rated health and mortality. The association is also invariant to changing causes of death, including a decline in accidental deaths, which are, by definition, unanticipated by the individual. Using data from the final two waves of data, we find suggestive evidence that exposure to more health information is the driving force, but we also show that the source of information is very important. For example, the relationship between self-rated health and mortality is smaller among those who use the internet to find health information than among those who do not.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(1):e84933. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0084933 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To measure the impact of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) breast cancer screening recommendation, which recommended against routine screening for women aged 40 to 49 and stated that there was “insufficient evidence” to recommend screening for women aged 75 and older, on mammography rates.Methods Self-reported mammography rates were calculated using the 2006–2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (n = 29,857). The paper reports mammography rates by age group (40 to 49, 50 to 74, and 75 and older), adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and region. The study was performed at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, USA in 2012.ResultsDifferences in mammography rates between 2010 and earlier years were not significant. Among women aged 40–49, biennial mammography rates declined by − 0.5 percentage points between 2006 to 2009 and 2010 (95% confidence interval [CI]: − 3.0 to 1.9; p = 0.67). Among women aged 50–74, rates declined by − 0.07 percentage points (95% CI: − 1.8 to 1.7; p = 0.93). Among women aged 75 years and older, rates declined by − 0.1 percentage points (95% CI: − 4.2 to 3.9; p = 0.94).Conclusion The revision to the USPSTF breast cancer screening recommendation did not affect screening patterns.
    Preventive Medicine 11/2012; 55(5):485–487. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.09.012 · 2.93 Impact Factor