Abdominal wall repair using human acellular dermal matrix: a follow-up study.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Houston, TX, USA.
American journal of surgery (Impact Factor: 2.36). 11/2009; 198(5):650-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.027
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The role of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is unclear. The aim of this study was to review the management, complications, and long-term outcomes of AWR using ADM in a large surgical cohort.
Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing AWR using ADM from 2004 to 2007 was performed. Demographic data, comorbidities, complications, and long-term outcomes were collected.
There were 77 cases in 68 patients with mean age of 61.1 +/- 1.4 years. The most common indication was infected fascia (n = 19 [25%]). Wound closure was achieved in 75% of the cases via primary (n = 26 [45%]), secondary intention (n = 17 [29%]), or skin graft (n = 15 [26%]). Nonprimary closure was achieved in 5.7 +/- .7 months. There were 32 perioperative (39%) and 33 long-term (43%) complications. Over a mean follow-up period of 13.2 +/- 1.5 months, the hernia recurrence rate was 27% (n = 21).
Although ADM is a viable option in AWR, the high hernia recurrence rate warrants a continued search for alternative biologic materials to improve outcomes.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mesh implantation during abdominal wall reconstruction decreases rates of ventral hernia recurrence and has become the dominant method of repair. The authors provide a comprehensive comparison of surgical outcomes and complications by location of mesh placement following ventral hernia repair with onlay, interposition, retrorectus, or underlay mesh. A systematic search of the English literature published from 1996 to 2012 in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library databases was conducted to identify patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction using either prosthetic or biological mesh for ventral hernia repair. Demographic information was obtained from each study. Sixty-two relevant articles were included with 5824 patients treated with mesh repair of a ventral hernia between 1996 and 2012. Mesh position included onlay (19.6 percent), underlay (60.7 percent), interposition (6.4 percent), and retrorectus (12.4 percent). Prosthetic mesh was used in 80 percent of repairs and biological mesh in 20 percent. The weighted mean incidences of early events were as follows: wound complications, 19 percent; wound infections, 8 percent; seroma or hematoma formation, 11 percent; and reoperation, 10 percent. The weighted mean incidences of late complications included 8 percent for hernia recurrence and 2 percent for mesh explantation. Recurrence rates were highest for onlay (17 percent) or interposition (17 percent) reinforcement. The infection rate was also highest in the interposition cohort (25 percent). Seroma rates were lowest following a retrorectus repair (4 percent). Mesh reinforcement of a ventral hernia repair is safe and efficacious, but the location of the reinforcement appears to influence outcomes. Underlay or retrorectus mesh placement is associated with lower recurrence rates.
    Plastic and reconstructive surgery 11/2013; 132(5):1295-304. · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) continues to be a challenge for surgeons. Poor long-term durability of the commonly-used human acellular dermal matrix (HADM) grafts often results in VHR failure and reherniation. We hypothesized that fiber-reinforcement will improve the mechanical properties of HADM grafts and maintain these properties after enzymatic degradation. We designed a reinforced HADM (r-HADM) graft comprised of HADM and a small amount (~10wt% or 56g/m(2)) of 2-0 monofilament polypropylene. We evaluated the failure and fatigue biomechanics of r-HADM grafts and HADM controls, before and after 8h of in vitro enzymatic degradation, in ball-burst and planar biaxial testing modes (n=6-11/group/test). Fiber-reinforcement improved time-zero failure properties of HADM. While enzymatic degradation resulted in a significant reduction in nearly all mechanical properties and frequent premature failure of HADM, key sub-failure parameters and cyclic dilatational strain were maintained in r-HADM, with no sample having premature failure. These data show that fiber-reinforcement improves biomechanical properties and imparts mechanical durability to r-HADM during enzymatic degradation. Our findings suggest that fiber-reinforcement may be a strategy to mitigate the loss of HADM graft mechanical properties after in vivo implantation, and thereby limit VHR bulging and improve outcomes.
    Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 03/2014; 34C:320-329.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This retrospective comparative study analyzes the outcome of patients affected by incisional hernia in potentially contaminated or contaminated field, treated by three operative techniques. 152 patients (62 M:90 F; mean age 65 ± 14 years) underwent incisional hernia repair (January 2002-January 2012) in complicated settings. Criteria of inclusion in the study were represented by the following causes of admission: mesh rejection/infection, obstruction without gangrene but with possible peritoneal bacterial translocation, obstruction with gangrene, enterocutaneous fistula or simultaneous presence of ileo- or colostomy. The patients were divided into three groups: A (n = 76), treated with primary closure technique; B and C (n = 38 each), with reinforcement by synthetic or pericardium bovine mesh (Tutomesh(®)), respectively. The prosthetic groups were divided into Onlay and Sublay subgroups. Significant decreases in C vs A were observed for wound infection (3 vs 37 %) and recurrence (0 vs 14 %), and in C vs B for wound infection (3 vs 53 %), seroma (0 vs 34 %) and recurrence (0 vs 16 %). Patients with concomitant bowel resection (BR) (43 %) showed (all P < 0.05) an increase of overall morbidity (55 vs 33 %) and wound infection rate (42 vs 24 %) compared to cases without BR. Morbidity presented no significant differences in C-Onlay or Sublay subgroups. B-Sublay subgroup has (all P < 0.05) lower overall morbidity (20 vs 75 %), wound infection (10 vs 68 %) and seroma (0 vs 46 %) than B-Onlay. The pericardium bovine patch seems to be safe and effective to successfully repair ventral hernia in potentially contaminated operative fields, especially in association with bowel resection.
    Hernia 03/2014; · 1.69 Impact Factor