Article

A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiences.

Research and Evaluation, at Commonwealth Fund in New York City, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.64). 11/2009; 28(6):w1171-83. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1171
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This 2009 survey of primary care doctors in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States finds wide differences in practice systems, incentives, perceptions of access to care, use of health information technology (IT), and programs to improve quality. Response rates exceeded 40 percent except in four countries: Canada, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States. U.S. and Canadian physicians lag in the adoption of IT. U.S. doctors were the most likely to report that there are insurance restrictions on obtaining medication and treatment for their patients and that their patients often have difficulty with costs. We believe that opportunities exist for cross-national learning in disease management, use of teams, and performance feedback to improve primary care globally.

Full-text

Available from: Sandra Applebaum, Jan 02, 2014
2 Bookmarks
 · 
147 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Care management has become a widespread strategy for improving chronic illness care. However, primary care provider (PCP) participation in programs has been poor. Because the success of care management relies on provider engagement, understanding provider perspectives is necessary. Our goal was to identify care management functions most valuable to PCPs in hypertension treatment. Six focus groups were conducted to discuss current challenges in hypertension care and identify specific functions of care management that would improve care. The study included 39 PCPs (participation rate: 83 %) representing six clinics, two of which care for large African American populations and four that are in underserved locations, in the greater Baltimore metropolitan area. This was a qualitative analysis of focus groups, using grounded theory and iterative coding. Providers desired achieving blood pressure control more rapidly. Collaborating with care managers who obtain ongoing patient data would allow treatment plans to be tailored to the changing life conditions of patients. The P.A.R.T.N.E.R. framework summarizes the care management functions that providers reported were necessary for effective collaboration: Partner with patients, providers, and the community; Arrange follow-up care; Resolve barriers to adherence; Track treatment response and progress; Navigate the health care system with patients; Educate patients & Engage patients in self-management; Relay information between patients and/or provider(s). The P.A.R.T.N.E.R. framework is the first to offer a checklist of care management functions that may promote successful collaboration with PCPs. Future research should examine the validity of this framework in various settings and for diverse patient populations affected by chronic diseases.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2014; DOI:10.1007/s11606-014-3130-4 · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study we examine after-hours calls at 2 primary-care, nurse-managed health centers to identify the role and cost saving of having an after-hours call system for averting emergency department (ED) visits. Data were collected over a 1-year period on a standardized template. Fifty percent of the 124 calls averted an ED visit, saving an estimated $19,406. Another 43% of the calls were for non-urgent concerns and only 9 (7%) calls resulted in an ED referral. Findings suggest that a process for documenting after-hours calls can reduce systems costs and improve communication between providers.
    The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 02/2015; 11(2). DOI:10.1016/j.nurpra.2014.07.042
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As we are moving into new paradigms of care, sharing of health information becomes crucial. We need new systems and more interconnectivity to support this. The regional approach to eHealth solutions in New Zealand hinges on establishing trusted and interoperable systems. The Interoperability Reference Architecture is a first step towards providing overall principles and standards to reach this goal. A core group from the Sector Architects Group was formed and prepared the first draft of this document. After initial internal feedback it went through wider consultation – including public. Good feedback was received, including international. It then went through formal HISO processes and was approved as a national interim standard. The Reference Architecture comprises three pillars which define: 1) XDS based access to clinical data repositories, 2) a common content model underpinned by CCR and openEHR Archetypes to which all health information exchange should conform, and 3) use of CDA as common currency for payload. A trial implementation is yet to be conducted, however we used the Content Model to align ePrescribing data model with the Australian model in order to validate the methodology. The Reference Architecture will provide an incremental step-by-step implementation approach to interoperability and thus minimise risk.
    11th Annual Health Informatics New Zealand (HINZ) Conference, Rotorua; 11/2012