Article

Postoperative pain survey in Italy (POPSI): a snapshot of current national practices.

Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, La Sapienza University of Rome, ICOT-Polo Pontino, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Minerva anestesiologica (Impact Factor: 2.82). 11/2009; 75(11):622-31.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Over the last several years, significant efforts have been directed towards improving the quality of postoperative pain management. As data are lacking on the organization and quality of these services in Italy, we surveyed current Italian practices.
A 16-item questionnaire was randomly supplied to 650 anesthesiologists attending the Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine (SIAARTI) National Congress in 2006. The survey requested information concerning their current practices in analgesic techniques, use of guidelines, educational programs, availability of an Acute Pain Service (APS), and existing barriers to optimal postoperative pain management.
Based on 588 respondents, a sample of 163 hospitals was analyzed (24.4% of Italian public hospitals); 41.7% of the surveyed hospitals had an organized APS. University and teaching hospitals had an organized APS more frequently than did other hospitals (P<0.02). Continuous intravenous analgesia using elastomeric infusion systems was the most commonly used analgesic technique, performed in 44% of the treated patients. The frequency of both intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and epidural techniques was extremely low (5% and 13%, respectively). The main reasons given for suboptimal pain relief were inadequate training of surgeons and nurses (44.3%), poor organization (29.9%), and lack of equipment (21.5%). A total of 51.2% of the respondents would like to have a dedicated anesthesiologist assigned on a daily rotational basis to postoperative pain management.
A comparison to international survey data showed that postoperative pain management in Italy is still below the European standards. Additional efforts to overcome these hurdles and to reach an acceptable level of quality are required.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
75 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The combination of ketamine and remifentanil seems to be associated with better analgesia and duration. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a ketamineremifentanil combination promotes improved postoperative analgesia. Prospective, randomized, double blind study of 40 patients undergoing video laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesia was performed with remifentanil, propofol, atracurium, and 50% oxygen. Group 1 (GI) patients received remifentanil (0.4mcg.kg(-1).min(-1)) and ketamine (5mcg.kg(-1).min(-1)) and Group 2 (G2) received remifentanil (0.4mcg.kg(-1).min(-1)) and saline solution. Morphine 0.1mg.kg(-1) was administered at the end of the procedure, and postoperative pain was treated with morphine via PCA. We evaluated the severity of postoperative pain by a numerical scale from zero to 10 during 24hours. We registered the time to the first analgesic supplementation, amount of morphine used in the first 24hours, and adverse effects. There was a decrease in pain severity between extubation and other times evaluated in G1 and G2. There was no signifi cant difference in pain intensity between the groups. There was no difference between G1 (22±24.9min) and G2 (21.5±28.1min) regarding time to first dose of morphine and dose supplement of morphine consumed in G1 (29±18.4mg) and G2 (25.1±13.3mg). The combination of ketamine (5mcg.kg(-1).min(-1)) and remifentanil (0.4mcg.kg(-1).min(-1)) for cholecystectomy did not alter the severity of postoperative pain, time to first analgesic supplementation or dose of morphine in 24hours.
    Revista brasileira de anestesiologia 03/2013; 63(2):178-82.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two decades of attention have focused on regional anesthesia, both central neuraxial blockades as well as peripheral blocks. Though there are a considerable number of recent publications on the topic, the complex issues around the effect of regional anesthesia on outcome have not been completely resolved, possibly because the data are often not procedure-specific.In this survey, we tried to focus on current Italian practice and therapeutical criteria in the management of postoperative pain. We also evaluated how the clinical practice of the respondents follows the international and national guidelines for postoperative pain.A questionnaire was mailed to 64 anesthesiologists who had been identified from a database kept by the RICALOR Group (Registro Italiano Complicanze Anestesia LOcoRegionale – Italian Registry of Complications during Locoregional Anesthesia). The survey requested information regarding demographic data and general management, postoperative pain management and guidelines, and specific questions on epidural analgesia and on peripheral blocks.Only 35 of the 64 anesthesiologists answered the questionnaire and sended it back for analysis. Basing on these 35 returns, data from 51 surgical units (some respondent referred data of more surgical units) leading to 135 departments (surgical units may be constituted by more departments) were analyzed. A total of 245,382 surgical procedures were analyzed. Regional analgesia was used in 46.71% of the procedures.In university and teaching-hospitals, protocols concerning regional anesthesia were attended and shared with the whole staff more often than in non-teaching hospitals (P = 0.0001).For postoperative pain management 31.48% of responders used <10% of regional analgesia, 20.37% used 10–30%, 25.93% used 30–50%, 14.81% used 50–75% and 7.41% used >75% of regional analgesia.We identified a huge variety of responses regarding therapeutical protocols but the majority of responders used the drugs with the best safety/efficacy profile.In conclusion, we demonstrated an improvement in the management of postoperative pain compared to previous studies, but still efforts should be made to standardize daily practice in order to avoid complications and improve safety.
    European Journal of Pain Supplements. 01/2010;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In acute pain models, coadministration of low doses of morphine and oxycodone markedly enhanced analgesia relative to either opioid given alone. Enhanced analgesia with coadministration of morphine and oxycodone has also been reported in acute and chronic moderate to severe pain conditions during double-blind studies. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a flexible dose regimen of the morphine/oxycodone combination versus oxycodone/acetaminophen and fixed low-dose morphine/oxycodone. METHODS: This was a 5-center, randomized, open-label study of hospitalized patients (n = 44) with acute moderate to severe postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty. Inpatients were randomized to a flexible dose regimen of morphine/oxycodone (3 mg/2 mg to 24 mg/16 mg), fixed low-dose morphine/oxycodone regimen (3 mg/2 mg), or oxycodone/acetaminophen (5 mg/325 mg). Treatment was initiated following surgery after intravenous (IV) morphine patient-controlled analgesia. An algorithm was evaluated for converting the patient-controlled analgesia morphine dose to an initial oral dose of morphine/oxycodone. The primary efficacy variable was the time-weighted sum of pain intensity difference from 0 to 48 hours. RESULTS: The median values for the sum of the pain intensity difference from 0 to 48 hours for the morphine/oxycodone flexible dose and oxycodone/acetaminophen were similar and approximately twice that of fixed morphine/oxycodone 3 mg/2 mg (148.0, 139.5, and 71.3, respectively). Moderate to severe gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in 50% of patients in the oxycodone/acetaminophen group compared with 15% of the equianalgesic morphine/oxycodone group. On several items of the Brief Pain Inventory (general activity, walking ability, and sleep), the morphine/oxycodone flexible dose produced greater benefit than oxycodone/acetaminophen. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible dose morphine/oxycodone was superior to low-dose morphine/oxycodone and comparable to oxycodone/acetaminophen. Flexible dose morphine/oxycodone-treated patients had a lower rate of moderate to severe nausea or vomiting than equianalgesic oxycodone/acetaminophen-treated patients. Thus, morphine/oxycodone offers an attractive alternative to oxycodone/acetaminophen for the management of moderate to severe postoperative pain. ClinicalTrials.gov: identifier: NCT00818493.
    Clinical Therapeutics 03/2013; · 2.23 Impact Factor