Postoperative pain survey in Italy (POPSI): a snapshot of current national practices.

Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, La Sapienza University of Rome, ICOT-Polo Pontino, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Minerva anestesiologica (Impact Factor: 2.27). 11/2009; 75(11):622-31.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Over the last several years, significant efforts have been directed towards improving the quality of postoperative pain management. As data are lacking on the organization and quality of these services in Italy, we surveyed current Italian practices.
A 16-item questionnaire was randomly supplied to 650 anesthesiologists attending the Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine (SIAARTI) National Congress in 2006. The survey requested information concerning their current practices in analgesic techniques, use of guidelines, educational programs, availability of an Acute Pain Service (APS), and existing barriers to optimal postoperative pain management.
Based on 588 respondents, a sample of 163 hospitals was analyzed (24.4% of Italian public hospitals); 41.7% of the surveyed hospitals had an organized APS. University and teaching hospitals had an organized APS more frequently than did other hospitals (P<0.02). Continuous intravenous analgesia using elastomeric infusion systems was the most commonly used analgesic technique, performed in 44% of the treated patients. The frequency of both intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and epidural techniques was extremely low (5% and 13%, respectively). The main reasons given for suboptimal pain relief were inadequate training of surgeons and nurses (44.3%), poor organization (29.9%), and lack of equipment (21.5%). A total of 51.2% of the respondents would like to have a dedicated anesthesiologist assigned on a daily rotational basis to postoperative pain management.
A comparison to international survey data showed that postoperative pain management in Italy is still below the European standards. Additional efforts to overcome these hurdles and to reach an acceptable level of quality are required.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Treatment of postoperative pain should rely on results from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses of high scientific quality. The efficacy of a particular intervention may depend on the type of surgical procedure, which supports the reporting of "procedure-specific" interventions. The aim of this systematic review was to document the procedure-specific evidence for analgesic interventions after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This PRISMA-compliant and PROSPERO-registered review includes randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of medication-based analgesic interventions after THA. Endpoints were postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores (rest and during mobilization), adverse events, and length of hospital stay. Fifty-eight trials with 19 different interventions were retrieved. High risk of bias, substantial differences in assessment-tools and criteria for pain, irregular reporting of adverse events, considerable differences in supplemental analgesic consumption, and basic analgesic regimens generally characterized trials. Meta-analyses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, local infiltration analgesia, intrathecal opioids, and lumbar plexus block provided a 24-hour intravenous morphine-sparing effect of 14.1 (95 % confidence interval: 8.0-20.2) mg, 7.5 (3.7-11.3) mg, 19.8 (14.9-24.7) mg, and 11.9 (6.4-17.3) mg, respectively. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and lumbar plexus block were demonstrated to provide reductions in postoperative pain scores. Intrathecal opioids increased pruritus, and lumbar plexus block reduced nausea and pruritus. The GRADE-rated quality of evidence ranged from low to very low throughout the analyses. This review demonstrated, that some analgesic interventions may have the capacity to reduce mean opioid requirements and/or mean pain intensity compared with controls, but the available randomized placebo-controlled trials does not allow a designation of a "best proven intervention" for THA.
    Pain 01/2015; 156(1):8-30. DOI:10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000003 · 5.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: T he control of postoperative pain is a central issue in the management of patients under-going surgery. Effective postoperative pain relief is associated with improved patient satisfaction and quality of life, 1, 2 whereas uncontrolled pain may affect clinical outcomes. 3, 4 Inadequately controlled acute pain may increase the likeli-hood of chronic pain after surgery; 2, 5 moreover, postoperative pain prolongs hospital stays lead-ing to increased healthcare costs. 6 Several guidelines addressing the management of pain in the perioperative setting have been is-sued over the last decade. 7-11 Optimal pain con-trol is achieved by an interdisciplinary effort involving anesthesiologists and other healthcare professionals, and by careful assessment of pain ITalian Observational Study of the management of mild-to-moderate Post-Operative Pain (ITOSPOP)
    Minerva anestesiologica 01/2012; 78(15):15-25. · 2.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The combination of ketamine and remifentanil seems to be associated with better analgesia and duration. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a ketamineremifentanil combination promotes improved postoperative analgesia. Prospective, randomized, double blind study of 40 patients undergoing video laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesia was performed with remifentanil, propofol, atracurium, and 50% oxygen. Group 1 (GI) patients received remifentanil ( and ketamine ( and Group 2 (G2) received remifentanil ( and saline solution. Morphine was administered at the end of the procedure, and postoperative pain was treated with morphine via PCA. We evaluated the severity of postoperative pain by a numerical scale from zero to 10 during 24hours. We registered the time to the first analgesic supplementation, amount of morphine used in the first 24hours, and adverse effects. There was a decrease in pain severity between extubation and other times evaluated in G1 and G2. There was no signifi cant difference in pain intensity between the groups. There was no difference between G1 (22±24.9min) and G2 (21.5±28.1min) regarding time to first dose of morphine and dose supplement of morphine consumed in G1 (29±18.4mg) and G2 (25.1±13.3mg). The combination of ketamine ( and remifentanil ( for cholecystectomy did not alter the severity of postoperative pain, time to first analgesic supplementation or dose of morphine in 24hours.
    Revista brasileira de anestesiologia 03/2013; 63(2):178-82. DOI:10.1016/S0034-7094(13)70211-3 · 0.42 Impact Factor