Model Aggregation: a building-block approach to creating large macromolecular regulatory networks

Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Bioinformatics (Impact Factor: 4.98). 10/2009; 25(24):3289-95. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp581
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Models of regulatory networks become more difficult to construct and understand as they grow in size and complexity. Modelers naturally build large models from smaller components that each represent subsets of reactions within the larger network. To assist modelers in this process, we present model aggregation, which defines models in terms of components that are designed for the purpose of being combined.
We have implemented a model editor that incorporates model aggregation, and we suggest supporting extensions to the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 3. We illustrate aggregation with a model of the eukaryotic cell cycle 'engine' created from smaller pieces.
Java implementations are available in the JigCell Aggregation Connector. See

16 Reads
  • Source
    • "This precludes the spontaneous comparison of additional or novel GEMs, such as those from the model SEED (Henry et al., 2010). Tools do exist to compare and to merge arbitrary SBML formatted regulatory (Randhawa et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010) or biochemical (Krause et al., 2010; Schulz et al., 2012) models. However, these methods are predominantly aimed at combining (sub-) models into larger entities. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genome-scale reconstructions and models (GEMs), as collections of genomic and metabolic information, provide a useful means to compare organisms. Comparison requires that models are similarly notated in order to pair shared components. Matching and comparison of GEMs is facilitated by modelBorgifier. It reconciles models in light of different annotation schemes, allowing diverse models to become useful for synchronous investigation. The modelBorgifier toolbox is freely available at CONTACT:
    Bioinformatics 12/2013; 30(7). DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt747 · 4.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The field of systems biology studies how the interactions among individual components (e.g. genes and proteins) yield interesting and complex behavior. The circadian (daily) timekeeping system in mammals is an ideal system to study complexity because of its many biological scales (from genes to animal behavior). A wealth of data at each of these scales has recently been discovered. Within each scale, modeling can advance our understanding of challenging problems that arise in studying mammalian timekeeping. However, future work must focus on bridging the multiple spatial and temporal scales in the modeling of SCN network. Here we review recent advances, and then delve into a few areas that are promising research directions. We also discuss the flavor of modeling needed (simple or detailed) as well as new techniques that are needed to meet the challenges in modeling data across scales.
    Current opinion in genetics & development 10/2010; 20(6):626-33. DOI:10.1016/j.gde.2010.09.006 · 7.57 Impact Factor
Show more