10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.

The Lancet (Impact Factor: 39.21). 10/2009; 374(9702):1677-86. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In the 2.8 years of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) randomised clinical trial, diabetes incidence in high-risk adults was reduced by 58% with intensive lifestyle intervention and by 31% with metformin, compared with placebo. We investigated the persistence of these effects in the long term.
All active DPP participants were eligible for continued follow-up. 2766 of 3150 (88%) enrolled for a median additional follow-up of 5.7 years (IQR 5.5-5.8). 910 participants were from the lifestyle, 924 from the metformin, and 932 were from the original placebo groups. On the basis of the benefits from the intensive lifestyle intervention in the DPP, all three groups were offered group-implemented lifestyle intervention. Metformin treatment was continued in the original metformin group (850 mg twice daily as tolerated), with participants unmasked to assignment, and the original lifestyle intervention group was offered additional lifestyle support. The primary outcome was development of diabetes according to American Diabetes Association criteria. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This study is registered with, number NCT00038727.
During the 10.0-year (IQR 9.0-10.5) follow-up since randomisation to DPP, the original lifestyle group lost, then partly regained weight. The modest weight loss with metformin was maintained. Diabetes incidence rates during the DPP were 4.8 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI 4.1-5.7) in the intensive lifestyle intervention group, 7.8 (6.8-8.8) in the metformin group, and 11.0 (9.8-12.3) in the placebo group. Diabetes incidence rates in this follow-up study were similar between treatment groups: 5.9 per 100 person-years (5.1-6.8) for lifestyle, 4.9 (4.2-5.7) for metformin, and 5.6 (4.8-6.5) for placebo. Diabetes incidence in the 10 years since DPP randomisation was reduced by 34% (24-42) in the lifestyle group and 18% (7-28) in the metformin group compared with placebo.
During follow-up after DPP, incidences in the former placebo and metformin groups fell to equal those in the former lifestyle group, but the cumulative incidence of diabetes remained lowest in the lifestyle group. Prevention or delay of diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin can persist for at least 10 years.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK).

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prediabetes is an intermediate state of hyperglycemia with glycemic parameters above normal but below the diabetes threshold. While, the diagnostic criteria of prediabetes are not uniform across various international professional organizations, it remains a state of high risk for developing diabetes with yearly conversion rate of 5%-10%. Observational evidence suggests as association between prediabetes and complications of diabetes such early nephropathy, small fiber neuropathy, early retinopathy and risk of macrovascular disease. Several studies have shown efficacy of lifestyle interventions with regards to diabetes prevention with a relative risk reduction of 40%-70% in adults with prediabetes. While there is increasing evidence to prove the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in prevention of diabetes in adults with prediabetes, pharmaceutical treatment options other than metformin are associated with adverse effects that limit their use for prediabetes. There are no reports of systematic evaluation of health outcomes related to prediabetes in children. The effects of pharmacotherapy of prediabetes on growth and pubertal development in children remains unknown. Secondary intervention with pharmacotherapy with metformin is advocated for high-risk individuals but criteria for such consideration benefit of early intervention, long term cost effectiveness of such interventions and the end point of therapy remain unclear. Pharmacotherapy must be used with caution in children with prediabetes. Prediabetes is a condition defined as having blood glucose levels above normal but below the defined threshold of diabetes. It is considered to be an at risk state, with high chances of developing diabetes. While, prediabetes is commonly an asymptomatic condition, there is always presence of prediabetes before the onset of diabetes. The elevation of blood sugar is a continuum and hence prediabetes can not be considered an entirely benign condition. This aim of this review is to describe the challenges associated with diagnosis of prediabetes, the possible adverse medical outcomes associated with prediabetes and the treatment options and rationale for their use in context of prediabetes.
    03/2015; 6(2):296-303. DOI:10.4239/wjd.v6.i2.296
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) increases with age and reaches 25% in those older than age 65 years. Pre-diabetes status is also very common in the elderly, and is present in about half of those age 75 years and older. Many physicians care for elderly patients with diabetes and pre-diabetes, dealing with the challenge of controlling glucose levels and improving health with minimal adverse events. Over the last decade, research on diabetes among the elderly population has proliferated, adding new information on this topic. This review summarizes the updated medical literature on diabetes and pre-diabetes in the elderly, including the significance of pre-diabetic conditions, new-onset DM in the elderly and long-standing DM. The role of therapeutic intervention and the level of glycemic control for this population are discussed in particular.
    03/2015; 6(2):345-51. DOI:10.4239/wjd.v6.i2.345
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The hallmark of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is hyperglycemia, although there are multiple other metabolic abnormalities that occur with T2D, including insulin resistance and dyslipidemia. To advance T2D prevention and develop targeted therapies for its treatment, a greater understanding of the alterations in metabolic tissues associated with T2D is necessary. The aim of this study was to use microarray analysis of gene expression in metabolic tissues from a mouse model of pre-diabetes and T2D to further understand the metabolic abnormalities that may contribute to T2D. We also aimed to uncover the novel genes and pathways regulated by the insulin sensitizing agent (CL-316,243) to identify key pathways and target genes in metabolic tissues that can reverse the diabetic phenotype. Methods Male MKR mice on an FVB/n background and age matched wild-type (WT) FVB/n mice were used in all experiments. Skeletal muscle, liver and fat were isolated from prediabetic (3 week old) and diabetic (8 week old) MKR mice. Male MKR mice were treated with CL-316,243. Skeletal muscle, liver and fat were isolated after the treatment period. RNA was isolated from the metabolic tissues and subjected to microarray and KEGG database analysis. Results Significant decreases in the expression of mitochondrial and peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation genes were found in the skeletal muscle and adipose tissue of adult MKR mice, and the liver of pre-diabetic MKR mice, compared to WT controls. After treatment with CL-316,243, the circulating glucose and insulin concentrations in the MKR mice improved, an increase in the expression of peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation genes was observed in addition to a decrease in the expression of retinaldehyde dehydrogenases. These genes were not previously known to be regulated by CL-316,243 treatment. Conclusions This study uncovers novel genes that may contribute to pharmacological reversal of insulin resistance and T2D and may be targets for treatment. In addition, it explains the lower free fatty acid levels in MKR mice after treatment with CL-316,243 and furthermore, it provides biomarker genes such as ACAA1 and HSD17b4 which could be further probed in a future study.
    Nutrition and metabolism 03/2015; 12(8). DOI:10.1186/s12986-015-0003-8

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 10, 2014