Chapter 4 Regulation of Clusterin Activity by Calcium

Department of Cell Ultrastructure, Mossakowski Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Advances in Cancer Research (Impact Factor: 5.32). 12/2009; 104(1):33-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-230X(09)04004-4
Source: PubMed


In this chapter, the attention is put on Ca(2+) effect on Clusterin (CLU) activity. We showed that two CLU forms (secreted and nuclear) are differently regulated by Ca(2+) and that Ca(2+) fluxes affect CLU gene expression. A secretory form (sCLU) protects cell viability whereas nuclear form (nCLU) is proapoptotic. Based on available data we suggest, that different CLU forms play opposite roles, depending on intracellular Ca(2+) concentration, time-course of Ca(2+) current, intracellular Ca(2+) compartmentalization, and final Ca(2+) targets. Discussion will be motivated on how CLU acts on cell in response to Ca(2+) waves. The impact of Ca(2+) on CLU gene activity and transcription, posttranscriptional modifications, translation of CLU mRNA, and posttranslational changes as well as biological effects of CLU will be discussed. We will also examine how Ca(2+) signal and Ca(2+)-dependent proteins are attributable to changes in CLU characteristics. Some elucidation of CLU gene activity, CLU protein formation, maturation, secretion, and intracellular translocations in response to Ca(2+) is presented. In response to cell stress (i.e., DNA damage) CLU gene is activated. We assume that commonly upregulated mRNA for nCLU versus sCLU and vice versa are dependent on Ca(2+) accessibility and its intracellular distribution. It looks as if at low intracellular Ca(2+) the delay in cell cycle allows more time for DNA repair; otherwise, cells undergo nCLU-dependent apoptosis. If cells are about to survive, intrinsic apoptosis is abrogated by sCLU interacting with activated Bax. In conclusion, a narrow range of intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations is responsible for the decision whether nCLU is mobilized (apoptosis) or sCLU is appointed to improve survival. Since the discovery of CLU, a huge research progress has been done. Nonetheless we feel that much work is left ahead before remaining uncertainties related to Ca(2+) signal and the respective roles of CLU proteins are unraveled.

Download full-text


Available from: Arkadiusz Orzechowski, Dec 10, 2014
  • Source
    • "Calcium signalling plays a pivotal role in the regulation of the growth, differentiation, and apoptosis of many kinds of cells including epidermal keratinocytes [38]. Ca2+ concentrations may vary with time, even may oscillate (Ca2+ influx from intracellular stores and subsequent extracellular Ca2+ entry) offering a room for somewhat diverse outcomes such as increased cell proliferation versus differentiation and viability versus death in different types of cells including tumor cells [39]. Considering the importance of Ca2+ level in inducing cell proliferation, we measured changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration [Ca2+]i in glyphosate treated HaCaT cells, respectively, at regular time intervals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We demonstrated that glyphosate possesses tumor promoting potential in mouse skin carcinogenesis and SOD 1, calcyclin (S100A6), and calgranulin B (S100A9) have been associated with this potential, although the mechanism is unclear. We aimed to clarify whether imbalance in between [Ca(2+)] i levels and oxidative stress is associated with glyphosate-induced proliferation in human keratinocytes HaCaT cells. The [Ca(2+)] i levels, ROS generation, and expressions of G1/S cyclins, IP3R1, S100A6, S100A9, and SOD 1, and apoptosis-related proteins were investigated upon glyphosate exposure in HaCaT cells. Glyphosate (0.1 mM) significantly induced proliferation, decreases [Ca(2+)] i , and increases ROS generation in HaCaT cells, whereas antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) pretreatment reverts these effects which directly indicated that glyphosate induced cell proliferation by lowering [Ca(2+)] i levels via ROS generation. Glyphosate also enhanced the expression of G1/S cyclins associated with a sharp decrease in G0/G1 and a corresponding increase in S-phases. Additionally, glyphosate also triggers S100A6/S100A9 expression and decreases IP3R1 and SOD 1 expressions in HaCaT cells. Notably, Ca(2+) suppression also prevented apoptotic related events including Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and caspases activation. This study highlights that glyphosate promotes proliferation in HaCaT cells probably by disrupting the balance in between [Ca(2+)] i levels and oxidative stress which in turn facilitated the downregulation of mitochondrial apoptotic signaling pathways.
    08/2013; 2013(1):825180. DOI:10.1155/2013/825180
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) is an important bioactive constituent of green tea extract (GTE) that was widely believed to reduce proliferation of many cancer cell lines. The purpose of this study was to verify the possible pro-apoptotic action of GTE/EGCG in human colon adenocarcinoma COLO 205 cells. The effect of EGCG/GTE treatments on cell viability was studied using methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay. Cell proliferation was assessed with crystal violet staining, whereas protein expression levels were evaluated by western blotting followed by densitometric analysis. Obtained results were analyzed statistically. Surprisingly, EGCG/GTE dose-dependently up-regulated COLO 205 cells viability and proliferation. Observed effects were mediated by lipid rafts, as cholesterol depletion significantly prevented EGCG/GTE-dependent cell survival. Furthermore, treatment of COLO 205 cells with EGCG/GTE resulted in activation of MEK/ERK1/2, but not Akt1/2/GSK-3β signaling pathway. The presence of MEK inhibitor - PD98059 but not PI3-K inhibitor - LY294002, both reduced EGCG/GTE-induced ERK1/2 activation and the proliferative effect of catechins. Furthermore, EGCG/GTE stimulated secretory clusterin (sClu) expression level, which underwent complex control through lipid rafts/PKC/Wnt/β-catenin system. Our studies demonstrated that EGCG and GTE stimulate cell survival and proliferation of COLO 205 cells in a lipid rafts-dependent manner via at least MEK/ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Furthermore, EGCG/GTE mediated positive effects on viability and mitogenicity of COLO 205, while suppression of β-catenin activity was positively correlated with sClu clusterin expression.
    Journal of physiology and pharmacology: an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society 08/2011; 62(4):449-59. · 2.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Protein misfolding and conformational changes are a cornerstone of neurodegenerative diseases involving formation and deposition of toxic protein oligomers. Although mutations favor protein aggregation, physiological factors such as labile metal ions within the cellular environment are likely to play a role. Metal ions such as calcium, zinc and copper are key players in brain neurobiology, their homeostasis is altered in most neurodegenerative conditions and they are found within proteinaceous inclusions from patients. In this review we will elucidate the intricate interplay between protein (mis)folding and metal ions, discussing how metals modulate protein folding and influence protein energetics, with specific attention on conformational changes and structural fluctuations. In particular, the influence of metal ion dyshomeostasis during neurodegeneration and the effects of the unique physical and chemical properties at the synaptic environment will be discussed in the context of protein deposition. These interactions will be illustrated by specific examples of proteins involved in neurodegenerative diseases including α-synuclein, tau, superoxide dismutase 1, the prion protein and the amyloid-β peptide. With this approach we aim to systematize the effects of metal ions on protein conformers and illustrate pathways through which they modulate protein aggregation, under different conceptual mechanisms that bridge protein structure, metallochemistry and neurobiology.
    Coordination Chemistry Reviews 04/2012; DOI:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.004 · 12.24 Impact Factor
Show more