AS04, an aluminum salt- and TLR4 agonist-based adjuvant system, induces a transient localized innate immune response leading to enhanced adaptive immunity.

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium.
The Journal of Immunology (Impact Factor: 5.36). 11/2009; 183(10):6186-97. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901474
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Adjuvant System 04 (AS04) combines the TLR4 agonist MPL (3-O-desacyl-4'-monophosphoryl lipid A) and aluminum salt. It is a new generation TLR-based adjuvant licensed for use in human vaccines. One of these vaccines, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Cervarix, is used in this study to elucidate the mechanism of action of AS04 in human cells and in mice. The adjuvant activity of AS04 was found to be strictly dependent on AS04 and the HPV Ags being injected at the same i.m. site within 24 h of each other. During this period, AS04 transiently induced local NF-kappaB activity and cytokine production. This led to an increased number of activated Ag-loaded dendritic cells and monocytes in the lymph node draining the injection site, which further increased the activation of Ag-specific T cells. AS04 was also found to directly stimulate those APCs in vitro but not directly stimulate CD4(+) T or B lymphocytes. These AS04-induced innate responses were primarily due to MPL. Aluminum salt appeared not to synergize with or inhibit MPL, but rather it prolonged the cytokine responses to MPL at the injection site. Altogether these results support a model in which the addition of MPL to aluminum salt enhances the vaccine response by rapidly triggering a local cytokine response leading to an optimal activation of APCs. The transient and confined nature of these responses provides further supporting evidence for the favorable safety profile of AS04 adjuvanted vaccines.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Respiratory syncytial virus infection remains a serious health problem, not only in infants but also in immunocompromised adults and the elderly. An effective and safe vaccine is not available due to several obstacles: non-replicating RSV vaccines may prime for excess Th2-type responses and enhanced respiratory disease (ERD) upon natural RSV infection of vaccine recipients. We previously found that inclusion of the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) ligand monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) in reconstituted RSV membranes (virosomes) potentiates vaccine-induced immunity and skews immune responses toward a Th1-phenotype, without priming for ERD. As mucosal immunization is an attractive approach for induction of RSV-specific systemic and mucosal antibody responses and TLR ligands could potentiate such responses, we explored the efficacy and safety of RSV-MPLA virosomes administered intranasally (IN) to mice and cotton rats. In mice, we found that incorporation of MPLA in IN-administered RSV virosomes increased both systemic IgG and local secretory-IgA (S-IgA) antibody levels and resulted in significantly reduced lung viral titers upon live virus challenge. Also, RSV MPLA virosomes induced more Th1–skewed responses compared to responses induced by FI-RSV. Antibody responses and Th1/Th2- cytokine responses induced by RSV-MPLA virosomes were comparable to those induced by live RSV infection. By comparison, formalin-inactivated RSV (FI-RSV) induced serum IgG that inhibited viral shedding upon challenge, but also induced Th2-skewed responses. In cotton rats, similar effects of incorporation of MPLA in virosomes were observed with respect to induction of systemic antibodies and inhibition of lung viral shedding upon challenge, but mucosal sS-IgA responses were only moderately enhanced. Importantly, IN immunization with RSV-MPLA virosomes, like live virus infection, did not lead to any signs of ERD upon live virus challenge of vaccinated animals, whereas IM immunization with FI-RSV did induce severe lung immunopathology under otherwise comparable conditions. Taken together, these data show that mucosally administered RSV-MPLA virosomes hold promise for a safe and effective vaccine against RSV.
    Vaccine 01/2013; · 3.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Immunization against common bacterial and viral diseases has helped prevent millions of deaths worldwide. More recently, the concept of vaccination has been developed into a potentially novel strategy to treat and prevent cancer formation, progression, and spread. Over the past few years, a handful of anti-cancer vaccines have been licensed and approved for use in clinical practice, thus providing a breakthrough in the field. However, the path has not always been easy, with many hurdles that have had to be overcome in order to reach this point. Nevertheless, with more anti-cancer vaccines currently in development, there is still hope that they can eventually become routine tools used in the treatment and prevention of cancer in the future. This review will discuss in detail both types of anti-cancer vaccine presently used in clinical practice - therapeutic and preventive - before considering some of the more promising anti-cancer vaccines that are currently in development. Finally, the issue of side effects and the debate surrounding the overall cost-effectiveness of anti-cancer vaccines will be examined.
    The Yale journal of biology and medicine 12/2014; 87(4):481-489.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are sentinel receptors of the host innate immune system that recognize conserved 'pathogen-associated molecular patterns' of invading microbes, including viruses. The activation of TLRs establishes antiviral innate immune responses and coordinates the development of long-lasting adaptive immunity in order to control viral pathogenesis. However, microbe-induced damage to host tissues may release 'danger-associated molecular patterns' that also activate TLRs, leading to an overexuberant inflammatory response and, ultimately, to tissue damage. Thus, TLRs have proven to be promising targets as therapeutics for the treatment of viral infections that result in inflammatory damage or as adjuvants in order to enhance the efficacy of vaccines. Here, we explore recent advances in TLR biology with a focus on novel drugs that target TLRs (agonists and antagonists) for antiviral therapy.
    Future Virology 09/2014; 9(9):811-829. DOI:10.2217/fvl.14.70 · 1.00 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014