Neural correlates of affective influence on choice

School of Psychology, Bangor University, LL57 2AS, UK.
Brain and Cognition (Impact Factor: 2.48). 10/2009; 72(2):282-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.012
Source: PubMed


Making the right choice depends crucially on the accurate valuation of the available options in the light of current needs and goals of an individual. Thus, the valuation of identical options can vary considerably with motivational context. The present study investigated the neural structures underlying context dependent evaluation. We instructed participants to choose from food menu items based on different criteria: on their anticipated taste or on ease of preparation. The aim of the manipulation was to assess which neural sites were activated during choice guided by incentive value, and which during choice based on a value-irrelevant criterion. To assess the impact of increased motivation, affect-guided choice and cognition-guided choice was compared during the sated and hungry states. During affective choice, we identified increased activity in structures representing primarily valuation and taste (medial prefrontal cortex, insula). During cognitive choice, structures showing increased activity included those implicated in suppression and conflict monitoring (lateral orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate). Hunger influenced choice-related activity in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Our results show that choice is associated with the use of distinct neural structures for the pursuit of different goals.

Download full-text


Available from: John A Parkinson, Oct 06, 2015
15 Reads
  • Source
    • "This view of emotion is elegantly articulated by Gray and colleagues (Gray, 2001, Gray, Braver, Raichle, 2002), who posit that approach and withdrawal states adaptively influence the efficiency of specific cognitive functions, both enhancing and disrupting different cognitive functions in order to meet situational demands more effectively. Evidence for such emotional modulation of cognition is well accepted in decision-making (Delgado et al., 2003; Grabenhorst & Rolls, 2009; Hardin, Pine & Ernst, 2009; Piech et al., 2010), but also can be observed in other prefrontal mediated functions such as working memory. For instance, spatial vs. verbal working memory performance are inversely modulated by induction of positive vs. negative mood states, with spatial working memory being enhanced by withdrawal mood states and impaired by approach states, and verbal working memory showing the opposite effect (Gray, 2001). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychological research increasingly indicates that emotional processes interact with other aspects of cognition. Studies have demonstrated both the ability of emotional stimuli to influence a broad range of cognitive operations, and the ability of humans to use top-down cognitive control mechanisms to regulate emotional responses. Portions of the prefrontal cortex appear to play a significant role in these interactions. However, the manner in which these interactions are implemented remains only partially elucidated. In the present review we describe the anatomical connections between ventral and dorsal prefrontal areas as well as their connections with limbic regions. Only a subset of prefrontal areas are likely to directly influence amygdalar processing, and as such models of prefrontal control of emotions and models of emotional regulation should be constrained to plausible pathways of influence. We also focus on how the specific pattern of feedforward and feedback connections between these regions may dictate the nature of information flow between ventral and dorsal prefrontal areas and the amygdala. These patterns of connections are inconsistent with several commonly expressed assumptions about the nature of communications between emotion and cognition.
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 08/2011; 36(1):479-501. DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.08.005 · 8.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a pervasive and debilitating illness, with a recurrent course and chronic prognosis. Although effective treatments for MDD exist, there is a pressing need to characterize relapse vulnerability in order to design effective prophylactic care. To date, heterogeneity within depression neuroimaging research has made it difficult to establish a reliable biomarker of disorder susceptibility. In this paper, we review neuroimaging evidence for the assessment of MDD vulnerability, theorizing that current findings can be broadly distinguished between those indicating the presence of depressive episodes and those indicating MDD vulnerability during symptom remission. We argue that unlike the amygdala hyperactivity and prefrontal hypoactivity observed during MDD episodes, prefrontal hyperactivity may be a characteristic of dysphoric cognition during symptom remission that indicates MDD vulnerability and relapse risk. Drawing on current research of normative emotion regulation, we describe a potential test of MDD vulnerability, employing emotional challenge paradigms that induce cognitive reactivity — the increased endorsement of negative self-descriptions during a transient dysphoric mood. Relative to a normative model of prefrontal function, the neuroimaging assessment of cognitive reactivity may provide a reliable indicator of MDD vulnerability, advancing the field of biomarker research as well as the delivery of preventative treatment on an individual basis.
    12/2011; 2(4). DOI:10.2478/s13380-011-0033-2
Show more