The Future of Psychology: Connecting Mind to Brain.

Boston College, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School.
Perspectives on Psychological Science (Impact Factor: 4.89). 07/2009; 4(4):326-339. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01134.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Psychological states such as thoughts and feelings are real. Brain states are real. The problem is that the two are not real in the same way, creating the mind-brain correspondence problem. In this article, I present a possible solution to this problem that involves two suggestions. First, complex psychological states such as emotion and cognition an be thought of as constructed events that can be causally reduced to a set of more basic, psychologically primitive ingredients that are more clearly respected by the brain. Second, complex psychological categories like emotion and cognition are the phenomena that require explanation in psychology, and, therefore, they cannot be abandoned by science. Describing the content and structure of these categories is a necessary and valuable scientific activity.Physical concepts are free creations of the human mind, and are not, however it may seem, uniquely determined by the external world.-Einstein & Infeld (1938, p. 33)The cardinal passions of our life, anger, love, fear, hate, hope, and the most comprehensive divisions of our intellectual activity, to remember, expect, think, know, dream (and he goes on to say, feel) are the only facts of a subjective order…-James (1890, p. 195).

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychopharmacology has had some bad publicity lately. Frankly, there have been some major problems along the way in developing new effective drugs for psychiatric disorders. After a prolonged period of high investments but low success rates, big pharmaceutical companies seem to retract their activities in the psychopharmacology field. Yet, the burden of mental disorders is likely to keep on growing in the next decades. In this position paper, we focus on drug development for depression and anxiety disorders, to narrow the scope of the assay. We describe the current situation of the psychopharmacology field, and analyse some of the methods and paradigms that have brought us here, but which should perhaps change to bring us even further. In addition, some of the factors contributing to the current stagnation in psychopharmacology are discussed. Finally, we suggest a number of changes that could lead to a more rational strategy for central nervous system drug development and which may circumvent some of the pitfalls leading to "me too" approaches. Central to the suggested changes, is the notion that mental disorders do not lead to several symptoms, but a network of causally related symptoms convolutes into a mental disorder. We call upon academia to put these changes in the early phases of drug development into effect. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    European journal of pharmacology 03/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.020 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Psihologie Aplicată: Evoluţie Intensivă şi Extensivă, 01/2012: pages 285-303; Arhip Art.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The development of epistemological paradigm of psychology could be divided in three stages which reflect the cultural state of society's development. Psychological understanding has drawn its primary view and has constituted its fundamental laws mirroring natural, social and cultural reality successively. This evolution is consistent with the humanistic course of Maslow's pyramid, which corresponds to human being tri-unitary humanistic constitution: nature, society and culture. We can call this the “humanistic development of epistemological paradigm of psychology”. The time for the last scientific “revolution” toward final form of psychology is coming. Are the psychologists and public prepared for this?
    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 01/2011;

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014