Article

Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer.

Department of Surgery and Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 29.98). 10/2009; 302(15):1685-92. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1498
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT After 20 years of screening for breast and prostate cancer, several observations can be made. First, the incidence of these cancers increased after the introduction of screening but has never returned to prescreening levels. Second, the increase in the relative fraction of early stage cancers has increased. Third, the incidence of regional cancers has not decreased at a commensurate rate. One possible explanation is that screening may be increasing the burden of low-risk cancers without significantly reducing the burden of more aggressively growing cancers and therefore not resulting in the anticipated reduction in cancer mortality. To reduce morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer and breast cancer, new approaches for screening, early detection, and prevention for both diseases should be considered.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
138 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Breast cancer screening is central to early breast cancer detection. Identifying and monitoring process measures for screening is a focus of the National Cancer Institute’s Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) initiative, which requires participating centers to report structured data across the cancer screening continuum. We evaluate the accuracy of automated information extraction of imaging findings from radiology reports, which are available as unstructured text. We present prevalence estimates of imaging findings for breast imaging received by women who obtained care in a primary care network participating in PROSPR (n = 139,953 radiology reports) and compared automatically extracted data elements to a “gold standard” based on manual review for a validation sample of 941 randomly selected radiology reports, including mammograms, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The prevalence of imaging findings vary by data element and modality (e.g., suspicious calcification noted in 2.6 % of screening mammograms, 12.1 % of diagnostic mammograms, and 9.4 % of tomosynthesis exams). In the validation sample, the accuracy of identifying imaging findings, including suspicious calcifications, masses, and architectural distortion (on mammogram and tomosynthesis); masses, cysts, non-mass enhancement, and enhancing foci (on MRI); and masses and cysts (on ultrasound), range from 0.8 to1.0 for recall, precision, and F-measure. Information extraction tools can be used for accurate documentation of imaging findings as structured data elements from text reports for a variety of breast imaging modalities. These data can be used to populate screening registries to help elucidate more effective breast cancer screening processes.
    Journal of Digital Imaging 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10278-014-9762-4 · 1.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hintergrund Deutschland war 2008 das erste Land, das ein flächendeckendes bevölkerungsbezogenes Hautkrebsscreening einführte, nachdem ein Pilotprojekt in Schleswig-Holstein vielversprechende Ergebnisse gezeigt hatte. Ziel der Arbeit In dem Beitrag wird ein Überblick über die bisherige Evidenz zur Effektivität eines deutschen Hautkrebsscreenings gegeben. Material und Methoden Aus Daten des Pilotprojekts wurde die „Number Needed to Screen“ bestimmt. Der Einfluss des Screenings auf die Melanom-Inzidenz und -Mortalität wurde anhand von Krebsregisterdaten für Schleswig-Holstein und der angrenzenden Regionen sowie der Todesursachenstatistik untersucht. Ergebnisse Bei 1 von 116 Screening-Teilnehmern wurde ein bösartiger Hauttumor gefunden und bei 1 von 620 ein Melanom. Die intensivierte Suche nach Hautkrebs führte erwartungsgemäß zu einer Zunahme der Melanom-Inzidenz während des Pilotprojekts und einer darauf folgenden Abnahme. In Schleswig-Holstein trat nach dem Pilotprojekt ein Rückgang der Melanom-Mortalität ein, der in keiner der angrenzenden Vergleichsregionen beobachtet werden konnte. Schlussfolgerung Die aktuelle Evidenzlage legt nahe, dass ein bevölkerungsbezogenes Hautkrebsscreening machbar und effektiv ist. Jedoch ist weitere Forschung dringend erforderlich. Offene Fragen betreffen das Nutzen-Schaden-Verhältnis eines Hautkrebsscreenings, Intervallkarzinome und Kosteneffektivität.
    Der Onkologe 06/2014; 20(6):535-542. DOI:10.1007/s00761-013-2524-y · 0.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies have demonstrated the potential of the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program to improve the condition of individuals with health outcomes such as hypertension, diabetes, and chronic pain; improve psychological well-being; reduce stress levels; and increase survival among cancer patients. To date, only one study has focused on the effect of long-term meditation on stress, showing a positive protective relationship. However, the relationship between meditation and cancer incidence remains unexplored. The objective of this study was to describe the state-level relationship between MBSR instructors and their practices and county-level health outcomes, including cancer incidence, in the United States. This ecologic study was performed using geospatial mapping and descriptive epidemiology of statewide MBSR characteristics and overall health, mental health state rankings, and age-adjusted cancer incidence rates. Weak to moderate state-level correlations between meditation characteristics and colorectal and cervical cancer incidence were detected, with states with more meditation (e.g., more MBSR teachers per population) correlated with a decreased cancer incidence. A negative correlation was detected between lung & bronchus cancer and years teaching MBSR only. Moderate positive correlations were detected between Hodgkin's Lymphoma and female breast cancer in relation to all meditation characteristics. Statistically significant correlations with moderate coefficients were detected for overall health ranks and all meditation characteristics, most strongly for total number of years teaching MBSR and total number of years of general meditation practice. Our analyses might suggest that a relationship exists between the total number of MBSR teachers per state and the total number of years of general meditation practice per state, and colorectal and cervical cancer incidence. Positive correlations were observed with overall health rankings. Despite this study's limitations, its findings could serve to generate hypotheses and to inform and motivate a new focus on meditation and stress reduction in relation to cancer incidence, with specific relevance to colorectal and cervical cancer.
    BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 12/2015; 15(1):545. DOI:10.1186/s12906-015-0545-3 · 1.88 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
4 Downloads
Available from