A comparison of aspirin and clopidogrel with or without proton pump inhibitors for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding.

Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Clinical Therapeutics (Impact Factor: 2.59). 09/2009; 31(9):2038-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.09.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study was conducted to compare the risk of recurrent hospitalization for major gastrointestinal (GI) complications (peptic ulcer, bleeding, and perforation) in patients at high GI risk who require ongoing antiplatelet therapy (aspirin [acetylsalicylic acid] or clopidogrel) with or without proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).
This population-based, retrospective cohort study employed data from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance database (January 2001 through December 2006) for patients who had a history of hospitalization for GI complications before the initiation of antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel. Recurrent hospitalizations for major GI complications were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model, with adjustment for age, sex, ulcer-related medical history, ulcer-related risk factors, and use of ulcer-related medications during follow-up. The propensity score method was applied to adjust for selection bias.
The analysis included data from 14,627 patients (12,001 receiving aspirin, 2626 receiving clopidogrel). The incidence of recurrent hospitalization for major GI complications was 0.125 per person-year in aspirin users, 0.103 per person-year in users of aspirin plus a PPI, 0.128 per person-year in clopidogrel users, and 0.152 per person-year in users of clopidogrel plus a PPI. Among aspirin users, those taking PPIs had a significantly lower adjusted risk of hospitalization for major GI complications than did non-PPI users (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91). Use of a PPI was not associated with a significant risk reduction among clopidogrel users (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.89-1.33). An adjusted survival curve for the risk of recurrent hospitalization for major GI complications indicated that the risk increased numerically faster in clopidogrel users compared with those using aspirin plus a PPI, although the mean drug cost per person-year was 5.08 times higher in clopidogrel users than in users of aspirin plus a PPI.
In this analysis in patients at high GI risk who were receiving antiplatelet therapy for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events, aspirin plus a PPI was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent hospitalization for major GI complications. This was not the case for clopidogrel plus a PPI.

Download full-text


Available from: Fei-Yuan Hsiao, Jul 06, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has been recent concern regarding a possible adverse interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), coupled with uncertainty as to whether PPIs genuinely help in reducing gastrointestinal (GI) harm. To perform a meta-analysis of GI outcomes in patients taking clopidogrel, with and without concomitant PPI. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register from inception to March 2010, and checked conference abstracts for randomized and non-randomized studies that reported on adverse GI events (haemorrhage, ulcer, perforation or obstruction) with PPI exposure in patients taking clopidogrel. Relevant studies were subcategorized according to the degree of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) co-administration and nature of GI events, where available. We performed random effects meta-analysis for risk of adverse GI events with PPI exposure in clopidogrel-treated patients, and assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. Our review evaluated 71,277 participants in nine retrospective studies and one randomized trial. Exposure to PPI for patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel in seven studies) was associated with a significant reduction in adverse GI events, odds ratio (OR) 0.38 (95% CI 0.21, 0.68; p=0.001; I2=17%). There was significant heterogeneity in the analysis of patients receiving clopidogrel monotherapy (two studies), and no definite benefit was found. Restricting the analysis to studies specifically reporting upper GI bleeds with any clopidogrel exposure yielded an OR of 0.31 (95% CI 0.19, 0.51; p<0.001; I2=27%) with associated PPI exposure. Use of PPIs is associated with a reduction in adverse GI events (particularly haemorrhages) in patients who are receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. Clinicians should carefully weigh up the evidence for potential GI benefits against the uncertainties surrounding any possible adverse cardiovascular impact of concomitant clopidogrel PPI therapy.
    Drug Safety 11/2010; 34(1):47-57. DOI:10.2165/11584750-000000000-00000 · 2.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel and aspirin has been successful in reducing ischemic events in a wide range of patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, the anti-ischemic effects of DAPT may also be associated with gastrointestinal (GI) complications including ulceration and bleeding particularly in 'high risk' and elderly patients. Current guidelines recommend the use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) to reduce the risk of GI bleeding in patients treated with DAPT. However, pharmacodynamic studies suggest an effect of PPIs on clopidogrel metabolism with a resultant reduction in platelet inhibitory effects. Similarly, several observational studies have demonstrated reduced clopidogrel benefit in patients who coadministered PPIs. Although recent US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency statements discourage PPI (particularly omeprazole) and clopidogrel coadministration, the 2009 AHA/ACC/SCAI PCI guidelines do not support a change in current practice in the absence of adequately powered prospective randomized clinical trial data. The data regarding pharmacologic and clinical interactions between PPI and clopidogrel therapies are herein examined and treatment strategies are provided.
    Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 11/2010; 2:233-40. DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S7297
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is often co-prescribed with clopidogrel to reduce the gastrointestinal risk of bleeding ulcers in patients following acute coronary syndrome or a stent implant. However, the safety issue of such practice has been scrutinized after some studies reporting an increased incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality, although there have also been contrary research reports. This has lead to a warning statement from the US Food and Drug Administration cautioning the concomitant use of PPI and clopidogrel. This review examines the evidence of PPI as gastroprotective agent, histamine H(2) antagonists as an alternative therapy, the influence of PPI on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, and the controversies of various studies.
    Journal of Digestive Diseases 12/2010; 11(6):334-42. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-2980.2010.00466.x · 1.92 Impact Factor