Financial Status, Employment, and Insurance Among Older Cancer Survivors

Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Copenhagen C, Denmark.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 11/2009; 24 Suppl 2(S2):S438-45. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1034-5
Source: PubMed


Few data are available about the socioeconomic impact of cancer for long-term cancer survivors.
To investigate socioeconomic outcomes among older cancer survivors compared to non-cancer patients.
2002 Health and Retirement Study.
We studied 964 cancer survivors of > 4 years and 14,333 control patients who had never had cancer from a population-based sample of Americans ages >or= 55 years responding to the 2002 Health and Retirement Study.
We compared household income, housing assets, net worth, insurance, employment, and future work expectations.
Propensity score methods were used to control for baseline differences between cancer survivors and controls.
Female cancer survivors did not differ from non-cancer patients in terms of income, housing assets, net worth, or likelihood of current employment (all P > 0.20); but more were self-employed (25.0% vs. 17.7%; P = 0.03), and fewer were confident that if they lost their job they would find an equally good job in the next few months (38.4% vs. 45.9%; P = 0.03). Among men, cancer survivors and noncancer patients had similar income and housing assets (both P >or= 0.10) but differed somewhat in net worth (P = 0.04). Male cancer survivors were less likely than other men to be currently employed (25.2% vs. 29.7%) and more likely to be retired (66.9% vs. 62.2%), although the P value did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). Men were also less optimistic about finding an equally good job in the next few months if they lost their current job (33.5% vs. 46.9%), although this result was not significant (P = 0.11).
Despite generally similar socioeconomic outcomes for cancer survivors and noncancer patients ages >or=55 years, a better understanding of employment experience and pessimism regarding work prospects may help to shape policies to benefit cancer survivors.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "Propensity score weighting was then used to reweight beneficiary and non-beneficiary observations to be representative of the population of interest [30]. Each child was assigned a “population-overlap weight” (propensity of being in the opposite group) [33]. This technique balances characteristics to resemble those among overlapping portions of the treatment and control distributions of observed characteristics, thereby minimizing the variance of the estimates [33]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs provide poor families with cash conditional on investments in health and education. Brazil's Bolsa Familia program began in 2003 and is currently the largest CCT program in the world. This community-based study examines the impact of Bolsa Familia on child health in a slum community in a large urban center. In 2010, detailed household surveys were conducted with randomly selected Bolsa Familia beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries in a Brazilian slum community of approximately 14,000 inhabitants in a large urban center. 567 families (with 1,266 children) were interviewed. Propensity score methods were used to control for differences between beneficiary and non-beneficiary children to estimate program impacts on health care utilization and health outcomes. Bolsa Familia has increased the odds of children's visits to the health post for preventive services. In children under age seven, Bolsa Familia was associated with increased odds for growth monitoring (OR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.9-5.1), vaccinations (OR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.4-5.4), and checkups (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 0.98-2.5), and with the number of growth monitoring visits (beta = 0.6; p = 0.049) and checkups (beta = 0.2; p = 0.068). There were positive spillover effects on older siblings (ages 7-17) no longer required to meet the health conditionalities. Bolsa Familia increased their odds for growth monitoring (OR = 2.5; 95% CI 1.3-4.9) and checkups (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 0.9-3.2) and improved psychosocial health (beta = 2.6; p = 0.007). Bolsa Familia has improved health care utilization, especially for services related to the health conditionalites, and there were positive spillover effects on older siblings. The findings of this study are promising, but they also suggest that further improvements in health may depend on the quality of health care services provided, the scope of services linked to the health conditionalities, and coordination with other social safety net programs.
    BMC International Health and Human Rights 04/2014; 14(1):10. DOI:10.1186/1472-698X-14-10 · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, such financial pressures are not often discussed with health professionals [3,4]. Evidence shows that cancer is likely to affect patients' incomes although there appear to be differential effects depending on the type of cancer [5] and whether those affected are still in employment or retired [6]. Surviving cancer is associated with unemployment [7] and loss of earnings disproportionately affects those in low income groups [8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the UK many people with cancer and their carers do not have easy access to the welfare benefits to which they are entitled adding further strain to the process of dealing with cancer. It is estimated that nine out of ten cancer patients' households experience loss of income as a direct result of cancer, which, due to its socio-economic patterning disproportionately affects those most likely to be financially disadvantaged. In the UK proactive welfare rights advice services accessed via health care settings significantly increase benefit entitlement among people with health problems and this paper reports on a qualitative study examining the impact of a welfare rights advice service specifically designed for people affected by cancer and their carers in County Durham, North East England (UK). Twenty two men and women with cancer or caring for someone with cancer who were recipients of welfare rights advice aged between 35 and 83 were recruited from a variety of health care and community settings. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken and analysed using the Framework method. Most of the participants experienced financial strain following their cancer diagnosis. Participants accessed the welfare rights service in a variety of ways, but mainly through referral by other professionals. The additional income generated by successful benefit claims was used in a number of ways and included offsetting additional costs associated with cancer and lessening the impact of loss of earnings. Overall, receiving welfare rights advice eased feelings of stress over financial issues at a time when participants were concerned about dealing with the impact of cancer. Lack of knowledge about benefit entitlements was the main barrier to accessing benefits, and this outweighed attitudinal factors such as stigma and concerns about benefit fraud. Financial strain resulting from a cancer diagnosis is compounded in the UK by lack of easy access to information about benefit entitlements and assistance to claim. Proactive welfare rights advice services, working closely with health and social care professionals can assist with the practical demands that arise from dealing with the illness and should be considered an important part of a holistic approach to cancer treatment.
    BMC Health Services Research 09/2010; 10(1):259. DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-10-259 · 1.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aufgrund verbesserter Prognosen können viele Patientinnen und Patienten mit einer Krebsdiagnose heute wieder in das Berufsleben zurückkehren. Das vorliegende systematische Review untersucht geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede der beruflichen Folgen einer Krebserkrankung. Dafür wurde eine systematische Datenbankrecherche der zwischen 01/2001 und 07/2011 publizierten Literatur zu beruflichen Folgen von Krebs durchgeführt. 44 Originalarbeiten entsprachen den Einschlusskriterien (erwachsene Krebspatienten, Fokus auf arbeitsbezogene Outcomes, geschlechtsbezogen berichtete Ergebnisse). Die Ergebnisse dieser Studien weisen darauf hin, dass Patientinnen im Vergleich zu Patienten eher Leistungseinschränkungen bei der Berufsausübung erleben, ihre Arbeitszeit häufiger verkürzen und tendenziell mehr Einkommenseinbußen verzeichnen. Ein supportives Arbeitsumfeld scheint insbesondere für Patientinnen einen wichtigen Einflussfaktor auf die erfolgreiche und dauerhafte Reintegration ins Arbeitsleben darzustellen. Es bedarf einer systematischeren Erforschung und stringenterer geschlechtsbezogener Analysen, um Gender-Aspekte arbeitsbezogener Outcomes nach einer Krebsdiagnose zu verstehen. Eine umfassendere Wissensbasis kann Hinweise geben, wie die Wiedereingliederung in den Beruf mit Blick auf geschlechtsspezifische Besonderheiten erfolgen kann.
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 04/2012; 55(4). DOI:10.1007/s00103-012-1454-y · 1.42 Impact Factor
Show more