Background for the proposal of SIOG guidelines for the management of prostate cancer in senior adults.

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon-Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France.
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology (Impact Factor: 5.27). 10/2009; 73(1):68-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.09.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The incidence of prostate cancer increases with age, with a median age at diagnosis of 68 years. Owing to increased life expectancy, the management of prostate cancer in senior adult men (i.e., aged 70 years or older) represents an important public health concern and a major challenge for the future. No specific guidelines have previously been published on the management of prostate cancer in older men. The SIOG has developed a proposal of recommendations in this setting.
A systematic bibliographical search focused on screening, diagnostic procedures, treatment options for localised, locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer in senior adults was performed. Specific aspects of the geriatric approach were emphasised, including evaluation of health status (nutritional, cognitive, thymic, physical and psycho-social) and screening for vulnerability and frailty. Attention was drawn to the consequences of androgen deprivation and complications of local treatment, mainly incontinence. The collected material has been reviewed and discussed by a scientific panel including urologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and geriatricians from both Europe and North America.
The consensus is to use either European Association of Urology or National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical recommendations for prostate cancer treatment and to adapt them to health status based on instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and activities daily living (ADL), comorbidity evaluation by Cumulative Illness Scoring Rating-Geriatrics and screening for malnutrition. Patients in Group 1 (no abnormality) are 'fit' and should receive the same treatment as younger patients; patients in Group 2 (one impairment in IADL or one uncontrolled comorbidity or at risk of malnutrition) are 'vulnerable' and should receive standard treatment after medical intervention; patients in Group 3 (one impairment in ADL or more than one uncontrolled comorbidity or severe malnutrition) are 'frail' and should receive adapted treatment; patients in Group 4 (dependent) should receive only symptomatic palliative treatment.
Treatment of prostate cancer in senior adults should be adapted to health status. Specific prospective studies in this setting are warranted.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Information regarding variability in the type and extent of health services used by elderly patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) in the initial period following diagnosis is limited. We evaluated health services utilization among elderly men with stage IV PCa with (M1) and without (M0) distant metastasis during the year following diagnosis. Methods We evaluated patients aged 66 and older with incident stage IV PCa during 2005–2007 using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Measures included skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay, hospice stay, and hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated to determine the association between M1 PCa and each health service. Poisson regression was used to assess hospital length of stay. Results The final sample included 3379 patients (20% M0; 80% M1). In the year following diagnosis, M1 patients had greater use of SNF (M0: 8%; M1: 22%), hospice (M0: 5%; M1: 20%), and hospitalization (M0: 43%; M1: 61%). Compared to M0 patients, M1 patients had statistically significantly higher adjusted odds of SNF use (OR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.38–2.59), hospice use (OR = 3.22; 95% CI = 2.19–4.72), and hospitalization (OR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.20–1.75). Among those hospitalized, M1 patients had 24% longer length of stay (p < 0.01). Conclusions There is 2- to 3-fold greater use of SNF and hospice, and higher hospitalization among M1 compared to M0 patients. Elderly patients with advanced PCa face significant clinical burden within the first year after their diagnosis. Greater understanding of the relationship between clinical disease burden and health services utilization can improve healthcare delivery in this population.
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology 07/2014; · 1.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2010, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) developed treatment guidelines for men with prostate cancer who are older than 70 years old. In 2013, a new multidisciplinary SIOG working group was formed to update these recommendations. The consensus of the task force is that older men with prostate cancer should be managed according to their individual health status, not according to age. On the basis of a validated rapid health status screening instrument and simple assessment, the task force recommends that patients are classed into three groups for treatment: healthy or fit patients who should have the same treatment options as younger patients; vulnerable patients with reversible impairment who should receive standard treatment after medical intervention; and frail patients with non-reversible impairment who should receive adapted treatment.
    The Lancet Oncology 08/2014; 15(9):e404–e414. · 24.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The incidence of prostate cancer increases with age. Current evidence suggests that prostate cancer is under treated in patients aged ≥70 years, despite evidence of efficacy and acceptable toxicity. Radical cystectomy and definitive radiotherapy are often denied owing to fears of post-operative complications and radiotherapy-associated gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity. However, modern radical prostatectomy techniques provide excellent clinical outcomes with low perioperative morbidity. Moreover, volume-restricted intensity-modulated radiation therapy is a significant improvement over previous 2D conformal radiotherapy with similar efficacy and lower toxicity. Androgen-deprivation therapy is also under-prescribed among the elderly, owing to concerns of increases in cardiac deaths and osteoporosis acceleration. However, prospective trials have not identified any increase in cardiovascular mortality among elderly men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy compared to age-matched controls. Most patients on androgen deprivation eventually progress to a castration-resistant state. At this stage, the disease still responds to newer agents that target the androgen pathway and to chemotherapy. Among the elderly, chemotherapy is under-prescribed even though it has been demonstrated to be palliative and improve survival. We describe the trends in prostate cancer management in the elderly and the importance of assessing comorbidity status, tumour characteristics, and health status, including a complete geriatric evaluation, before making treatment recommendations.
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 05/2014; · 15.03 Impact Factor