Article

Background for the proposal of SIOG guidelines for the management of prostate cancer in senior adults.

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon-Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France.
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology (Impact Factor: 5.27). 10/2009; 73(1):68-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.09.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The incidence of prostate cancer increases with age, with a median age at diagnosis of 68 years. Owing to increased life expectancy, the management of prostate cancer in senior adult men (i.e., aged 70 years or older) represents an important public health concern and a major challenge for the future. No specific guidelines have previously been published on the management of prostate cancer in older men. The SIOG has developed a proposal of recommendations in this setting.
A systematic bibliographical search focused on screening, diagnostic procedures, treatment options for localised, locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer in senior adults was performed. Specific aspects of the geriatric approach were emphasised, including evaluation of health status (nutritional, cognitive, thymic, physical and psycho-social) and screening for vulnerability and frailty. Attention was drawn to the consequences of androgen deprivation and complications of local treatment, mainly incontinence. The collected material has been reviewed and discussed by a scientific panel including urologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and geriatricians from both Europe and North America.
The consensus is to use either European Association of Urology or National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical recommendations for prostate cancer treatment and to adapt them to health status based on instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and activities daily living (ADL), comorbidity evaluation by Cumulative Illness Scoring Rating-Geriatrics and screening for malnutrition. Patients in Group 1 (no abnormality) are 'fit' and should receive the same treatment as younger patients; patients in Group 2 (one impairment in IADL or one uncontrolled comorbidity or at risk of malnutrition) are 'vulnerable' and should receive standard treatment after medical intervention; patients in Group 3 (one impairment in ADL or more than one uncontrolled comorbidity or severe malnutrition) are 'frail' and should receive adapted treatment; patients in Group 4 (dependent) should receive only symptomatic palliative treatment.
Treatment of prostate cancer in senior adults should be adapted to health status. Specific prospective studies in this setting are warranted.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
165 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Information regarding variability in the type and extent of health services used by elderly patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) in the initial period following diagnosis is limited. We evaluated health services utilization among elderly men with stage IV PCa with (M1) and without (M0) distant metastasis during the year following diagnosis. We evaluated patients aged 66 and older with incident stage IV PCa during 2005-2007 using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Measures included skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay, hospice stay, and hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated to determine the association between M1 PCa and each health service. Poisson regression was used to assess hospital length of stay. The final sample included 3379 patients (20% M0; 80% M1). In the year following diagnosis, M1 patients had greater use of SNF (M0: 8%; M1: 22%), hospice (M0: 5%; M1: 20%), and hospitalization (M0: 43%; M1: 61%). Compared to M0 patients, M1 patients had statistically significantly higher adjusted odds of SNF use (OR=1.89; 95% CI=1.38-2.59), hospice use (OR=3.22; 95% CI=2.19-4.72), and hospitalization (OR=1.45; 95% CI=1.20-1.75). Among those hospitalized, M1 patients had 24% longer length of stay (p<0.01). There is 2- to 3-fold greater use of SNF and hospice, and higher hospitalization among M1 compared to M0 patients. Elderly patients with advanced PCa face significant clinical burden within the first year after their diagnosis. Greater understanding of the relationship between clinical disease burden and health services utilization can improve healthcare delivery in this population.
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology 04/2014; · 1.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Docetaxel administered every 3- weeks is the standart treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) but it is associated with dose limiting toxicities. We analyzed the efficacy and tolerability of 3- weekly and weekly docetaxel in a Turkish cohort of CRPC patients with a special emphasis on the elderly patients. A retrospective analyses of 45 patients who received either 3- weekly or weekly docetaxel in a single urologic oncology clinic was performed. Response to therapy, toxicity and overall survival rates were evaluated. The mean age of patients was 70.0 (±8.8) years. Complete or partial PSA response was obtained in 45% of patients. The median overall survival was 20,0 months (SE 6.46; 95% CI 7,3-32,6). Absence of metastasis, time to CRPC>10 months, DP 75mg/m2 once every three weeks and PSA<50% at the end of the third cycle were associated with better overall survival. There was no significant survival difference between the patients aged 75 or older versus younger ones. The most common hematological toxicity was leukopenia which was dose limiting in only one patient. Administration of standart 3-weekly docetaxel is well tolerated in this relatively old cohort of Turkish CRPC patients and weekly administration can be a reasonable alternative in frail patients not only to prolong survival but also to palliate disease symptoms.
    Actas urologicas españolas 03/2014; · 1.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The incidence of prostate cancer increases with age. Current evidence suggests that prostate cancer is under treated in patients aged ≥70 years, despite evidence of efficacy and acceptable toxicity. Radical cystectomy and definitive radiotherapy are often denied owing to fears of post-operative complications and radiotherapy-associated gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity. However, modern radical prostatectomy techniques provide excellent clinical outcomes with low perioperative morbidity. Moreover, volume-restricted intensity-modulated radiation therapy is a significant improvement over previous 2D conformal radiotherapy with similar efficacy and lower toxicity. Androgen-deprivation therapy is also under-prescribed among the elderly, owing to concerns of increases in cardiac deaths and osteoporosis acceleration. However, prospective trials have not identified any increase in cardiovascular mortality among elderly men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy compared to age-matched controls. Most patients on androgen deprivation eventually progress to a castration-resistant state. At this stage, the disease still responds to newer agents that target the androgen pathway and to chemotherapy. Among the elderly, chemotherapy is under-prescribed even though it has been demonstrated to be palliative and improve survival. We describe the trends in prostate cancer management in the elderly and the importance of assessing comorbidity status, tumour characteristics, and health status, including a complete geriatric evaluation, before making treatment recommendations.
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 05/2014; · 15.03 Impact Factor