Article

Insulin pump failures are still frequent: a prospective study over 6 years from 2001 to 2007.

Department of Endocrinology, CHU Rennes, Hôpital sud, 16 boulevard de Bulgarie, 35203, Rennes, France.
Diabetologia (Impact Factor: 6.49). 10/2009; 52(12):2662-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-009-1549-7
Source: PubMed
1 Bookmark
 · 
62 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Little is known about the frequencies and types of nonmetabolic complications occurring in type 1 diabetes patients being treated by modern insulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]), when recorded by standardized questionnaire rather than clinical experience. Subjects and Methods: A self-report questionnaire was completed by successive subjects with type 1 diabetes attending an insulin pump clinic, and those with a duration of CSII of ≥6 months were selected for analysis (n=92). Questions included pump manufacturer, insulin, infusion set type and duration of use, frequency of infusion set and site problems, pump malfunctions, and patient-related problems such as weight change since starting CSII. Results: Median (range) duration of CSII was 3.3 (0.5-32.0) years, and mean±SD duration of infusion set use was 3.2±0.7 (range 2-6) days. The commonest infusion set problems were kinking (64.1% of subjects) and blockage (54.3%). Blockage was associated with >3 days of use of infusion sets plus lispro insulin in the pump (relative risk [95% confidence interval], 1.71 [1.03-2.85]; P=0.07). The commonest infusion site problem was lipohypertrophy (26.1%), which occurred more often in those with long duration of CSII (4.8 [2.38-9.45] vs. 3.0 [1.50-4.25] years; P=0.01). Pump malfunction had occurred in 48% of subjects (43% in the first year of CSII), with "no delivery," keypad, and battery problems commonly occurring. Although some patients reported weight gain (34%) and some weight loss (15%) on CSII, most patients (51%) reported no change in weight. Conclusions: Pump, infusion set, and infusion site problems remain common with CSII, even with contemporary technology.
    Diabetes Technology &amp Therapeutics 11/2013; · 2.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The majority of bioengineering strategies to promote peripheral nerve regeneration after injury have focused on therapies to bridge large nerve defects while fewer therapies are being developed to treat other nerve injuries, such as nerve transection. We constructed delivery systems using fibrin gels containing either free GDNF or polylactide-glycolic acid (PLGA) microspheres with GDNF to treat delayed nerve repair, where ELISA verified GDNF release. We determined the formulation of microspheres containing GDNF that optimized nerve regeneration and functional recovery in a rat model of delayed nerve repair. Experimental groups underwent delayed nerve repair and treatment with GDNF microspheres in fibrin glue at the repair site or control treatments (empty microspheres or free GDNF without microspheres). Contractile muscle force, muscle mass, and MUNE were measured 12 weeks following treatment, where GDNF microspheres (2 week formulation) were superior compared to either no GDNF or short-term release of free GDNF to nerve. Nerve histology distal to the repair site demonstrated increased axon counts and fiber diameters due to GDNF microspheres (2 week formulation). GDNF microspheres partially reversed the deleterious effects of chronic nerve injury, and recovery was slightly favored with the 2 week formulation compared to the 4 week formulation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Biotechnology and Bioengineering 12/2012; · 4.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: Recovery following nerve transection declines when target reconnection is delayed for prolonged periods. GDNF has previously been shown to promote motor axon regeneration following delayed nerve repair. Materials & methods: We constructed delivery systems using fibrin gels containing free GDNF or poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres with GDNF. The delivery systems were implanted with fluorescent fibrinogen surrounding the common fibular (CF; peroneal) nerve in transgenic Thy-1 GFP rats (whose axons express GFP) to track degradation of the system. A delayed nerve repair model was designed by transecting the rat CF nerve, where nerve regeneration was prevented by ligating the two stumps to surrounding muscle for 2 months prior to resuture. At resuture, either a delivery system with GDNF or an additional group consisting of fibrin gels with empty microspheres were implanted surrounding the repair site. In an additional positive control, the CF was transected and repaired immediately without delay. Results: ELISA assays demonstrated GDNF release in vitro for 2 weeks from fibrin gels with GDNF microspheres. Implanted delivery systems, including GDNF microspheres, remained surrounding the nerve for at least 10 days compared with 3 days for free GDNF. Four weeks after repair, histomorphometry of distal nerve cross-sections taken 20 mm from the repair site demonstrated increased fiber diameter and myelin thickness due to release of GDNF from microspheres compared with empty microspheres. Additionally, the number of motoneurons that regenerated their axons to the same site increased to comparable levels as immediate repair due to the extended delivery of GDNF from microspheres. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that early measures of nerve regeneration after delayed nerve repair is improved by GDNF microspheres implanted at the coaptation site.
    Regenerative Medicine 01/2013; 8(1):27-37. · 3.87 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
5 Downloads
Available from
Jun 10, 2014